Page 2 of 2
Posted: Wed May 17, 2006 8:50 am
by ~Coyle~
Wolf359 wrote:gooseman - beacuse you can ascend if you have already ascended - disallowing those who have already ascended to ascend again would be stupid - becaus eall those who have already ascended 6 times would dominate.
lord coyle - because Emperor Martin's way is fundamentally flawed and would actually make it HARDER for non ascended accounts to ascend for the first time. (As stated previously)
its alreay way 2 easy for non ascended accounts to get g and r..want a challenge!
Posted: Wed May 17, 2006 8:59 am
by Wolf359
Lord Coyle wrote:Wolf359 wrote:gooseman - beacuse you can ascend if you have already ascended - disallowing those who have already ascended to ascend again would be stupid - becaus eall those who have already ascended 6 times would dominate.
lord coyle - because Emperor Martin's way is fundamentally flawed and would actually make it HARDER for non ascended accounts to ascend for the first time. (As stated previously)
its alreay way 2 easy for non ascended accounts to get g and r..want a challenge!
AARGGGHHH!! But it is easier for already ascended accounts - that is the point!!!
I am generally very patient - but are you actually bothering to read!!!???
The idea would make it harder for non-ascended accounts because it is easier for ascended accounts to get back into G&R range - therefore limiting the the proportion of ranks for gaining G&R points further, means that you do not really affect ascended accounts - but make it harder for non-ascended accounts.
There is absolutely nothing wrong with the system as it stands. It ain't broke, why fix it??
Posted: Wed May 17, 2006 9:03 am
by Wolf359
gooseman the first wrote:Wolf359 wrote:gooseman - beacuse you can ascend if you have already ascended - disallowing those who have already ascended to ascend again would be stupid - becaus eall those who have already ascended 6 times would dominate.
no what i meant was disallow those who have already ascended 6 times not the whole lot
I see - but the fact is that 7+ ascensions still give you bonuses to your account - 1% on all stats for each ascension from the 7th onwards.
If we were to impement your idea, it would mean that we would have to remove the bonuses from all ascension/main accounts that have been achieved for 7+ ascensions (if there are any).
But I agree in principle.
Posted: Wed May 17, 2006 10:49 am
by Radium
Wolf359 wrote:
If we were to impement your idea, it would mean that we would have to remove the bonuses from all ascension/main accounts that have been achieved for 7+ ascensions (if there are any).
But I agree in principle.
There are some who have done this already.
Posted: Fri May 19, 2006 7:15 am
by ~Coyle~
Wolf359 wrote:Lord Coyle wrote:Wolf359 wrote:gooseman - beacuse you can ascend if you have already ascended - disallowing those who have already ascended to ascend again would be stupid - becaus eall those who have already ascended 6 times would dominate.
lord coyle - because Emperor Martin's way is fundamentally flawed and would actually make it HARDER for non ascended accounts to ascend for the first time. (As stated previously)
its alreay way 2 easy for non ascended accounts to get g and r..want a challenge!
AARGGGHHH!! But it is easier for already ascended accounts - that is the point!!!
I am generally very patient - but are you actually bothering to read!!!???
The idea would make it harder for non-ascended accounts because it is easier for ascended accounts to get back into G&R range - therefore limiting the the proportion of ranks for gaining G&R points further, means that you do not really affect ascended accounts - but make it harder for non-ascended accounts.
There is absolutely nothing wrong with the system as it stands. It ain't broke, why fix it??
kk..didnt read it rite
lol
Posted: Fri May 19, 2006 10:37 am
by An_Hur
think that maybe and I say maybe there could be differnet ranking, I mean.
1- Unascended account
2- Ascended account
3- re-ascended acount
...
Getting to the top 2% would be much more difficult... The challenge would be greater...
At this time , getting to the top 2% mean that what 1000 people get Glory point. If we split the ranking
1- 20000 unascended account would mean only the 400 first would get Glory
2- 15000 ascended once account only the top 2% ( 300)
3- 5000 ascend twice mean top 100
and so on the number are speculative but you get the idea... it would be a little harder for the unascended one but a lot more hard for those who already have ascended... And it wouldn't alter to much the struggle for power of the univers ...
Maybe having the unused account ( account with more than a month of inactivity) put on vacation mode so there would be no more farming of this account... No more farming on those account would get acquiring ressource for cheap a little more difficult. On the other hand, people like myself would get attacked more often...
on second thought forget the vacation mode -lol