Page 2 of 7
Posted: Wed Apr 04, 2007 11:40 pm
by webb123
heres a word of warning.
If you are using limewire and or any networking program to attain the album, The music you are listening to is not the real music.
It has just had its filename changed.
There are only 10 copies out in the public, The ten people who have them are apart of the Linkin park street team.
Believe me, You wont get a copy until a few days before its released!
Posted: Wed Apr 04, 2007 11:44 pm
by Quina Quen
Do tell where you are getting this information from?
Posted: Wed Apr 04, 2007 11:45 pm
by webb123
I think you can figure it out
Posted: Thu Apr 05, 2007 12:57 am
by Quina Quen
Don't feel insulted when I say I think you're talking out of your proverbial backside. Simple question to answer really.

Posted: Thu Apr 05, 2007 2:58 am
by Monty.
i liked the stuff the did with Jay-Z, buit only the pones where it was the linkin park music in the background
Posted: Thu Apr 05, 2007 3:02 am
by Quina Quen
Agree Monty, the 'live' stuff from Jay-Z on the B-side was dire. Utter nonsense.
Posted: Thu Apr 05, 2007 3:07 am
by Monty.
yeah, crossing izzo with in the end and papercut with big pimpin was blasphemy, however 99problems/points of authority/one step closer , numb/encore and dirt off your shoulder/lying from you were very good
i would really like to see linkin park do an album with rage against the machine, the 2 have a similar style sometimes (nu metal) and i think would go really well together
Posted: Thu Apr 05, 2007 10:00 am
by webb123
**Filtered** sake JAY -Z RUINED linkin park.
And to be fair, If you really think i'm talking aload of bull, well up yours!!!!!
Posted: Thu Apr 05, 2007 10:40 am
by Stubert
jay z needed good back up music. all his is pure **Filtered**. he did some good songs with them like numb/encore and 99 steps closer.
Posted: Thu Apr 05, 2007 11:06 am
by Quina Quen
neil33 wrote:And to be fair, If you really think i'm talking aload of bull, well up yours!!!!!
Heh, I just wanted you to answer my question. And if I'm sincere, I really really want to beleive you too. I can't stand this nonsense they are calling new material.
Posted: Thu Apr 05, 2007 11:12 am
by Spacey
friendly general reminder to all...
Spacey wrote:
- Please be respectful of other music preferences. Music, like people, is varied and slagging/flaming/excessively discrediting the music is hurtful to those who enjoy the music.
Posted: Thu Apr 05, 2007 4:27 pm
by Quina Quen
I instigated the retort from Mr 33 here, so I'll take the flak, but we're cool here otherwise Spacey
Back on topic eh? Is anyone able to confirm that this nonsense that I'm listening to is NOT the actual material that is set to be released on Linkin Park's forthcoming album 'Minutes To Midnight'.
And just to instil some stimulus to this topic, is anyone familiar with the LP titled 'Reanimation'? It's all sorts of awesome, and how many years old now? I still play it

Posted: Sun Apr 08, 2007 10:09 pm
by quickshot84
ive had the album for a few months now, and i have to say i like the new approach that they're taken on 'MtM'
more of a metal approach than their last few albums, but hell, they've managed to pull it off.
probably one of my new faves off the album is 'Real Life'
Posted: Mon Apr 09, 2007 8:52 am
by Quina Quen
It's not real.
Posted: Mon Apr 09, 2007 11:01 am
by Arcturus
The only song that is real that can be confirmed is the one they have on their website, "What I've Done." The rest no one can really be sure.