then no 1 would bother with war what so everI Replicate wrote:About making it so war gives you 100%...
Actually, I would suggest you get no money in war, at all, but increase the opponents casualty rates drastically. That would be more realistic, as you are trying to destroy the opponent in war, not rob him.
So its fine as is in my opinion
Rights for FARMERS!!!
-
~Phoenix~
- Forum Addict
- Posts: 2710
- Joined: Sat Apr 02, 2005 3:29 am
- Alliance: Unaligned
- Race: Immortal
-
Saturnine
- Forum Regular
- Posts: 592
- Joined: Wed Mar 09, 2005 6:12 pm
- Race: Goauld
- ID: 9570
- Location: Stamping on a human face... Forever
- Contact:
I Replicate wrote:About making it so war gives you 100%...
Actually, I would suggest you get no money in war, at all, but increase the opponents casualty rates drastically. That would be more realistic, as you are trying to destroy the opponent in war, not rob him.
So its fine as is in my opinion
I would agree with this!! Just as long as we could still hit rich players and steal just as much as we would with war, without declaring war! THat would be good!
-
xcrunnermr06
- Forum Grunt
- Posts: 97
- Joined: Mon Mar 21, 2005 9:11 am
lord saturnine wrote:I Replicate wrote:About making it so war gives you 100%...
Actually, I would suggest you get no money in war, at all, but increase the opponents casualty rates drastically. That would be more realistic, as you are trying to destroy the opponent in war, not rob him.
So its fine as is in my opinion
I would agree with this!! Just as long as we could still hit rich players and steal just as much as we would with war, without declaring war! THat would be good!
Agree