StarGateWars Forums

they are going to turn it in the new world order.

Call me 'backwards' as much as you want, but I'd rather get my information from the BBC than the 'Libyan State News.'

so an ex congresswomen (more than likely scorned) and out to give a bad image upon the american goverment, and nato.

but yeah your right your evidence...is FLAWLESS

Removed

u dont have to be skeptic about a source that shows what u dont like. if u belive BBC then u should believe Libyan sate news they are on the same level. if u want to blind yr self then fine its what u decide but we know what happened in iraq , the reason to invade a country , we had wikileaks , and we have north africa troubles. how could u bring peace and freedom by waging wars. this is just a new form of colonization in 2000 century

Lithium wrote:u dont have to be skeptic about a source that shows what u dont like. if u belive BBC then u should believe Libyan sate news they are on the same level. if u want to blind yr self then fine its what u decide but we know what happened in iraq , the reason to invade a country , we had wikileaks , and we have north africa troubles. how could u bring peace and freedom by waging wars. this is just a new form of colonization in 2000 century

I'm sorry, but I don't think they are on the same level. The BBC is a public service broadcaster with impartiality enshrined at the heart of its charter. The Libyan State News, conversely, is directly controlled by Colonel Gadaffi's government.

actually its a private TV that follows politics its Board decide and usually they always backup teh country politics, like they did b4 the Iraq war started and when it ended they admitted it was wrong

Removed

For over 75 years people around the world have listened to the BBC world service for the truth because the BBC is the only broadcaster universally accepted as trustworthy.

Removed

MEZZANINE wrote:For over 75 years people around the world have listened to the BBC world service for the truth because the BBC is the only broadcaster universally accepted as trustworthy.

That is true.
Only paranoid people would say BBC isn't reliable source.

Now that Libyans caught a barely-alive Khadafi and that he is dead, they have harder things to succeed, build a democracy. Probably with king's dynasty as head of state, with less powers than Khadafi though. Otherwise it wouldn't be a democracy...
I'm really curious to see how it will go..

Sickening.