StarGateWars Forums

Taxonomist3 wrote:

Alabrax wrote:I keep seeing people talk about how cowardly and weak CIA is.

Point and case, you have to resort to plagiarism.

Sue me.

Actually I wanted there to be parity between what COP was asking and what CIA asked. You should be flattered. I do not believe that any alleged plagiarism has ever been linked to weakness or cowardice.

generaloneill wrote:and tokra isnt a dodgy character?

tokra is many things, but a cheater, he is not.

Taxonomist3 wrote:

generaloneill wrote:and tokra isnt a dodgy character?

tokra is many things, but a cheater, he is not.

All Dodgy = All Cheaters- Statement is false.
If all Cheaters are dodgy, but not all dodgy people are cheaters.
Which statement is true?
1. Taxonomist didnt make a point.
2. Generaloneil's still stands.
3. Mattwell has taken too many online IQ tests.
4. All of the above.

I didn't know Tok'ra hacked, scammed, or cheated...

Please enlighten me Mattwell

Well he does threaten to sit on people until they delete... which I know a good number of people in CoP find distasteful. Is that considered dodgy? Well its ETL's term... I would ask him.

[DDE] Bastion wrote:I didn't know Tok'ra hacked, scammed, or cheated...

Please enlighten me Mattwell

Hacking, scamming, cheating are SOME types of Dodgy.
If you had actually read my post and NOT assumed CoP SOP and deny deny deny my post, you would have seen that I was saying Dodgy includes more than just cheaters. I'd say being an adamant enemy of CoP 3 months ago, and NOW a staunch supporter fits the unreliable definition, As well as being REPEATEDLY banned from THIS forum and then having people post for him, is evasive and shifty of the rules.

dodg·y (dŏj'ē) Pronunciation Key
adj. dodg·i·er, dodg·i·est Chiefly British

Evasive; shifty.
Unsound, unstable, and unreliable.
So risky as to require very deft handling.

Alabrax wrote:Thank you.

I was with you up until #6, which at that point you (maybe jokingly) made an arrogant remark, calling this your forum. I honestly thought I was going to get a serious reply up until I read that last one...

Thank you again.

From ETL that's about as straight forward as he gets, he's got this hmm weird sense of humour, so as long as you don't mind him every once and a while pulling something like that your going to be fine.

Disband...

Dont know the point in this thread really. People disliked COP's warring stuff so what do they do, they declare mass war, thats smart!

CIA need to stop being so concerned and stand up for themselves individually, not only when they outnumber COP by like 7 to 1.

Mattwell wrote:

[DDE] Bastion wrote:I didn't know Tok'ra hacked, scammed, or cheated...

Please enlighten me Mattwell

Hacking, scamming, cheating are SOME types of Dodgy.
If you had actually read my post and NOT assumed CoP SOP and deny deny deny my post, you would have seen that I was saying Dodgy includes more than just cheaters. I'd say being an adamant enemy of CoP 3 months ago, and NOW a staunch supporter fits the unreliable definition, As well as being REPEATEDLY banned from THIS forum and then having people post for him, is evasive and shifty of the rules.

dodg·y (dŏj'ē) Pronunciation Key
adj. dodg·i·er, dodg·i·est Chiefly British

Evasive; shifty.
Unsound, unstable, and unreliable.
So risky as to require very deft handling.

WHAT?!

I r too smart!!

In all seriousness though, who bloody cares what anyone wants changed about CIA or COP those that can make a difference to the policy are in the "super alliances" so screw it we will do our thing till destruction or victory come, no matter which...the fun is in the finding out!

Dundee wrote:

Mattwell wrote:

[DDE] Bastion wrote:I didn't know Tok'ra hacked, scammed, or cheated...

Please enlighten me Mattwell

Hacking, scamming, cheating are SOME types of Dodgy.
If you had actually read my post and NOT assumed CoP SOP and deny deny deny my post, you would have seen that I was saying Dodgy includes more than just cheaters. I'd say being an adamant enemy of CoP 3 months ago, and NOW a staunch supporter fits the unreliable definition, As well as being REPEATEDLY banned from THIS forum and then having people post for him, is evasive and shifty of the rules.

dodg·y (dŏj'ē) Pronunciation Key
adj. dodg·i·er, dodg·i·est Chiefly British

Evasive; shifty.
Unsound, unstable, and unreliable.
So risky as to require very deft handling.

WHAT?!

I r too smart!!

In all seriousness though, who bloody cares what anyone wants changed about CIA or COP those that can make a difference to the policy are in the "super alliances" so screw it we will do our thing till destruction or victory come, no matter which...the fun is in the finding out!

Is it technically possible to "find out"?

Just think about it...

Oh now come on confusing me is just not fair

Its not a trick question! The ability to war in SGW is hindered by the fact of the very limited amount of damage you can do to someone...

This is NOT a request to make it that you can raid miners/lifers, or kill covert lvls AT ALL! That would NOT BE GOOD

But as it is, once someone has nothing in stats, there's really nothing you can do to him, and everything he can do to you... (until you also lose your stats)

my predictions:

We will be at stalemate for a while

Some CIA alliances will either surrender or disband

Eventually CIA will be nothing more than an annoyance to CoP

ORRRR

CIA will stand fast and we will be at stalemate forever.....

Either case, fun fun fun!

Yeah I like that word dodgy...lmao....

Sorry for the spamm I ll try to be on topic...
Thanks Rhett I ll follow your advice...except for disbandment...my alliance will decide on that one...

I ll now go and listen to that lovely song...DREAM ON....