Page 2 of 2
Posted: Thu Apr 06, 2006 12:54 pm
by KnightValor
Sounds good to me...
*waits for thread to lay forgotten for years & years*
Posted: Thu Apr 06, 2006 1:04 pm
by [KMA]Avenger
Wolf359 wrote:Cheops wrote:Wolf359 wrote:I'll make this thread the official thread linked to Common Suggestions.
Huxley - but you're right, normally I would LOCK it!!!
please do lock it wolf, no one seems able to give me a straight answer anyway
Well, my aim is to have a link for all of the common suggestions in teh common suggestion s thread - so unless a better one is proposed, this is it! 
i bow to your wisdom mate
Posted: Fri Apr 14, 2006 5:47 am
by amadkiwi
KnightValor wrote:Sounds like a good idea.
Besides, you don't get dealt no damage!!
You get dealt 3 damage!
Your weapons still take damage though. Its your soldiers that get 3 damage. I dont like it when I attack someone for 50 mill, and I have to pay 30 mill to repair my weapons.
Posted: Fri Apr 14, 2006 11:21 pm
by C Carter
KnightValor wrote:Sounds like a good idea.
Besides, you don't get dealt no damage!!
You get dealt 3 damage!
but he said they have zero defense and u DO get dealt damage u should get dealt zero
Posted: Fri Apr 14, 2006 11:38 pm
by Wolf359
Colonel Carter wrote:KnightValor wrote:Sounds like a good idea.
Besides, you don't get dealt no damage!!
You get dealt 3 damage!
but he said they have zero defense and u DO get dealt damage u should get dealt zero
But as stated - you don't get everything for nothing - your weapons require maintenance and fuelling. Your troops and weapons require transportation - all of these would cost - so think of the damage/costs incurred as these.
Additionally - it reduces the temptation for somebody to go away for a few days, reduce their defence to zero and have their friends farm them for free - since their friends will still receive damage.
im all for it i think it should be.
Posted: Tue Feb 13, 2007 9:40 am
by assyrian worrier
im all for it i think it should be.
im all for it i think it should be.
Posted: Tue Feb 13, 2007 9:43 am
by assyrian worrier
im trying to my stuipied computer is laging and the reason its the same on all the forums i cant think of another way to describe my feelings towards them.
Re: im all for it i think it should be.
Posted: Tue Feb 13, 2007 9:45 am
by Munchy
assyrian worrier wrote:im all for it i think it should be.
Your last 7 posts have been the same thing, stop spamming...
Posted: Tue Feb 13, 2007 10:41 am
by Tivadar
i don´t know why, but there are some forum users who just bump VERY old threads .. why are they doing this? don´t they have an RL?
Posted: Tue Feb 13, 2007 4:02 pm
by Angel of Vengence
Bullets, cost money, or laser beams bombs etc in this case.
Posted: Wed Feb 14, 2007 5:14 am
by Bazsy
Okay now...
Bumping old threads: if they are still legit, not implemented or you think the same just didnf found the topic before is OK.
Bumping outdated topics is not OK
This bumping was OK, since this suggestion is still legit.
On the other hand:
-Assyrian worrier: try not to double post. You always can edit your last post, do this.
Angel of Vengence: you continuosly posting 1 sentence replies, which is not cool... If you reply try to put in all your thoughts on the issue, and think a bit before... what you doing actualy is finding some point in others posts and summarizeing them then post in 1 sentence. Please stop that practice.
Re: zero def and damage sustained
Posted: Sun Jun 10, 2007 3:17 am
by HippyFool
umm you should take SOME damage when attacking 0 defense...maybe you should only take 20% of normal damage or something though?
Re: zero def and damage sustained
Posted: Sun Jun 10, 2007 5:33 am
by RealGateHead
I take issue with it being a cost for attacking, like fuel and the like. We pay for it by using 15 ATs, that is the fuel and stuff. I think that recieving damage for a 0 def is wrong if we are trying be realistic in this game.
The turns we use act as the fuel and expenses. Damage is not a cost, it is a price you pay due to weakness and when there is nothing shooting back, you shouldnt have a weakness.
Re: zero def and damage sustained
Posted: Mon Aug 20, 2007 12:42 pm
by wmd9999
when someone attacks you with not enough power to do any damage this should also be true to your MS. this would prevent multi's from building huge MS and attacking the strong players knowing they will lose but the MS will damage the other's MS. needs to be fixed if you damage none of there weapons MS need to be undamaged as well.