Page 2 of 4

Re: Complaint against Haz

Posted: Tue Mar 20, 2012 10:14 am
by Field Marshall
T-X wrote:1. 'nez de coq' is a well known French comedic item. Cultural unawareness is no valid reason to back up a warning.
2. 'coqnose' is an intentional change in spelling to prevent using more French (which, as you so elegantly demonstrated, is against the rules), and says 'nez de coq', see 1.
3. The only correct translation for the French word 'coq' is 'rooster'. The phonetic similarity to the English slang is undesirable, but an unfortunate coincidence. Blame William of Normandy, if you must.
4. The verbal warning for 'fermez ta bouche' is extremely valid. In this case, non-English is used without translation.

Also:
Behave. Any non-English without translation hereafter will be awarded a warning.


So in your professional capacity as another competent mod, please can you inform me if you genuinely believe that this is worth of a board warning?

I apologise to this aspect, I meant to carry on with a language, not to mask any profanity. If this looked like masking and people took a different way to which it was intended, I also apologise for this.

Re: Complaint against Haz

Posted: Tue Mar 20, 2012 10:14 am
by Quina Quen
I'd like a glass of cava, thank you.

Re: Complaint against Haz

Posted: Tue Mar 20, 2012 10:16 am
by Drought
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=omEQkuexcMk


I googled that word to find some form of definition of the word, generally, it will lead to some obscure definition, but I couldnt find any. (Even with some wild variation)

Aparently, that word is used a lot for profile names on various respected sites.


On the other hand, http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aOtqy7qwq5I

Apart from it meaning the obvious, its also a name of a movie ^_^

Re: Complaint against Haz

Posted: Tue Mar 20, 2012 10:16 am
by Guild
haz is gettin carried away all over of late tbh,

mass him ingame fm , in cloud under the doctor :)

Re: Complaint against Haz

Posted: Tue Mar 20, 2012 10:18 am
by The Doctor
T-X wrote:1. 'nez de coq' is a well known French comedic item. Cultural unawareness is no valid reason to back up a warning.
2. 'coqnose' is an intentional change in spelling to prevent using more French (which, as you so elegantly demonstrated, is against the rules), and says 'nez de coq', see 1.
3. The only correct translation for the French word 'coq' is 'rooster'. The phonetic similarity to the English slang is undesirable, but an unfortunate coincidence. Blame William of Normandy, if you must.
4. The verbal warning for 'fermez ta bouche' is extremely valid. In this case, non-English is used without translation.

Also:
Behave. Any non-English without translation hereafter will be awarded a warning.


As mentioned in the PM, given the context:

smash this coqnose


  1. Does that really seem like a reference to a french comedy item?
  2. As for "intentional change of spelling to prevent using more french", that text was there before I warned him. If he knew not to use french in his post, then why did he use it in the first place? Point 2 is invalid.
  3. Rooster may also be called "**Filtered**" but that doesn't stop people from using it in a profane manner. In the context of his post, it seems like he is saying "smash this **Filtered** nose" much like someone would say "smash this **Filtered** head". Definitely doesn't seem like he is saying "smash this <french comedy item>".

Re: Complaint against Haz

Posted: Tue Mar 20, 2012 10:22 am
by ~wolverine~
Guild wrote:haz is gettin carried away all over of late tbh,

mass him ingame fm , in cloud under the doctor :)


rofl forums are made to piss people off, and just mass em ingame if they warn you for the lulz

better not be you clarkey who warns me :P

yea cava sounds good general riv

Re: Complaint against Haz

Posted: Tue Mar 20, 2012 10:25 am
by Field Marshall
Haz wrote:smash this coqnose


If it's so bad, then why would you allow it to get through the word filter by quoting it? Are you not responsible for the content of your posts now?

Unless you now feel it is justified?

Re: Complaint against Haz

Posted: Tue Mar 20, 2012 10:25 am
by MEZZANINE
1) Much inconsistency in filtering, what words and acronyms can or cant be used

Crap seems to be allowed, yet it means the same as the S word which is not

Things like FUALL were allowed, yet the F word represented is not

2) Much inconsistency in Modding, always has been. Some Mods have been bias at times using the rules against those the dont like, but far more common is the fact that some Mods are more hardline than others ( you could call this diligence or pettiness depending on your personal point of view ), some mods will walk on by a comment when others will warn for it.

3) Haz, you are one of the hardline mods I refer to above, I have personally been warned by you before and told you to stuff it due to it's pettiness, Im sure I wasnt the first and Im certain I wont be the last. I think you need to chill out and think before you hand out warnings. I would be curious if there are stats showing how many warning are issued by each mod, and in what time period. I would bet heavily you give out more warnings per hour of activity than any other mod.

4) Anyone who thinks that kids who are old enough to have internet access havent heard and seen things far worse than a swear word is deluded. Wwearing and insults can be used in funny & expressive ways without being offensive, it's more about the context and intent than the words themselves.

5) I do think everyone should speak English............. not just here but everywhere, worldwide and at all times lol

Re: Complaint against Haz

Posted: Tue Mar 20, 2012 10:29 am
by The Doctor
~Wolverine~ wrote:
Guild wrote:haz is gettin carried away all over of late tbh,

mass him ingame fm , in cloud under the doctor :)


rofl forums are made to piss people off, and just mass em ingame if they warn you for the lulz

better not be you clarkey who warns me :P

yea cava sounds good general riv


Massing me for doing my job... wow... Or he could do the right thing, and appeal his warnings... oh wait, whats this? He's doing it now :D

If he wants to, he's still got a free vendetta waiting for him from quite a while back :P

Haz wrote:Also, Field Marshall, give us a shout if you wish for a 1v1 in the future :)


Field Marshall wrote:If it's so bad, then why would you allow it to get through the word filter by quoting it? Are you not responsible for the content of your posts now?

Unless you now feel it is justified?


Unless I'm much mistaken, its allowed within Ombudsman Corner for both sides for the purposes of appealing.

Re: Complaint against Haz

Posted: Tue Mar 20, 2012 10:29 am
by Bromas
In the case of LMAO, the poster could be reffering to the band "LMAO" in which it stands for "Loving My Friends And Others" (Mezz said that acronym allowed it through the filter)

Re: Complaint against Haz

Posted: Tue Mar 20, 2012 10:29 am
by ~Dä Vinci~
all my warnings are mainly from haz for petty things makes forums less enjoyable barley say anything without a warning.. il probs get 1 for this.

Re: Complaint against Haz

Posted: Tue Mar 20, 2012 10:36 am
by Field Marshall
Generally speaking Haz, you are a very proficent mod. I've given you praise in the past for making hardline decisions.

Today, you made a seemingly biased decision. Prehaps justifiable with the use of rules, if you try REALLY hard.

This was not an example of you using discretion or using common sense and this is reflected by many comments throughout this thread.

On top of the verbal warning the other day, you failed to give me an answer to that. Therefore, I will now use this as further evidence to my case:

[spoiler]
Field Marshall wrote:
Haz wrote:Subject: How do you fund covert 38 (and higher)?

Field Marshall wrote:
Field Marshall wrote:
ربهالنوع wrote:Also. A mere 200$ gets you there.
One could cough once and get that.


Try http://xytex.com/


Why was my post posted as spam and Juliette's wasn't then? :shock:


Which post of Juliettes?


The same one I am quoting :)
[/spoiler]

You never replied to this. Sure, I was being an idiot and posted up a dumb link, but I bet all my warnings I can go find 20 dumb links in the GC.

She named suggestions to get level 38, I merely suggested a support to her post.

Re: Complaint against Haz

Posted: Tue Mar 20, 2012 10:38 am
by The Doctor
MEZZANINE wrote:1) Much inconsistency in filtering, what words and acronyms can or cant be used

Crap seems to be allowed, yet it means the same as the S word which is not

Things like FUALL were allowed, yet the F word represented is not

2) Much inconsistency in Modding, always has been. Some Mods have been bias at times using the rules against those the dont like, but far more common is the fact that some Mods are more hardline than others ( you could call this diligence or pettiness depending on your personal point of view ), some mods will walk on by a comment when others will warn for it.

3) Haz, you are one of the hardline mods I refer to above, I have personally been warned by you before and told you to stuff it due to it's pettiness, Im sure I wasnt the first and Im certain I wont be the last. I think you need to chill out and think before you hand out warnings. I would be curious if there are stats showing how many warning are issued by each mod, and in what time period. I would bet heavily you give out more warnings per hour of activity than any other mod.

4) Anyone who thinks that kids who are old enough to have internet access havent heard and seen things far worse than a swear word is deluded. Wwearing and insults can be used in funny & expressive ways without being offensive, it's more about the context and intent than the words themselves.

5) I do think everyone should speak English............. not just here but everywhere, worldwide and at all times lol


  1. Some are considered less offensive than others. Think of what you see on TV. Would you hear "**Filtered**" on a daytime TV show? If they needed to use such a word, they usually bleep it out (filter it) or replace it with another word, "crap".
  2. I see myself as one who isn't gonna be scared to mod a user. One who is more active, and therefore it gives more opportunities to irritate those I warn (rightfully or not)

    I'll quote deni here:

    deni wrote:General and especially the GC is the most heated section on this forum.

    As a General mod, one has 2 choices: take a kind of a back seat and avoid to mod controversial topics OR step up without being afraid of getting into the crossfire and actively mod topics that need modding.

    Usually, the general mods who choose the first option, are considered "good" mods by the general public - after all, if you do not mod actively, there is a slim chance to make a mistake or or step on an user's wrong foot.

    The ones who actually mod (like Haz), have the unthankful job of never ever being able to "please" everyone. The general public considers them "bad" mods as they have complaints filed against them etc.

    They are the ones who keep the forum running though, remember that ;)

~Dä Vinci~ wrote:all my warnings are mainly from haz for petty things makes forums less enjoyable barley say anything without a warning.. il probs get 1 for this.


Why didn't you appeal them if you believe this? Also, maybe, I don't know... I can't mod this section, so it's not my decision.

Andy! wrote:In the case of LMAO, the poster could be reffering to the band "LMAO" in which it stands for "Loving My Friends And Others" (Mezz said that acronym allowed it through the filter)


As you can see, the filter kicked in and replaced it with a version minus the "F".

Anywhos, this is about FM's warning, not anyone elses.

[spoiler=FM's recent post]
Field Marshall wrote:Generally speaking Haz, you are a very proficent mod. I've given you praise in the past for making hardline decisions.

Today, you made a seemingly biased decision. Prehaps justifiable with the use of rules, if you try REALLY hard.

This was not an example of you using discretion or using common sense and this is reflected by many comments throughout this thread.

On top of the verbal warning the other day, you failed to give me an answer to that. Therefore, I will now use this as further evidence to my case:

[spoiler]
Field Marshall wrote:
Haz wrote:Subject: How do you fund covert 38 (and higher)?

Field Marshall wrote:
Field Marshall wrote:
ربهالنوع wrote:Also. A mere 200$ gets you there.
One could cough once and get that.


Try http://xytex.com/


Why was my post posted as spam and Juliette's wasn't then? :shock:


Which post of Juliettes?


The same one I am quoting :)
[/spoiler]

You never replied to this. Sure, I was being an idiot and posted up a dumb link, but I bet all my warnings I can go find 20 dumb links in the GC.

She named suggestions to get level 38, I merely suggested a support to her post.
[/spoiler]

Oops sorry about that, I read that PM on my phone and didn't get time to reply, and forgot about it by the time I got to my laptop. See incoming PM.

Re: Complaint against Haz

Posted: Tue Mar 20, 2012 10:44 am
by Quina Quen
I got one yesterday. I like them from Haz though, they excite me in a weird twisted sexual way.

Re: Complaint against Haz

Posted: Tue Mar 20, 2012 10:49 am
by MEZZANINE
Since two acronyms Im sure I used before now get replaced with letters missing Im curious whats allowed now so Im gonna go all pottymouth for a minute to see what words get through lol

Going alphabetical so you'll have to guess the ones blocked, if you cant guess them you got a very clean mind... well done, if you guess them all you got a dirty mind, and if you can think of ones I missed you mind is filthy lol

A
Arse
*Filtered*
B
Bastard
**Filtered**
Bugger
C
Crap
**Filtered**
Cunny
D
**Filtered**
**Filtered**
F
**Filtered**
**Filtered**
**Filtered**
J
Jackoff
K
Knob
L
Limpdick
M
**Filtered**
P
Prat
Prick
**Filtered**
S
**Filtered**
**Filtered**
**Filtered**
Slapper
**Filtered**
Snatch
T
**Filtered**
W
**Filtered**
**Filtered**