Re: Heavy Horse vs AG thor - Ascended
Posted: Wed Jan 22, 2014 11:05 am
My memory might be failing me here... but didn't it happen some time ago that Thor was supposedly not TAF then few weeks later he was ?
These are the forums for the GateWa.rs family of text-based space-centred PBBGs
https://talk.gatewa.rs/
we all doLoki⢠wrote:We both know that ain't really true.Mathlord wrote:Thor ain't TAFZod14c wrote:Where is Mathlord to cry about this vendetta??
If you want to know why Thor really left TAF, you are welcome to come find me on skype. Now is not the time time or place.Kjarkur wrote:My memory might be failing me here... but didn't it happen some time ago that Thor was supposedly not TAF then few weeks later he was ?
Heavy Horse wrote:After i destroyed Thor's 150 quad strike and defence yesterday his cronies come to his aid, your an embarrassment to your alliance *Shiva.
Always nice to have friends Heavy Donkey ul on that.Norbe wrote:Heavy Horse wrote:After i destroyed Thor's 150 quad strike and defence yesterday his cronies come to his aid, your an embarrassment to your alliance *Shiva.
OFIS rules.
*Shiva for president!
~Norbe~
I knew it was in there somewhereMathlord wrote:If you want to know why Thor really left TAF, you are welcome to come find me on skype. Now is not the time time or place.Kjarkur wrote:My memory might be failing me here... but didn't it happen some time ago that Thor was supposedly not TAF then few weeks later he was ?
@Zod14c I have a problem with people that declare vendettas as a way to get around NAPs, so as a standard operating procedure, I don't approve of them. I had special disdain for the Tearjerker/Tokko thread because the whole thing was a big joke. I find it comical that OE attempted to punish their members for random massing by gifting them more massing targets while they refused to build anything themselves over a 5 tril defense. If it was to be real punishment, their leadership should have mandated that they build matching defenses to the challengers and have a real fair go at it, but that was not happening in that thread.
While Thor is not a member of TAF, I still wish him well in completely demolishing everything you hold dear Heavy Horse.
Well he needs the help it seems HHHeavy Horse wrote:After i destroyed Thor's 150 quad strike and defence yesterday his cronies come to his aid, your an embarrassment to your alliance *Shiva.
the way the OFIS guys play it could very well have just been him but on another account "watching it for him"~Coyle~ wrote:Well he needs the help it seems HHHeavy Horse wrote:After i destroyed Thor's 150 quad strike and defence yesterday his cronies come to his aid, your an embarrassment to your alliance *Shiva.![]()
Have fun against OFIS/TAF or whatever they are
So you are condoning players jumping in on this vendetta? Naughty Norbe.Norbe wrote:Heavy Horse wrote:After i destroyed Thor's 150 quad strike and defence yesterday his cronies come to his aid, your an embarrassment to your alliance *Shiva.
OFIS rules.
*Shiva for president!
~Norbe~
Mathlord wrote:If you want to know why Thor really left TAF, you are welcome to come find me on skype. Now is not the time time or place.Kjarkur wrote:My memory might be failing me here... but didn't it happen some time ago that Thor was supposedly not TAF then few weeks later he was ?
@Zod14c I have a problem with people that declare vendettas as a way to get around NAPs, so as a standard operating procedure, I don't approve of them. I had special disdain for the Tearjerker/Tokko thread because the whole thing was a big joke. I find it comical that OE attempted to punish their members for random massing by gifting them more massing targets while they refused to build anything themselves over a 5 tril defense. If it was to be real punishment, their leadership should have mandated that they build matching defenses to the challengers and have a real fair go at it, but that was not happening in that thread.
While Thor is not a member of TAF, I still wish him well in completely demolishing everything you hold dear Heavy Horse.
to be fair TA is semi inactive...Mathlord wrote:![]()
As is noted by the presence of half the alliances of stargatewars here, there isn't really a "stay out of our business" rule when it comes to this forum in 2014. Or 2005 for that matter. There is no reason for me to keep my mouth shut about the lunacy seen in this game. The only way someone can choose to shut someone else's mouth is by force...a lot of force...and you know that won't work. Ah well...if you were truly serious about your aggressive tones, you wouldn't be so friendly away from the forum where you and your buddies want to thump your chest and try to remind the little ones ingame that your empire is still kinda scary to those that are semi-active.
You can choose to think that I'm against your empire, but I have no reason to be against anyone unless you make it my business *lol* to be. Until such a point, if you really had valid points about your alliance member's actions or behavior, you wouldn't resort to threatening violence to make your point. You'd just prove me wrong.