Further Developed Alliance Settings

[dead solid]

love it xD

[Rottenking]

would be good also if you could sort people into usergroups ( like strike teams)

and the other day i was thinking that it would be cool if you could "link" training alliences which would allow you to transfer members with ease and if one went to war the mother or child allience can see the stats... and also you could select one "supreme commander" who can manage both alliences in the aspec of declare war on both alliences and change leader ect if necicary

that was prolly suggested before but o well

[Predator]

yeh thats another good idea. this would be a great suggestion and 30 people or so are for it. theres no major oposition...so what are the chances of it being implemented?

[Lord Thanatos]

I like it, and i aso think alliance members should be able to see when people in their alliance are online. and the message problem needs to be fixed also.

[Lord Silent Bob]

Either way it's a win win situation allowing flexibility of use and ease of communication. I like it

[Tanith]

yeh thats another good idea. this would be a great suggestion and 30 people or so are for it. theres no major oposition...so what are the chances of it being implemented?

I *hope* the chances are good. And its not like its a massive update that would change the entire gameplay of SGW like some suggestions are. Its just an improvement and addition to a current system.

[Shornaal]

I think this is a good idea. *nods*

[plm2]

THE PLAYERS HAVE SPOKEN

[kvarga]

I like it too..
But: I think, we managed to do it. Our alliance has a High Council. We have a dedicated part on your forums, where we discuss the H.C. things.. When we work something out, the Leader announces it. It is good, because we are a smaller alliance, and one people can handle (can she? ) the incoming and outgoing messages. Better, if everything goes through one person (or 2), than the whole H.C. sends messages.
Still i think this option is a good idea. Every alliance can choose it's leaders. Or it can choose how many leaders does it need/allow. This freedom exsisted, but with this update it can be official.

[yamosas1]

seems a good idea but i reckon the ranks should be the same for all alliances so when the officer speaks ppl know how far up the chain he is otherwise it will get confusing.
example : supreme commander,general,colonel,captain,leutenant ect

then maybe some admin type ranks
president,vice president,diplomatic adviser

[nightlight]

Please admin bring this option in it would make my job alot easy to do
(2 years on the forum and my 50th post)

[Asclepius]

Support it all the way

[Predator]

bump

come on this is a great idea implenent it now

[*~Starry~*]

I like this one ^^


~starry~*

[Kroony]

I LOVE IT,