Page 2 of 15
Re: 5 x 5 (Ricos v Leaf)
Posted: Fri Mar 09, 2012 2:41 pm
by Fallen Gabriel
xDaku wrote:And people ask me why he's had trouble fitting in anywhere
Nice of you,to stop by,and read our post......Nice from .YOU...FS...BOYS.......
Re: 5 x 5 (Ricos v Leaf)
Posted: Fri Mar 09, 2012 2:42 pm
by Bromas
You guys know you put 5 x 5 instead of 5v5 right?
Re: 5 x 5 (Ricos v Leaf)
Posted: Fri Mar 09, 2012 2:58 pm
by Fallen Gabriel
~Wolverine~ wrote:Fallen Gabriel wrote:~Wolverine~ wrote:Fallen Gabriel wrote:IFLuX wrote:DucknDive wrote:Terms:
Last 1 week
No Planets
No Officers
No alliance interference
No Ascended
last one week <--- hmm ok..
No Planets<---- well this is **Filtered** ricos has some nice duals they can loss
NO officer<---- good term
no allinace<---- -II-
No ascended<---- **Filtered**!
Happy huntin!
No IFluX in thread.......epic......good night you!!
i was wondering for 5 mins why you had 5t out hahaha =D
~W
Do you really want to know?
[/q
Simple.......FG didnt do **Filtered** in massing...............I FALLEN GABRIEL WOULD LIKE TO THANK ADM AND ITS BUGS FOR OUTMOST FUN I HAD IN 30 MINUTES,WHILE FULLY CHARGET WITH UP TO 400T OUT ( yeap wolwy),AND NOT ABLE TO HIT A SINGLE SHOT ON MY TARGETS.YOU ADM ARE BY FAR THE BEST FRIENDS I HAVE.....SO I HOPE YOU WOULDNT MIND IF I VISIT ANY OF YOU WHEN I SEE YOU......I TRULLY LOVE FOREVER PEACE SETTING WITH EVERYONE.......WOOOOOO I ROCK!!!!!
Re: 5 v 5 (Ricos v Leaf)
Posted: Fri Mar 09, 2012 3:09 pm
by Almost38
weeeeeeeeeeeeeeee
Re: 5 x 5 (Ricos v Leaf)
Posted: Fri Mar 09, 2012 3:13 pm
by xDaku
Fallen Gabriel wrote:xDaku wrote:And people ask me why he's had trouble fitting in anywhere
Nice of you,to stop by,and read our post......Nice from .YOU...FS...BOYS.......
Always available to honor you with my presence
Re: 5 v 5 (Ricos v Leaf)
Posted: Fri Mar 09, 2012 3:34 pm
by LightningXIII
It's a shame I couldn't play this time, GL guys.
Re: 5 v 5 (Ricos v Leaf)
Posted: Fri Mar 09, 2012 4:07 pm
by harchester
Rock on Ricos
Re: 5 v 5 (Ricos v Leaf)
Posted: Fri Mar 09, 2012 5:15 pm
by Loki™
Really guys? Just when I started saving for cov 39
Btw I think ZERO is not active atm.
Re: 5 v 5 (Ricos v Leaf)
Posted: Fri Mar 09, 2012 5:18 pm
by pressuremc
go ricos GL boys wipe the floor with em
Re: 5 v 5 (Ricos v Leaf)
Posted: Fri Mar 09, 2012 5:23 pm
by Juliette
Go Loki!
Re: 5 v 5 (Ricos v Leaf)
Posted: Fri Mar 09, 2012 5:53 pm
by MEZZANINE
I applaud the use of Team Battles to settle a score, but generally alliances get to pick their own teams to ensure a fair fight with active players, and start/end times & rules are agreed by BOTH sides before any massings start.
Have fun all
And LV, kick some Rico bootie
Re: 5 v 5 (Ricos v Leaf)
Posted: Fri Mar 09, 2012 6:23 pm
by ~Tziki~
Eärendil wrote:Loki™ wrote:Really guys? Just when I started saving for cov 39
Btw I think ZERO is not active atm.
Zero is in the process of moving into his own place.
we picked your top players (judging by stats etc) had no way of knowing who is available etc. I Personally massed ZERO due to an old bit of bad blood but despite that he was already in the lineup, i just called shotgun
Re: 5 x 5 (Ricos v Leaf)
Posted: Fri Mar 09, 2012 7:01 pm
by Mathlord
Andy! wrote:"we are allied with DDE, we were gonna hit taf but some ppl are slackign atm FS is pointless and would end in a stupid long war"
Oh?
Re: 5 v 5 (Ricos v Leaf)
Posted: Fri Mar 09, 2012 7:20 pm
by ƒëmmë
who is the we Andy?? HVE or SoT?? and why would it be DDE hitting TAF when its OE at wr with them
So Almost another Ricos adventure?? is that Almost=harhicans or Almost=38?
Anyway have fun ppl,
Re: 5 v 5 (Ricos v Leaf)
Posted: Fri Mar 09, 2012 7:23 pm
by ~Odin~
~Tziki~ wrote:Eärendil wrote:Loki™ wrote:Really guys? Just when I started saving for cov 39
Btw I think ZERO is not active atm.
Zero is in the process of moving into his own place.
we picked your top players (judging by stats etc) had no way of knowing who is available etc.
That is why group A chats to alliance B so they can form a group that would put up an equal fight allowing the situation to be alot more fun.