Page 2 of 4

Re: Considering a temporary alliance.

Posted: Sat Feb 16, 2013 4:05 pm
by R8
i like this, thanks for paintingyourself as a target of an easy farm. and on my farm list ;)

a piece of advice. your account is a prior, are you new to this game? how about some ascending etc? you going to build all these income planets etc. you have a poor account so why would you want so much income before you have reached higher ascencions.

go farm some, ppt is the only way to protect anything in this game. all else is up for grabs.

enjoy :)

Re: Considering a temporary alliance.

Posted: Sat Feb 16, 2013 4:15 pm
by Cwalen
@ R8 think big, little brother.

Like I am not already being farmed to hell.

Anyone who fails to notice that, has what general "storming" Norman Swartscof <sp> would have called "lacking a 1 on 1 relationship with reality."

So join the party, PM me with something nice, and I'll even go to war with you so you can pick up my scraps for only 9 turns a hit.

I am simply looking for a Heset house alliance to make an offer, if they dare to dream.

Re: Considering a temporary alliance.

Posted: Sat Feb 16, 2013 4:32 pm
by KOS
if you got that kind of naq you should be able to f=defend yourself...?

Re: Considering a temporary alliance.

Posted: Sat Feb 16, 2013 4:50 pm
by Cwalen
Again, KOS, little brother.

And I do use that term advisably, with all the insult and hope for the future that it contains.

You think that this free gift that I offer in public is a mistake?

Farm, farm well, send me a nice PM and I'll war to your war and you can farm even cheaper.

Like my 1296 000 000 000 a day income isn't already being farmed.

I get what I get when I am under PPT.

Unless someone is paying me for farming rights, you are as good as the next fella for taking the NAQ.
Just kindly take your puerile drivel out of my recruitment thread.

Is farming me not enough? do you need to expose your own ignorance with insults and spam up my thread as well?

Re: Considering a temporary alliance.

Posted: Sat Feb 16, 2013 4:51 pm
by SuperSaiyan
You should check out talamasca

Re: Considering a temporary alliance.

Posted: Sat Feb 16, 2013 4:54 pm
by Cwalen
+1

I am just waving my bits in the wind and sorting through the opportunistic and the ignorant.

talamasca is looking good.

Re: Considering a temporary alliance.

Posted: Sat Feb 16, 2013 5:26 pm
by KOS
if you think someone can keep everyone from hitting you, then you my friend are ignorant... im off this thread.

Re: Considering a temporary alliance.

Posted: Sat Feb 16, 2013 5:28 pm
by Juliette
KOS wrote:if you think someone can keep everyone from hitting you, then you my friend are ignorant... im off this thread.
No one can, and he is not looking for a 100% protection, at least the way I imagine. ;)

Re: Considering a temporary alliance.

Posted: Sat Feb 16, 2013 6:06 pm
by SuperSaiyan
Cwalen wrote:+1

I am just waving my bits in the wind and sorting through the opportunistic and the ignorant.

talamasca is looking good.

If you say so

Re: Considering a temporary alliance.

Posted: Sat Feb 16, 2013 6:09 pm
by xDaku
He's looking for "some protection" while he also claims he "doesn't mind people farming him".

People aren't being ignorant, and if you think that you've got more than one thing stuck up your ass. They're laughing at the inconsistency of everything you say.

Re: Considering a temporary alliance.

Posted: Sat Feb 16, 2013 6:37 pm
by Cwalen
Well given my ignorance, there is no doubt reason for some to laugh at some of what I say.

Frankly this whole thread is looking a little laughable right now.

I was unaware of the cost before I posted it. Through having posted it I am better informed. (see .sig below)

Talamasca is looking good, well up in the top three for PM involvement, and offering insight and information.

I am unaware of the conflict between being "up for people farming me" and looking for "some protection"
People do farm me. I am used to it, I would like some protection so that the NAQ goes to friendlies not the mob.
Shower me with your wisdom xDaku? What is logically inconsistent with the acceptance of the inevitability of being farmed and the desire to gain some return from it?

Dream with me for a moment, dream of a world where a high yield farm can enter into a symbiotic relationship with an alliance. The first such relationship yields 2 trillion a week, the second another two, with a hundred it is 200 trillion.

It's only a dream, and this thread was only asking if it was possible.
200 trillion a week? Turn your nose up at that!
Some people _are_ ignorant.

Thinking that you are a clever clogs because you noticed my farm from this thread?
Well join the que of farmers.
Advising me to get some defense?
<looks shocked!> I obtained a 7 trillion a week income excluding my farming, and I just noticed that! <laughs>

Seriously people, I cant stop anyone spamming this thread. I would prefer to only have to read responses from people that have something to say that was worth at least their own time typing it,

Re: Considering a temporary alliance.

Posted: Sat Feb 16, 2013 10:35 pm
by xDaku
Save the "I have a dream" speech. If you believe talamasca can offer you protection, go for it. They can offer a lot of things, but protection isn't one of them. :roll:

Re: Considering a temporary alliance.

Posted: Sat Feb 16, 2013 10:40 pm
by Cwalen
Rational conversation is a heck of a turn on for me.

xDaku? got milk?

Re: Considering a temporary alliance.

Posted: Sat Feb 16, 2013 10:43 pm
by doc holliday
Try ur ur ur alliance. They r your best bet for protection.

Re: Considering a temporary alliance.

Posted: Sat Feb 16, 2013 10:46 pm
by Juliette
xDaku wrote:Save the "I have a dream" speech. If you believe talamasca can offer you protection, go for it. They can offer a lot of things, but protection isn't one of them. :roll:
Thanks for acknowledging the 'lot of things', for better or worse. ;)
Cwalen wrote:Rational conversation is a heck of a turn on for me.
We, well.. Jim, Clegane and myself at least, do have some conversational skills. :-)

xDaku is right in that the protection would be rather limited. Unaligned and minor punks, sure..