Page 2 of 8

Re: Heavy Horse vs AG thor - Ascended

Posted: Wed Jan 22, 2014 11:05 am
by Kjarkur
My memory might be failing me here... but didn't it happen some time ago that Thor was supposedly not TAF then few weeks later he was ?

Re: Heavy Horse vs AG thor - Ascended

Posted: Wed Jan 22, 2014 11:12 am
by ~Tziki~
Lokiā„¢ wrote:
Mathlord wrote:
Zod14c wrote:Where is Mathlord to cry about this vendetta??

:smt043
Thor ain't TAF ;)
We both know that ain't really true.
we all do :P

...

dammit loki **Filtered** off and stop making me agree with you!

Re: Heavy Horse vs AG thor - Ascended

Posted: Wed Jan 22, 2014 12:11 pm
by Mathlord
Kjarkur wrote:My memory might be failing me here... but didn't it happen some time ago that Thor was supposedly not TAF then few weeks later he was ?
If you want to know why Thor really left TAF, you are welcome to come find me on skype. Now is not the time time or place.

@Zod14c I have a problem with people that declare vendettas as a way to get around NAPs, so as a standard operating procedure, I don't approve of them. I had special disdain for the Tearjerker/Tokko thread because the whole thing was a big joke. I find it comical that OE attempted to punish their members for random massing by gifting them more massing targets while they refused to build anything themselves over a 5 tril defense. If it was to be real punishment, their leadership should have mandated that they build matching defenses to the challengers and have a real fair go at it, but that was not happening in that thread.

While Thor is not a member of TAF, I still wish him well in completely demolishing everything you hold dear Heavy Horse.

Re: Heavy Horse vs AG thor - Ascended

Posted: Wed Jan 22, 2014 1:01 pm
by dgb
taf rules all, gl ag you dont need it thoe with these lesser gods.

Re: Heavy Horse vs AG thor - Ascended

Posted: Wed Jan 22, 2014 1:16 pm
by Heavy Horse
After i destroyed Thor's 150 quad strike and defence yesterday his cronies come to his aid, your an embarrassment to your alliance *Shiva.

Re: Heavy Horse vs AG thor - Ascended

Posted: Wed Jan 22, 2014 1:24 pm
by Norbe
Heavy Horse wrote:After i destroyed Thor's 150 quad strike and defence yesterday his cronies come to his aid, your an embarrassment to your alliance *Shiva.
:smt047

OFIS rules.

*Shiva for president!

~Norbe~

Re: Heavy Horse vs AG thor - Ascended

Posted: Wed Jan 22, 2014 1:33 pm
by dgb
Norbe wrote:
Heavy Horse wrote:After i destroyed Thor's 150 quad strike and defence yesterday his cronies come to his aid, your an embarrassment to your alliance *Shiva.
:smt047

OFIS rules.

*Shiva for president!

~Norbe~
Always nice to have friends Heavy Donkey ul on that.

Re: Heavy Horse vs AG thor - Ascended

Posted: Wed Jan 22, 2014 2:37 pm
by Zod14c
Mathlord wrote:
Kjarkur wrote:My memory might be failing me here... but didn't it happen some time ago that Thor was supposedly not TAF then few weeks later he was ?
If you want to know why Thor really left TAF, you are welcome to come find me on skype. Now is not the time time or place.

@Zod14c I have a problem with people that declare vendettas as a way to get around NAPs, so as a standard operating procedure, I don't approve of them. I had special disdain for the Tearjerker/Tokko thread because the whole thing was a big joke. I find it comical that OE attempted to punish their members for random massing by gifting them more massing targets while they refused to build anything themselves over a 5 tril defense. If it was to be real punishment, their leadership should have mandated that they build matching defenses to the challengers and have a real fair go at it, but that was not happening in that thread.

While Thor is not a member of TAF, I still wish him well in completely demolishing everything you hold dear Heavy Horse.
I knew it was in there somewhere :)

Well from my experience it's normally something to do with players breaking NAPs in the first place, then trying to hide behind daddy when they get found out.

Less said about that other vendetta thread the better... :smt105

Just for some relevance... go Heavy Horse =D>

Re: Heavy Horse vs AG thor - Ascended

Posted: Wed Jan 22, 2014 4:04 pm
by ~Coyle~
Heavy Horse wrote:After i destroyed Thor's 150 quad strike and defence yesterday his cronies come to his aid, your an embarrassment to your alliance *Shiva.
Well he needs the help it seems HH :-D

Have fun against OFIS/TAF or whatever they are

Re: Heavy Horse vs AG thor - Ascended

Posted: Wed Jan 22, 2014 4:29 pm
by Guild
~Coyle~ wrote:
Heavy Horse wrote:After i destroyed Thor's 150 quad strike and defence yesterday his cronies come to his aid, your an embarrassment to your alliance *Shiva.
Well he needs the help it seems HH :-D

Have fun against OFIS/TAF or whatever they are
the way the OFIS guys play it could very well have just been him but on another account "watching it for him" :-#

Re: Heavy Horse vs AG thor - Ascended

Posted: Wed Jan 22, 2014 5:11 pm
by Heavy Horse
Name: *Ancient Thor
UnNamed of the ORI
Plane: Normal Reality
Commander: None
Race Name: The Ancient
Rank: 23,196
Army Size:
Treasury: Naquadah
Fortifications: Galactic Military Complexes
Relation (yours/theirs) Neutral / Neutral

God: *Shiva
Main Realm Identification Number: 1991568

Obviously run out of turns on your other account so you hit me with this one. Sad.

Re: Heavy Horse vs AG thor - Ascended

Posted: Wed Jan 22, 2014 6:18 pm
by ~Odin~
Norbe wrote:
Heavy Horse wrote:After i destroyed Thor's 150 quad strike and defence yesterday his cronies come to his aid, your an embarrassment to your alliance *Shiva.
:smt047

OFIS rules.

*Shiva for president!

~Norbe~
So you are condoning players jumping in on this vendetta? Naughty Norbe.
Nice to see another aussie in action Heavy ^_^

Re: Heavy Horse vs AG thor - Ascended

Posted: Wed Jan 22, 2014 7:10 pm
by Gandy 181
Mathlord wrote:
Kjarkur wrote:My memory might be failing me here... but didn't it happen some time ago that Thor was supposedly not TAF then few weeks later he was ?
If you want to know why Thor really left TAF, you are welcome to come find me on skype. Now is not the time time or place.

@Zod14c I have a problem with people that declare vendettas as a way to get around NAPs, so as a standard operating procedure, I don't approve of them. I had special disdain for the Tearjerker/Tokko thread because the whole thing was a big joke. I find it comical that OE attempted to punish their members for random massing by gifting them more massing targets while they refused to build anything themselves over a 5 tril defense. If it was to be real punishment, their leadership should have mandated that they build matching defenses to the challengers and have a real fair go at it, but that was not happening in that thread.

While Thor is not a member of TAF, I still wish him well in completely demolishing everything you hold dear Heavy Horse.

Regarding what OE HC has told tokko and tearjerker

is none of ur business but u keep seeming to try make it your business

u seem to be as bad as guild for being against OE

u knw my ID

i agreee any vendy u want math if u wanna keep running ur mouth

Anyhow gd luck HH kick his ass

Re: Heavy Horse vs AG thor - Ascended

Posted: Wed Jan 22, 2014 8:35 pm
by Mathlord
:smt043

As is noted by the presence of half the alliances of stargatewars here, there isn't really a "stay out of our business" rule when it comes to this forum in 2014. Or 2005 for that matter. There is no reason for me to keep my mouth shut about the lunacy seen in this game. The only way someone can choose to shut someone else's mouth is by force...a lot of force...and you know that won't work. Ah well...if you were truly serious about your aggressive tones, you wouldn't be so friendly away from the forum where you and your buddies want to thump your chest and try to remind the little ones ingame that your empire is still kinda scary to those that are semi-active.

You can choose to think that I'm against your empire, but I have no reason to be against anyone unless you make it my business *lol* to be. Until such a point, if you really had valid points about your alliance member's actions or behavior, you wouldn't resort to threatening violence to make your point. You'd just prove me wrong.

Re: Heavy Horse vs AG thor - Ascended

Posted: Thu Jan 23, 2014 3:32 am
by Guild
Mathlord wrote::smt043

As is noted by the presence of half the alliances of stargatewars here, there isn't really a "stay out of our business" rule when it comes to this forum in 2014. Or 2005 for that matter. There is no reason for me to keep my mouth shut about the lunacy seen in this game. The only way someone can choose to shut someone else's mouth is by force...a lot of force...and you know that won't work. Ah well...if you were truly serious about your aggressive tones, you wouldn't be so friendly away from the forum where you and your buddies want to thump your chest and try to remind the little ones ingame that your empire is still kinda scary to those that are semi-active.

You can choose to think that I'm against your empire, but I have no reason to be against anyone unless you make it my business *lol* to be. Until such a point, if you really had valid points about your alliance member's actions or behavior, you wouldn't resort to threatening violence to make your point. You'd just prove me wrong.
to be fair TA is semi inactive...