Page 2 of 2
Posted: Sun Dec 24, 2006 9:19 pm
by ganstaguo
lol...
Posted: Sun Dec 24, 2006 11:50 pm
by Timmy
he stated elsewere that is raw up is 100k so yes atleast 8trillion spent on up
Posted: Wed Dec 27, 2006 11:36 am
by [SGC_ReplicÅtors]
i aint stopping either 200k raw in 6 months that is my news years resolution
so which one is better
i never like the part of buying weps for it all the time for a MS...but it cant be stolen
i like strike planets becuase they dont break ever unless some1 steals them
they cant be sold or anything arghhh they are both expensive as hell
Posted: Wed Dec 27, 2006 10:21 pm
by *~Starry~*
I still prefer the ms...
The ms can't be stolen no matter what...
and even if somebody masses...it's only a light loss because the capacity will still be there!
~starry
Posted: Fri Dec 29, 2006 12:23 pm
by [SGC_ReplicÅtors]
ive decided planet strike it is
Posted: Fri Dec 29, 2006 2:47 pm
by J.S.
As your friend I reccommend this
A MS with a 50 billion Offence and Defence and then fleets for the same.. Then go after your really good 20 to higher heavily defended strike planets..
I would rather work on my MS then my planets...
Posted: Fri Dec 29, 2006 3:20 pm
by RepliMagni
Planets can get massed away and abandoned in minutes....seconds if you're good.
Although your ms weps can get massed....the slots can't - and they're the expensive part. Therefore, leaving a quick and easy rebuild.
Moreover, you can use your ms on attack and defence...and can even hide it for 24 hrs.
Use planets to give your attack a wee boost....but the ms is the sensible investment everytime.
Posted: Sat Dec 30, 2006 12:49 pm
by [SGC_ReplicÅtors]
aarghhh i did the math they relatively cost the same bloody amount of naq
Posted: Tue Jan 02, 2007 10:35 am
by X Factor
id do my ms.
Posted: Wed Jan 10, 2007 9:49 am
by Norbe
ms for me, unless its a planet with extremely high bonuses - in which case it might be worth it if you can defend it.