Hitchkok wrote:[KMA]Avenger wrote:why have you mixed 10/10/10 with Greece, those were 2 distinct and separate (hate to use the word>) predictions. do try and keep up
[KMA]Avenger wrote:basically, i just want to get the date of 10/10/10 and the ever worsening Greek situation on record BEFORE hand so i wont be accused of being a "nut" or Conspiracy theorist" after the fact.
You really should learn to right coherently. Anything less than a full sintextual deconstruction of the sentence would lead the reader to understand that they are connected.
oh please, that was the opening of the thread and if you bothered to read further you would see they were separate. so please don't preach to me how to write just because you cant read. [KMA]Avenger wrote:as for the above, no it doesn't void anything because if you study the Elites you will see they do change dates for events for many reasons, chief of which is when "their" plans are made public.
In other words, the fact that you just "made their plans public" means that you're right if you're right, and right if you're wrong.
BRILLIANT!!!
talking to you is like leading you by the hand because your incapable of reading and trying to comprehend what the writer is saying!
going public with info is not a handful of people sitting around and discussing what's going on, so why would "they" care what's said...is it the same situation when the knowledge is known by say 100,000 people marching and getting publicity?
these "people" cannot survive in the spotlight of publicity because who in their right mind would go along with all the crap if they knew the truth?! even you would have to admit (hypothetically speaking of course) that if there was such a cabal of men in the world they would have to execute these plans in secrecy and with the public in complete darkness....1 or a few or even hundreds is not a big enough number to scare them or for them to call it "public knowledge".
and this is the reason why you don't know what's going on and prefer to suck on the tit of state instead of using logic, common sense and engaging in critical thought:
Both major political parties used the media to build the perception of opposing positions on key issues, while all the while building consensus on issues that were critical to social change. That's verified in the Congressional Record for 1917, which reported that
"...the J.P. Morgan [banking] interests.... and their subsidiary organizations got together 12 men high up in the newspaper world and employed them to select the most influential newspapers in the United States and sufficient number of them to control generally the policy of the daily press of the US.... They found it was only necessary to purchase the control of 25 of the greatest papers. ...an editor was furnished for each paper to properly supervise and edit information...."
--Congressman Oscar Callaway statements were included in the Congressional Record (vol. 54, February 9, 1917, p. 2947)
'We are grateful to The Washington Post, The New York Times, Time Magazine, and other great publications whose directors have attended our meetings and respected their promises of discretion for almost forty years. It would have been impossible for us to develop our plan for the world if we had been subject to the lights of publicity during those years. But, the world is now more sophisticated and prepared to march towards a world government. The supranational sovereignty of an intellectual elite and world bankers is surely preferable to the national auto-determination [read as 'democracy'] practiced in past centuries."
--June 5, 1991, Bilderberger meeting in Baden Baden, Germany (a meeting also attended by then-Governor Bill Clinton)
and here, read this from the horses mouth openly admitting to what you call a "conspiracy theory",
"For more than a century ideological extremists at either end of the political spectrum have seized upon well-publicized incidents such as my encounter with Castro to attack the Rockefeller family for the inordinate influence they claim we wield over American political and economic institutions. Some even believe we are part of a secret cabal working against the best interests of the United States, characterizing my family and me as 'internationalists' and of conspiring with others around the world to build a more integrated global political and economic structure -- one world, if you will. If that's the charge, I stand guilty, and I am proud of it."
David Rockefeller's Memoirs, published in 2002
but what's the point since you will read it and let it go right over your head.
