StarGateWars Forums

wizard wrote:

then there was that thread about how you were getting a friend to log in.....

Last time I checked it was you giving your log in details so someone could bank for you...

well maybe u shud check again shudnt u FFS...

i mailed admin they said was not allowed so ilogged on 4 times over xmas to bank.. .case closed..

when did this "event" happen? you've said you have seen alot of similarities between barbarian and suckit. But they can only remain similarities untill you get real evidence, which is only possible through admin it seems.

from what ive gathered...this happened ages ago, would admin have records from that long ago? how long back can admin look?

ive traded with barbarian, and i find him honest and good to his word.
if your in the right barbarian. just sit back and laugh at it.

Personally i cant decide who is feeding everyone the BS and who the ice cream.

*sits and waits for topic to develope*

~BARBARIAN~ wrote:

wizard wrote:

then there was that thread about how you were getting a friend to log in.....

Last time I checked it was you giving your log in details so someone could bank for you...

well maybe u shud check again shudnt u FFS...

i mailed admin they said was not allowed so ilogged on 4 times over xmas to bank.. .case closed..

The only reason you did that was because you posted it on the forum thinking it wasnt cheating and were told that it was...so you were inclined to do that. Plus how do we know you actualy didnt give away your details. But im not accusing you of anything im just speculating. Although the fact remains you really dont have the cleanest of records my friend.

Bazsy wrote:Unomosh:

One thing i cant understand... How could u pay 700k for an account to the account u wanted to buy?:) So what u was thinking? u pay the 700k and get it back together with the account? Since noone can have 2 accounts so that 700k couldnt move anywhere further?

Or was it cross server or something?

Well, i thought perhaps he would have given it to a friend or sold it for $$$.

Anyways, the msn address is the same, the quote in the sig is the same. I know its SUCKIT. How can it not be? To suckit; just because you sent me a sweet PM does not mean i will believe you. How one earth can two people have the same msn address? Even the .co.uk part is the same. Clearly your pretending just to save your skin. I guess i was naive to think that you would admit to your wrong doing. I wouldnt randomly post after seeing that you had the same msn address. I have been watching carefully for a week and concluded that there wasnt a chance in the world that you arent SUCKIT. Pretend if you want, its not my problem anymore. I just want everyone to see that you arent an honourable player like you pretend to be.

To Tom Twin; this happended at the end of at the end of september last year. And yes admin probably will have records although im not too sure.

For the last time ill create a list of the evidence:
-Same MSN address
-Same quote in sig
-Seems to have an interest in chaos just like SUCKIT
-Talks the same way and has the same personality
-SUCKIT's last post was on the 28th of September. The ~BARBARIAN~ forum account was created on the 28th of September. (btw, if you just happen to post with your SUCKIT forum account today or in the near future in an attempt to cover up the evidence you will make it all too obvious so dont even bother)

There is the fact of you having the same msn address and COUNTLESS other coincidences. The last piece of evidence is there for everyone to see with their own eyes. Just follow the links ive given in the first post.

All i have to say is; theres no point in arguing further. I have presented the evidence. BARBARIAN has pleaded innocent. Let there be an investigation. If i turn out to be wrong i will apologise for damaging your reputation. If you turn out to be a scammer or a multi you will be dealt with.

Now all i have to ask is this; is there going to be an investigation in the near future?

Same MSN address
-Same quote in sig
-Seems to have an interest in chaos just like SUCKIT
-Talks the same way and has the same personality

same msn addy, whos got the prrof on this just cause your saying so lmao...

quote on sig i wouldnt know mate sorry...

seems to have an interest in chaos, what like the other 10k pp lthat play it

talks the same way, man now your a pyhcological examiner of posting on threads... lol

do me a favour ffs..

Well the excuses when looked at one by one dont mean anything.

But there are a few of them and they do make sense.

One: Unomosh doesn't have enough 'hard evidence' to proof his accusions
Two: However, the accusions make sense enough to raise some questions about it

~BARBARIAN~ wrote:Same MSN address
-Same quote in sig
-Seems to have an interest in chaos just like SUCKIT
-Talks the same way and has the same personality

same msn addy, whos got the prrof on this just cause your saying so lmao...

quote on sig i wouldnt know mate sorry...

seems to have an interest in chaos, what like the other 10k pp lthat play it

talks the same way, man now your a pyhcological examiner of posting on threads... lol

do me a favour ffs..

I cant prove the msn address but atleast i know it to be true myself. So if you get investigated and account histories are checked i know your screwed.

Perhaps someone else will remember that the quote was in SUCKIT's sig. The reason i remembered was because i liked it. Anyways, i said that that it was a coincidence not a fact.

Its not a pyhcological examination. I kept some of the PM's you sent me and the language used is very similar. Think before you try to be a smart alac.

You also wanting a chaos account is just another similarity to SUCKIT.

And im assuming you forgot to mention that it just happens to be a coincidence that your forum account was created the same day SUCKIT stopped posting. lmao.

If it was just one coincidence and the same msn address then i wouldnt have even bothered posting but there are so many coincidences and i know you have the same msn address...obviously im going to ask for an investigation.

Hells_Angel; im not too sure what you are reffering to by excuses? Is it my evidence or Barbarian trying to prove them wrong? Just wanting to clarify.

~BARBARIAN~ wrote:I am not suckit for christ sakes lol...

robindahood, as u can see in my post i am not suckit, you are referring to another person entirely... so calling me the scammer is uncalled for

Barbarian, I can be accused of many things but being a liar is not one of them. You are SUCKIT and at my request, the person you scammed out of 500K UU sent me the following screen shots that he took.


He purchased 3 million UU from you. Here is the Paypal screen shot showing the transaction being completed. Note the Paypal email address name.





You only brokered 2.5 million of the 3 million he purchased and that broker came from the ~BARBARIAN~ account, not SUCKIT. He sent you several messages asking when you'd send the other 500K. You replied on the same day that you had to leave and would get back to him soon. Several days later, the last message from you came in.





You never responded to any further messages and ignored all further communication from him. I told him he should have reported you as a cheater and scammer immediately but he didn't for some reason. I know I would have.

As I said, I may be many things but a liar is not one of them. Clearly you can't say the same about yourself, Chris.

Also the way the subject of the message is "d". I have a PM in my message box from SUCKIT with that title. I can take a print screen of it but i dont know how i would display it here lol. Can someone please tell me?

Thanks for posting again robin. I owe you one

The date in the paypal print screen is once again the 28th of September. Although not related it is strange that they are the same.

Perhaps barbarian felt like playing the role of a scammer that day?

hmm....these excuses sound far fectched, but in a way do make sense and some of this is starting to piece together. However there isn't enough solid proof yet to make this claim of a scammer true. I do think there needs to be more investigation. If the admin can trace this or cork can say he massed Barbarian that day, or other stuff, it would help.

hmm....these excuses sound far fectched, but in a way do make sense and some of this is starting to piece together. However there isn't enough solid proof yet to make this claim of a scammer true. I do think there needs to be more investigation. If the admin can trace this or cork can say he massed Barbarian that day, or other stuff, it would help.

Of Course " corkscrew " would say " he did mass ~B~/SUCKIT " they are in CoP, they stick up for eachother

and then the spam starts....

anyways, the only thing I can add (and it isn't much) is that you're right uno - him and SUCKIT sound exactly the same... but I'm hesitant to accuse an ally.

wizard wrote:

hmm....these excuses sound far fectched, but in a way do make sense and some of this is starting to piece together. However there isn't enough solid proof yet to make this claim of a scammer true. I do think there needs to be more investigation. If the admin can trace this or cork can say he massed Barbarian that day, or other stuff, it would help.

Of Course " corkscrew " would say " he did mass ~B~/SUCKIT " they are in CoP, they stick up for eachother

robbindahood has no reason whatsoever to expect any help whatsoever from CoP. if anything, he would expect everything to go in the opposite direction.

i think the only real way robinindahood can prove barbarian is suckit is if he can show the trade broker in a screenshot too, that would prove the uu came from the barbarian account and solidify the evidence.

having said that the coincedences are many but not farfetched. anyone would be suspicious if this many things popped in together.


barbarian: i think you should refrain from posting too much as I understand your very angry about the accusations. the best thing to do is to get unomosch, yourself, SUCKIT and a witness from either side into an MSN conversation which is easier said than done if SUCKIT has retired the MSN.


please refrain from spamming this thread as its a very serious topic.


****edited

robin one other thing the message cant be proved or disproved unless you let someone remote to your machine and watch you go through your or the persons inbox to see it for themselves.