Page 2 of 3

Re: appropriateness part 2

Posted: Sun Jul 17, 2011 3:50 pm
by Psyko
The mere fact that my posts have been ignored thus far only proves to me one thing: the point of this thread is to complain and does not serve any other purpose (not even to fix the problem).

The only reported post in the Temple today was Nostra reporting his own post.

Haz wrote:
d. Pornographic and criminal content.
Posting anything of a pornographic nature is not permitted on the SGW forums. Pornographic being defined as: Sexually explicit pictures, writing, or other material whose primary purpose is to cause sexual arousal (dictionary.com). The SGW forums are not the place for discussing or facilitating criminal activity. This includes arranging to carry out a crime or the posting of illegal images (including copyrighted property).

Consequence:
This will result in the issuing of warning points. Very serious comments will be given more warning points. This will be judged with input from the Forum Administrators and Moderators. In cases of criminal activity the Administrators will not hesitate to contact the authorities.


This is the only rule I could find which would be appropriate. As the drugs mentioned are illegal, discussion of them, even just "I love <insert illegal drug here>" should not be allowed IMO.

Without there being a report or a rule against it, I was not required to mod the thread. I took the OP into consideration and determined that it did not warrant immediate moderation, especially since no one seemed to be upset by it. If there are people upset by it, I welcome them to report it officially and I will address the issue.

If no one would like to follow through with my suggestion, I will take it as nothing more than this thread attempting to start a fire where there may only be smoke.

Re: appropriateness part 2

Posted: Sun Jul 17, 2011 3:52 pm
by jedi~tank
Psyko wrote:The mere fact that my posts have been ignored thus far only proves to me one thing: the point of this thread is to complain and does not serve any other purpose (not even to fix the problem).

The only reported post in the Temple today was Nostra reporting his own post.

Haz wrote:
d. Pornographic and criminal content.
Posting anything of a pornographic nature is not permitted on the SGW forums. Pornographic being defined as: Sexually explicit pictures, writing, or other material whose primary purpose is to cause sexual arousal (dictionary.com). The SGW forums are not the place for discussing or facilitating criminal activity. This includes arranging to carry out a crime or the posting of illegal images (including copyrighted property).

Consequence:
This will result in the issuing of warning points. Very serious comments will be given more warning points. This will be judged with input from the Forum Administrators and Moderators. In cases of criminal activity the Administrators will not hesitate to contact the authorities.


This is the only rule I could find which would be appropriate. As the drugs mentioned are illegal, discussion of them, even just "I love <insert illegal drug here>" should not be allowed IMO.

Without there being a report or a rule against it, I was not required to mod the thread. I took the OP into consideration and determined that it did not warrant immediate moderation, especially since no one seemed to be upset by it. If there are people upset by it, I welcome them to report it officially and I will address the issue.

If no one would like to follow through with my suggestion, I will take it as nothing more than this thread attempting to start a fire where there may only be smoke.

Well if the point of this thread proves what you said then you are one sorry **Filtered**

Re: appropriateness part 2

Posted: Sun Jul 17, 2011 3:53 pm
by MajorLeeHurts
Eärendil wrote:
MajorLeeHurts wrote:Clearly there is an issue here...

Rules DO speak to illegal substances.

&

can someone get to the point before this thread goes south.

Or is this for the sake of argument...





FTR I am continually amazed by the acceptance of violence and drug use over sexuality and love.





Incorrect. The rules speak of criminal activity. IE: Using Illegal drugs in a country/area where said is illegal



Is Opium not illegal ? is a thread stating opium for someone not depicting activity regarding said opium?

Re: appropriateness part 2

Posted: Sun Jul 17, 2011 3:53 pm
by The Doctor
Jedi~Tank wrote:
Psyko wrote:The mere fact that my posts have been ignored thus far only proves to me one thing: the point of this thread is to complain and does not serve any other purpose (not even to fix the problem).

The only reported post in the Temple today was Nostra reporting his own post.

Haz wrote:
d. Pornographic and criminal content.
Posting anything of a pornographic nature is not permitted on the SGW forums. Pornographic being defined as: Sexually explicit pictures, writing, or other material whose primary purpose is to cause sexual arousal (dictionary.com). The SGW forums are not the place for discussing or facilitating criminal activity. This includes arranging to carry out a crime or the posting of illegal images (including copyrighted property).

Consequence:
This will result in the issuing of warning points. Very serious comments will be given more warning points. This will be judged with input from the Forum Administrators and Moderators. In cases of criminal activity the Administrators will not hesitate to contact the authorities.


This is the only rule I could find which would be appropriate. As the drugs mentioned are illegal, discussion of them, even just "I love <insert illegal drug here>" should not be allowed IMO.

Without there being a report or a rule against it, I was not required to mod the thread. I took the OP into consideration and determined that it did not warrant immediate moderation, especially since no one seemed to be upset by it. If there are people upset by it, I welcome them to report it officially and I will address the issue.

If no one would like to follow through with my suggestion, I will take it as nothing more than this thread attempting to start a fire where there may only be smoke.

Well if the point of this thread proves what you said then you are one sorry **Filtered**


Has the thread been reported yet?

Re: appropriateness part 2

Posted: Sun Jul 17, 2011 3:57 pm
by Psyko
Haz wrote:
Jedi~Tank wrote:
Psyko wrote:The mere fact that my posts have been ignored thus far only proves to me one thing: the point of this thread is to complain and does not serve any other purpose (not even to fix the problem).

The only reported post in the Temple today was Nostra reporting his own post.

Haz wrote:
d. Pornographic and criminal content.
Posting anything of a pornographic nature is not permitted on the SGW forums. Pornographic being defined as: Sexually explicit pictures, writing, or other material whose primary purpose is to cause sexual arousal (dictionary.com). The SGW forums are not the place for discussing or facilitating criminal activity. This includes arranging to carry out a crime or the posting of illegal images (including copyrighted property).

Consequence:
This will result in the issuing of warning points. Very serious comments will be given more warning points. This will be judged with input from the Forum Administrators and Moderators. In cases of criminal activity the Administrators will not hesitate to contact the authorities.


This is the only rule I could find which would be appropriate. As the drugs mentioned are illegal, discussion of them, even just "I love <insert illegal drug here>" should not be allowed IMO.

Without there being a report or a rule against it, I was not required to mod the thread. I took the OP into consideration and determined that it did not warrant immediate moderation, especially since no one seemed to be upset by it. If there are people upset by it, I welcome them to report it officially and I will address the issue.

If no one would like to follow through with my suggestion, I will take it as nothing more than this thread attempting to start a fire where there may only be smoke.

Well if the point of this thread proves what you said then you are one sorry **Filtered**


Has the thread been reported yet?

No.

Re: appropriateness part 2

Posted: Sun Jul 17, 2011 3:57 pm
by muffafuffin
I think its funny that this is just now a complaint. I've been seeing drug related posts the entire time I have been a member of these forums and never before has anyone cared. :-k

Re: appropriateness part 2

Posted: Sun Jul 17, 2011 4:00 pm
by jedi~tank
Ya'll need to use your common sense, just because it isnt reported does not make it acceptable and within the rules, isnt that what your supposed to do? MODERATE THE FORUMS and without your hand being held about it.

Re: appropriateness part 2

Posted: Sun Jul 17, 2011 4:05 pm
by MajorLeeHurts
muffafuffin wrote:I think its funny that this is just now a complaint. I've been seeing drug related posts the entire time I have been a member of these forums and never before has anyone cared. :-k



I dont think this is about drug use or potty mouth as much as it is about double standards. Its just a passive aggressive assault on the mods again Im afraid...

Hence my prior post ...

Get to the point.

Re: appropriateness part 2

Posted: Sun Jul 17, 2011 4:06 pm
by jedi~tank
MajorLeeHurts wrote:
muffafuffin wrote:I think its funny that this is just now a complaint. I've been seeing drug related posts the entire time I have been a member of these forums and never before has anyone cared. :-k



I dont think this is about drug use or potty mouth as much as it is about double standards. Its just a passive aggressive assault on the mods again Im afraid...

Hence my prior post ...

Get to the point.

The point has been made MLH you cant miss it, if you do then..well you do. Read the initial post.

Re: appropriateness part 2

Posted: Sun Jul 17, 2011 4:10 pm
by ~Dä Vinci~
what is this thread about im totally lost reading it.. is jt upset that people use drugs? or people talk about using drugs? or im on on drugs thats why this thread makes no sense ^^

Re: appropriateness part 2

Posted: Sun Jul 17, 2011 4:12 pm
by Noobert
What is with you people lately? I mean, honestly? This is getting a bit absurd.

Are you all that bored you must find something to start a problem for? There have been drug threads before, and they have faded away in the past. The fact you bring this up here after the original topic was locked is not going to help.

All you had to do was PM a Moderator, Global, or Admin to get a clarification or ask that they speak about the rule to come to a decision regarding it and it would have been handled.

Da Vinci, you know better.

Re: appropriateness part 2

Posted: Sun Jul 17, 2011 4:12 pm
by Psyko
Jedi~Tank wrote:Ya'll need to use your common sense, just because it isnt reported does not make it acceptable and within the rules, isnt that what your supposed to do? MODERATE THE FORUMS and without your hand being held about it.

Except that my own judgement came into play. Jack was being Jack and I knew the post to be in total jest. This is not the first drug related thread I have seen on this forum and I never saw them modded before I was hired into the mod team.

I apologize if my personal opinion differs from your own, but I saw no need to mod the topic. I did see reason to discuss the topic with Jack, however. Without people reporting it, I figured everyone on this forum knows Jack and knows what he likes to pull around here and that none of them had a serious problem with it. Had it been reported, I would have done more than simply speak with the OP.

I admit to being brand spanking new to moderation 'round these here parts. I'm still in the learning curve. But it doesn't seem like many of you want to help me do my job better, either.

Today has been nothing but attacks made against moderators for being human and making mistakes in saying the wrong things. We aren't perfect. We screw up in posting for personal reasons, and we sometimes miss things (like what everyone else on a forum is thinking but not saying because they we aren't mind readers and they aren't using the report function).

If a regular user had posted the thread, and not a mod, you would have used the report function (I would hope). But because it was a mod, you skipped the report function and immediately came here to complain about us not doing our jobs.

I'm getting sick of people bringing down mods just because of their positions. Stop it with the special treatment and use the report function. If the thread is not moderated because of the opinion of the mod who dealt with it and you still believe it to be serious, go to the GM or an Admin. Do not come in here and start demanding "what is wrong with you people".

What is wrong with you that you cannot make the effort to hit a button, but can make the effort to create a thread demanding action from us that could have been done by simply reporting the post?

Re: appropriateness part 2

Posted: Sun Jul 17, 2011 4:17 pm
by jedi~tank
Psyko wrote:
Jedi~Tank wrote:Ya'll need to use your common sense, just because it isnt reported does not make it acceptable and within the rules, isnt that what your supposed to do? MODERATE THE FORUMS and without your hand being held about it.

Except that my own judgement came into play. Jack was being Jack and I knew the post to be in total jest. This is not the first drug related thread I have seen on this forum and I never saw them modded before I was hired into the mod team.

I apologize if my personal opinion differs from your own, but I saw no need to mod the topic. I did see reason to discuss the topic with Jack, however. Without people reporting it, I figured everyone on this forum knows Jack and knows what he likes to pull around here and that none of them had a serious problem with it. Had it been reported, I would have done more than simply speak with the OP.

I admit to being brand spanking new to moderation 'round these here parts. I'm still in the learning curve. But it doesn't seem like many of you want to help me do my job better, either.

Today has been nothing but attacks made against moderators for being human and making mistakes in saying the wrong things. We aren't perfect. We screw up in posting for personal reasons, and we sometimes miss things (like what everyone else on a forum is thinking but not saying because they we aren't mind readers and they aren't using the report function).

If a regular user had posted the thread, and not a mod, you would have used the report function (I would hope). But because it was a mod, you skipped the report function and immediately came here to complain about us not doing our jobs.

I'm getting sick of people bringing down mods just because of their positions. Stop it with the special treatment and use the report function. If the thread is not moderated because of the opinion of the mod who dealt with it and you still believe it to be serious, go to the GM or an Admin. Do not come in here and start demanding "what is wrong with you people".

What is wrong with you that you cannot make the effort to hit a button, but can make the effort to create a thread demanding action from us that could have been done by simply reporting the post?

Mo I didnt come here to complain to anyone about how you do your jobs, I asked a question at the end of my post and it escalated into perceived complaining, well my question still stands and Im not complaining, I am asking. So I dont think it proper for you to assume complaining which seems to be the common term you people use when challenged and you are wrong. And this area is talk to the mods direct..not argue over a post. So stop arguing and answer my question.

Re: appropriateness part 2

Posted: Sun Jul 17, 2011 4:23 pm
by Psyko
I figured the answer was clear enough.

They are allowed to exist because there is nothing in the rules against the discussion of drugs on this forum. There have been debate threads regarding the legalization of drugs, there have been other threads purely made in jest, and I'm sure more threads than that in the past (which I was never around for). There is no rule against them. As was said previously in this thread.

They are not moderated because no one reports them or seems to have problems with the threads. Thus, they are allowed to remain in the forum. That is where I went into the "if you've got a problem with them, report them" tangent.

It's up to the Admins to discuss whether or not a rule against them should be put into place.

For the record: "What is the matter with you people" can be classified as a complaint, in my opinion, so I used that particular word. It was not a word that I was advised to use upon receiving my mod-hood.

appropriateness part 2

Posted: Sun Jul 17, 2011 6:05 pm
by Jack
Interestingly enough, the only mention of doing illegal drugs were by those that objected to such mentions.

The ever addicting Coca Cola uses coca leaf extract in it's production and contains trace amounts of cocaine. The coca leaf extract is a by product created when producing cocaine. This is done right here in the U.S., the cocaine is sent to another company in the States for purification. Legally.

Opium is used, legally, to produce morphine. The States is the biggest consumer of legal opium products.