These are the forums for the GateWa.rs family of text-based space-centred PBBGs
https://talk.gatewa.rs/
[BoT] Jack wrote:Juliette wrote:*grin* Well.. wouldn't you like to know what people think you're doing wrong, points to enhance our service at, presented in a civilised and wholesome fashion?I'm sure you're one of the more popular ones..
Calling someone the worst mod, whether they give reasons our not, is not constructive criticism.
spill yr wrath over here
Juliette wrote:Hm, doesn't that say more about the quality of the rest of the posts than it says about Haz' modding?Lithium wrote:overacting for spam where spam is the only thing left in this forum.After all, if you and I are agreed that it's spam, why shouldn't Haz (or any mod for that matter) act against it?
I see your point, it might leave an empty forum, but I get the impression Haz is simply sticking to the rules. Maybe the rules should be subject to admin evaluation; but as long as they are the way they are, spam will be removed.Am I wrong?
E.M.P. wrote:I third the vote for SuperSaiyan.
Lithium wrote:E.M.P. wrote:I third the vote for SuperSaiyan.
isnt this SPAM ?
Eärendil wrote:Lithium wrote:Juliette wrote:Hm, doesn't that say more about the quality of the rest of the posts than it says about Haz' modding?Lithium wrote:overacting for spam where spam is the only thing left in this forum.
I see your point, it might leave an empty forum, but I get the impression Haz is simply sticking to the rules. Maybe the rules should be subject to admin evaluation; but as long as they are the way they are, spam will be removed.
i ve seen alot of spam but no warnings for that does that mean that hes doing the work properly???
if spam shall be removed and users warned then i expect to be done everywhere not where one fits is right.
I was not away that you could see the warnings.
Official ones are not always given and most of the time, especially with spam, verbal warnings will be given the majority of time.
Lithium wrote:Eärendil wrote:Lithium wrote:Juliette wrote:Hm, doesn't that say more about the quality of the rest of the posts than it says about Haz' modding?Lithium wrote:overacting for spam where spam is the only thing left in this forum.
I see your point, it might leave an empty forum, but I get the impression Haz is simply sticking to the rules. Maybe the rules should be subject to admin evaluation; but as long as they are the way they are, spam will be removed.
i ve seen alot of spam but no warnings for that does that mean that hes doing the work properly???
if spam shall be removed and users warned then i expect to be done everywhere not where one fits is right.
I was not away that you could see the warnings.
Official ones are not always given and most of the time, especially with spam, verbal warnings will be given the majority of time.
Board Warning received
This is a warning regarding the following post(s) made by you: viewtopic.php?f=135&t=186668 .
Section 4: Spam
Haz wrote:Lithium wrote:Eärendil wrote:Lithium wrote:Juliette wrote:Hm, doesn't that say more about the quality of the rest of the posts than it says about Haz' modding?Lithium wrote:overacting for spam where spam is the only thing left in this forum.
I see your point, it might leave an empty forum, but I get the impression Haz is simply sticking to the rules. Maybe the rules should be subject to admin evaluation; but as long as they are the way they are, spam will be removed.
i ve seen alot of spam but no warnings for that does that mean that hes doing the work properly???
if spam shall be removed and users warned then i expect to be done everywhere not where one fits is right.
I was not away that you could see the warnings.
Official ones are not always given and most of the time, especially with spam, verbal warnings will be given the majority of time.
Board Warning received
This is a warning regarding the following post(s) made by you: viewtopic.php?f=135&t=186668 .
Section 4: Spam
He meant warnings given to other users, not yourself.
Lithium wrote:Haz wrote:Lithium wrote:Eärendil wrote:Lithium wrote:Juliette wrote:Hm, doesn't that say more about the quality of the rest of the posts than it says about Haz' modding?Lithium wrote:overacting for spam where spam is the only thing left in this forum.
I see your point, it might leave an empty forum, but I get the impression Haz is simply sticking to the rules. Maybe the rules should be subject to admin evaluation; but as long as they are the way they are, spam will be removed.
i ve seen alot of spam but no warnings for that does that mean that hes doing the work properly???
if spam shall be removed and users warned then i expect to be done everywhere not where one fits is right.
I was not away that you could see the warnings.
Official ones are not always given and most of the time, especially with spam, verbal warnings will be given the majority of time.
Board Warning received
This is a warning regarding the following post(s) made by you: viewtopic.php?f=135&t=186668 .
Section 4: Spam
He meant warnings given to other users, not yourself.
how do u know what he meant ??? he didnt even mentioned other users, dont be funny now
Lithium wrote:E.M.P. wrote:I third the vote for SuperSaiyan.
isnt this SPAM ?
Haz wrote:Lithium wrote:Haz wrote:Lithium wrote:Eärendil wrote:Lithium wrote:Juliette wrote:Hm, doesn't that say more about the quality of the rest of the posts than it says about Haz' modding?Lithium wrote:overacting for spam where spam is the only thing left in this forum.
I see your point, it might leave an empty forum, but I get the impression Haz is simply sticking to the rules. Maybe the rules should be subject to admin evaluation; but as long as they are the way they are, spam will be removed.
i ve seen alot of spam but no warnings for that does that mean that hes doing the work properly???
if spam shall be removed and users warned then i expect to be done everywhere not where one fits is right.
I was not away that you could see the warnings.
Official ones are not always given and most of the time, especially with spam, verbal warnings will be given the majority of time.
Board Warning received
This is a warning regarding the following post(s) made by you: viewtopic.php?f=135&t=186668 .
Section 4: Spam
He meant warnings given to other users, not yourself.
how do u know what he meant ??? he didnt even mentioned other users, dont be funny now
It was common sense. And not trying to be funny.
E.M.P. wrote:Lithium wrote:E.M.P. wrote:I third the vote for SuperSaiyan.
isnt this SPAM ?
isnt this topic SPAM ?
Lithium wrote:E.M.P. wrote:Lithium wrote:E.M.P. wrote:I third the vote for SuperSaiyan.
isnt this SPAM ?
isnt this topic SPAM ?
yr post is a clear spam as its not related to the thread , perhaps haz cant see it. If the thread is a spam one then there are more mods then active users to take care of it and many others.
