Page 2 of 2

Re: eXstazi - 34612

Posted: Wed Sep 01, 2010 2:46 pm
by KnowLedge
@clarkey

ur a punk clarkey, No need to show off ur skills in using the search button..

just post the account IDs and be done with it and let the admin check.. GEEZ.. WHY MAKE THE ADMIN READ SO MUCH.


@ Exstazi

I believe he wants you to reply to this and wants to see how you reply.. just leave it alone and be done with it and wait for the admin.. which is prolly gonna be a very very very long time lmao..

if u are however a multi.. Maybe put an account on vac rite now and when the admin bans u, BEG HIM.... he will for sure give one of them back to you. OR u can send everything to a friend and get an another account after these accounts are banned. OR U can just chill because the admin doesn't check this very often and u might live for a month or two for sure.. The choice is yours to make, Ignore clarkey, he likes to show off.

Re: eXstazi - 34612

Posted: Wed Sep 01, 2010 8:47 pm
by Clarkey
KnowLedge wrote:@clarkey

ur a punk clarkey, No need to show off ur skills in using the search button..

just post the account IDs and be done with it and let the admin check.. GEEZ.. WHY MAKE THE ADMIN READ SO MUCH.
It's called giving a reason for the accounts to be checked. You can't just post the IDs and be done with it. If you're not going to provide anything valuable to the issue then I advise you to refrain from petty comments such as calling me a punk.

Re: eXstazi - 34612

Posted: Wed Sep 01, 2010 9:45 pm
by Exstazi
The reason i say so much is just to prove clarkey wrong which is have done sucessfully as the only reason he actually put this here is because its an old multi account which i have had for a year and i put a forum account to its name... Clarkey is no investigator its just a lottery system all new accounts made on the forum go in the barrol and then he spins it and picks a couple of them out and claims they are multis for no logit reason... If sith lord is a multi then ill understand why he is doing this but if sith is too found to be inocent of all this too then in my mind clarkeys credibility will take a huge dive

Re: eXstazi - 34612

Posted: Wed Sep 01, 2010 10:52 pm
by Clarkey
Exstazi wrote:Clarkey is no investigator
Actually you are wrong there. [-X

Exstazi wrote:if sith is too found to be inocent of all this too then in my mind clarkeys credibility will take a huge dive
Well I clearly wasn't wrong about him when I got him and his accounts banned before. Also I don't care about my credibility. Yes i've been wrong in the past but i've been right a lot more times than wrong. So I don't care what you or anyone else thinks. If I suspect it I report it. Simples as that. If you are innocent it actually goes in your favour.

Re: eXstazi - 34612

Posted: Thu Sep 02, 2010 4:48 am
by ƒëmmë ƒatalë
Clarkey wrote:First thing I noticed was a reference to Deidara.... well that doesn't bode well for anything.


Another thing for you Clarkey,

Beci'/Gaara' account id=81707 he "gave to a friend" funny thing is Beci mentioned using Deidra name to me, 10/07/2010 12:58:32 AM [a=1][c=50]Rampager :D (L) Alex [/c][/a] femme fatale- f (L) h am
10/07/2010 12:58:53 AM [a=1][c=50]Rampager :D (L) Alex [/c][/a] femme fatale- f (L) h if i join a rock village my ingame name and forum name is changed Deidara
10/07/2010 1:00:18 AM femme fatale- f (L) h [a=1][c=50]Rampager :D (L) Alex [/c][/a] whats your ingame name atm
10/07/2010 1:00:29 AM [a=1][c=50]Rampager :D (L) Alex [/c][/a] femme fatale- f (L) h x304Rampage

and leader of alliance the old account in said Deidra sold the account to the person that has it now :s

Re: eXstazi - 34612

Posted: Thu Sep 02, 2010 12:27 pm
by KnowLedge
Insulting and offtopic. Warning issued.
-Ben

Re: eXstazi - 34612

Posted: Fri Sep 03, 2010 2:51 am
by GOLDEN WING
when exstazi and I spoke nearly every day was last year he dissapeared for a good 2-5 months and we stopped talking i know his personality well.

Sithlord ive known for much much long and also know his personality both are entirly different.

extazi likes massing and fighting ,Sithlord is stil learning that part of game play.

summery

Exstazi - masses,likes to fight
Sithlord -just likes to farm adn raid etc.

hope this helps both your guys situation.

Re: eXstazi - 34612

Posted: Tue Sep 07, 2010 12:38 pm
by Exstazi
Ok then clarkey if this is so great i can post suspsion of multi about your account on the forum... I have as much reason to suspect you as you do to suspect me... we both have a forum account.... If this was so much about sith lord why is my name and id the topic tittle... Can you change that as if you haven't yet noticed nothing has happened here, admin obviously don't think your suspsions of me have any thing behind them so they have done nothing, change the topic name to sith lord x if that is who you are so right about. It has become abundantly clear in this topic im not a multi....

Re: eXstazi - 34612

Posted: Tue Sep 07, 2010 12:44 pm
by Clarkey
This is not about Sith Lord X anymore, it's about you.

And the fact nothing has been done has nothing to do with Admins not thinking my suspicion has any weight behind it, it's because admins don't look at this forum anymore, not since January 2010.

Re: eXstazi - 34612

Posted: Wed Sep 08, 2010 6:47 am
by BenjaminMS
Allright, enough. Clarkey, replying to him just could be in PM.
Exstazi, verbal attacks on others are not tolerated.

I am watching...

Re: eXstazi - 34612

Posted: Wed Sep 08, 2010 9:59 pm
by Exstazi
There was no verbal attack in there... It was only saying there is no reason for this topic. If you dont want any more posts in here remove the topic its pointless and there are no grounds for it. I have only asked for it to be locked and shut multiple times before... You continually fail to do anything... I asked for this to be closed as there is no grounds for it and its just slurring out my account for no reason... This topic is an attack on me... remove it or make clarkey post some evidence to back its existance

Re: eXstazi - 34612

Posted: Wed Sep 08, 2010 10:10 pm
by BenjaminMS
I am not giving an opinion here, except for the fact that I can't see an personal attack from Clarkey on you in it. Misguided report, perhaps, but not a verbal attack. If you're no multi or cheater, you can safely further ignore this thread. If you are, well...
Also, only the original poster of a thread can request it locked. Even then it is up to the mods to judge whether it should remain open or not. So far, I'll leave it open for anyone who's got more substantial proof.

Re: eXstazi - 34612

Posted: Sat Oct 16, 2010 10:19 pm
by Exstazi
Ok this has been here for ages now and nothing has happened can it now be removed. It has too be classed as spam by now lol