Page 2 of 2

Posted: Sat Jan 28, 2006 11:32 am
by Encore
sgt.johnkeel wrote:erm Encore y does ur account sig say
Encore sig: Encore The Ultimate Cheat/Scammer Of Stargate

wierd :? is this him admitting to being a cheat?

yeah it is! :twisted: mwahahaha i have multi-accounts!!!

Posted: Sat Jan 28, 2006 11:36 am
by Londo Mollari
Encore wrote:
sgt.johnkeel wrote:erm Encore y does ur account sig say
Encore sig: Encore The Ultimate Cheat/Scammer Of Stargate

wierd :? is this him admitting to being a cheat?

yeah it is! :twisted: mwahahaha i have multi-accounts!!!

oooookay, thats wierd *runs away shouts for Mods or some1 to help*
Mods: this guy has just openly admitted to being a cheater! And on my topic as well, the cheek of it wasting a good thread! :-D
Encore: u r a nutcase and please don't kill me! :)

Posted: Sun Jan 29, 2006 11:26 am
by Encore
Encore wrote:
sgt.johnkeel wrote:erm Encore y does ur account sig say
Encore sig: Encore The Ultimate Cheat/Scammer Of Stargate

wierd :? is this him admitting to being a cheat?

yeah it is! :twisted: mwahahaha i have multi-accounts!!!


Wrong!!

Just Lord Mortmain is sad and thinks we care when hes in my account

Posted: Thu Feb 02, 2006 3:54 pm
by Thewisesirivanthes
You should have a percentage of the naq that A earns from attacking C go to B automatically and vice versa.

Posted: Fri Feb 03, 2006 9:45 am
by Londo Mollari
yeah that sounds like a gd idea :-D , but it would have to be balanced with the naq lost as well wouldn't it? :twisted:

Posted: Sat Feb 04, 2006 9:33 am
by Londo Mollari
BUMP

Posted: Sat Feb 04, 2006 9:45 am
by Anubis
sorry have to say bad idea, since it ultimatly lead to building 1 weapon and leeching on some1 else's attack.
If no1 suffers dmg or when A attacks and has only 1 weapon who is gonna take the dmg ?
So if i understand correctly say i got 10 bil att someone else has a treaty with me he attacks someone if i log on i see xxx amount of units gone hence maybe even the dmg on my weapons gone to 100% and i start losing weapons even IF i have to be online imho i think its still a bad idea.

Posted: Sat Feb 04, 2006 12:32 pm
by Londo Mollari
Anubis wrote:sorry have to say bad idea, since it ultimatly lead to building 1 weapon and leeching on some1 else's attack.
If no1 suffers dmg or when A attacks and has only 1 weapon who is gonna take the dmg ?
So if i understand correctly say i got 10 bil att someone else has a treaty with me he attacks someone if i log on i see xxx amount of units gone hence maybe even the dmg on my weapons gone to 100% and i start losing weapons even IF i have to be online imho i think its still a bad idea.

ok thats valid, BUT if u have a pact with a guy with 1 wep then (a) he is a idiot and will have a crappy rank!!! :twisted: and (b) u can just cancell it, and in the first place y would u agree to a treaty with a player with 1 wep.
Maybe u could introduce some kind of limit, like for a pact to occur each member must have a certain attack/ def stat! :-D

Posted: Sat Feb 04, 2006 2:29 pm
by Aegis99
maybe they would just have to be within a certain percentage of each other, i.e. player #1 can't be in one of these treaties with player #10,000.

Posted: Mon Feb 06, 2006 11:40 am
by Londo Mollari
yeah that could work, could pose some probs though

Posted: Tue Feb 07, 2006 11:15 am
by Londo Mollari
BUMP