StarGateWars Forums

Ra wrote:anything saying the U.S. is going to invade or because Obama uses a teleprompter.. he's a puppet is nothing but yet another cockoo conspiracy theory.

he hasn't withdrawn troops, he's substituted troops for contractors...and please don't call me cuckoo ( cuckoo i think is the word you was looking for). calling people like me who deal in reality "cuckoo" or any other type of name is admitting defeat because you cant counter what i said.
your the one living in a dream if you think Obama/Barry or whatever the hell his name is-cares for anyone but himself and his masters.


lets be clear about something, mainstream political parties are heads on the same hydra and nothing more, which is why 1 party will moan and whine when the other side does something but NEVER changes anything the previous mob of outlaws did when they were in power....unless you can give me evidence to the contrary?


anyways, there is more to this than just words.

Yep, and fluoride causes decay.. flu shots kill.. 9/11 was a conspiracy.. Roswell was an alien cover up.. the mafia killed Kennedy.. NWO.. Oh and I'm sure the Bilderberg group controls Obama/the world too? Wait no.. it must be the Freemasons who are behind everything. Someone has listened to the nut job Alex Jones a bit too much. I'd say that's worse for your health than sucking down pure fluoride.

Iran is the last country that might pose a threat to American expansionism in the that area. I don't think its a conspiracy, I think its as public as it can get.

Anyway guys... ignore all the crap that Avenger just wrote as truth and lets move on to the real issue.

How do they get the caramel in the caramel bar?

By bribing the caramel with something sweet...

Thriller wrote:Anyway guys... ignore all the crap that Avenger just wrote as truth and lets move on to the real issue.

How do they get the caramel in the caramel bar?

nuclear fusion?

war with iran would mean many dead iranianianians.

does look like the cyberwar is hotting up aye

LiQuiD wrote:war with iran would mean many dead iranianianians.

is it just Iranians that would die?

you guys have a short memory, the Iran/Iraq war lasted 8 years. it started in in 1980 with a western backed Saddam invasion of Iran, it only took Iran 2 years to regain all lost territories.

i realise the western powers are no Saddam or Iraq, but the fact remains that Saddam was backed by the west and for 6 of those 8 years, Iraq was fighting a defensive war.

they cant just "nuke" Iran, if an attack goes ahead they will have to invade, it will be a bloodbath on both sides.

War with Iran, not anytime soon IMO

Yes Western powers dont like this fundamentalist regime and would like it destroyed.

Yes Iran has large Oil reserves which Western Oil companies want control of.

Yes they will be a major threat to the region when they gain nuclear capabilities.

BUT

The only justification that could work is if Iran attacked Israel and despite lots of big talk they are not stupid enough to do this.

The Iranian oil is currently sold to Russia and China who dont want Western governments/companies in control.

The cost in money and lives would be huge, no Western Government currently has the money or the support of it's voters for such action.



More likely is the Western powers will continue to support the anti-government groups in Iran in the hope they will rise up, and they can support a side they like in a civil war.

it would mean,

More deaths
More money wasted
...

thats about it

I`m not necesarily ruling out surgical strikes on Iranian nuclear instalations thoe by all acounts those are too guarded and dispersed for strikes to have major impacts. And you cant blow up working powerplants.

A war/invasion thoe?

Never going to happen.

For one Iran is 4x the size of Iraq with more than 2x its population. Revolutionary guard aint no pushover, their war with then western sponsored Itaq made sure of that. US has more than it can cope allready in iraq and afghanistan and a 3rd war will cause even more EU member states to just go "you know what, feck this nonsense, we`re out of here" and pull troops out. GL building another coalition of the willing after the Iraq lies too.

Secondly, Iran is not only a country with oil, it has the capacity to shut down Hormuz and 20% of worlds oil shipments. Added to that, they are the 2nd largest importer of oil to China. There is no way in heck military action will ever get sanctioned on the UN or other international level and even the US isnt that big of a cowboy to just waltz in nomatter what.

So I wouldnt worry. There is enough different intrests there to keep a war from happening.

Better focus our efforts on making israel stop its illegal setelments construction. Thoe its probably a long shot to stop that ethnic cleansing too heh...

What if . . . now this is crazy enough it just might work . . . what if US and UK intelligence agencies staged a Coup d'etat on Iran to get the oil. That way there would be no need for an invasion.

Oh wait that's been done before. We all know how that ended because here we are at the present day.

Brdavs wrote:I`m not necesarily ruling out surgical strikes on Iranian nuclear instalations.

thats the thing. we could blow up anything they build as part of a weapons program. it wouldnt be popular, but if its necessary that doesnt matter. putting troops on the ground would be very bad. if i remember correctly, a casulty estimate for a strike on N korea was 100k US troops and many, many, many more koreans.

Brdavs wrote:And you cant blow up working powerplants.

lol yeh you can. try telling an american he cant blow something up. . .

Brdavs wrote:For one Iran is 4x the size of Iraq with more than 2x its population. Revolutionary guard aint no pushover

aye, whole different prospect. but i think in a war/attack where occupation isnt the aim, they would be entirely outclassed. think of how israel bombed a syrian reactor. maybe the west will just let israel take care of the problem eh

MEZZANINE wrote:The cost in money and lives would be huge, no Western Government currently has the money or the support of it's voters for such action

aye, wouldnt be popular. the money can always be found for a war tho.

[KMA]Avenger wrote:is it just Iranians that would die?

in a war, no.
in an attack, maybe

there are always casualties in war. a surprising number of troops die in accidents etc outside of any warzone.
but with drones, missiles, stealth capability etc it would be possible to succeed without any losses.


if it comes down to it, we may have no choice but to attack them. regime change seems the only way (other than conflict or maybe united international pressure) to stop them. their leader says some truely scary things considering they come from one with his power and position.

Don't discount a full-scale war.

War is great for large war machines to increase local production and get spending and the economy going again.

Ghoul wrote:Don't discount a full-scale war.

War is great for large war machines to increase local production and get spending and the economy going again.

Last time that happened was during the Great Depression. Hasn't done much for the US or anybody as of late since western countries don't have the industries they used to. EG, the modern day "rust belt".

I love these war threads.

DavyC wrote:

Ghoul wrote:Don't discount a full-scale war.

War is great for large war machines to increase local production and get spending and the economy going again.

Last time that happened was during the Great Depression. Hasn't done much for the US or anybody as of late since western countries don't have the industries they used to. EG, the modern day "rust belt".

I love these war threads.

Agree,

But a large part of that rust-belt (what is left of it) is going under and with massive unemployment you need something to get things going.