Page 2 of 6
Posted: Tue Mar 20, 2007 2:39 am
by dead solid
love it xD
Posted: Tue Mar 20, 2007 3:03 am
by Rottenking
would be good also if you could sort people into usergroups ( like strike teams)
and the other day i was thinking that it would be cool if you could "link" training alliences which would allow you to transfer members with ease and if one went to war the mother or child allience can see the stats... and also you could select one "supreme commander" who can manage both alliences in the aspec of declare war on both alliences and change leader ect if necicary
that was prolly suggested before but o well
Posted: Thu Mar 22, 2007 11:37 am
by Predator
yeh thats another good idea. this would be a great suggestion and 30 people or so are for it. theres no major oposition...so what are the chances of it being implemented?
Posted: Thu Mar 22, 2007 11:44 am
by Lord Thanatos
I like it, and i aso think alliance members should be able to see when people in their alliance are online. and the message problem needs to be fixed also.
Posted: Thu Mar 22, 2007 6:59 pm
by Lord Silent Bob
Either way it's a win win situation allowing flexibility of use and ease of communication. I like it
Posted: Sat Mar 24, 2007 6:14 pm
by Tanith
Predator wrote:yeh thats another good idea. this would be a great suggestion and 30 people or so are for it. theres no major oposition...so what are the chances of it being implemented?
I *hope* the chances are good. And its not like its a massive update that would change the entire gameplay of SGW like some suggestions are. Its just an improvement and addition to a current system.
Posted: Sat Mar 24, 2007 6:23 pm
by Shornaal
I think this is a good idea. *nods*
Posted: Sat Mar 24, 2007 7:26 pm
by plm2
THE PLAYERS HAVE SPOKEN
Posted: Sun Mar 25, 2007 11:25 am
by kvarga
I like it too..
But: I think, we managed to do it. Our alliance has a High Council. We have a dedicated part on your forums, where we discuss the H.C. things.. When we work something out, the Leader announces it. It is good, because we are a smaller alliance, and one people can handle (can she?
) the incoming and outgoing messages. Better, if everything goes through one person (or 2), than the whole H.C. sends messages.
Still i think this option is a good idea. Every alliance can choose it's leaders. Or it can choose how many leaders does it need/allow. This freedom exsisted, but with this update it can be official.
Posted: Sun Mar 25, 2007 2:59 pm
by yamosas1
seems a good idea but i reckon the ranks should be the same for all alliances so when the officer speaks ppl know how far up the chain he is otherwise it will get confusing.
example : supreme commander,general,colonel,captain,leutenant ect
then maybe some admin type ranks
president,vice president,diplomatic adviser
Posted: Mon Mar 26, 2007 3:00 am
by nightlight
Please admin bring this option in it would make my job alot easy to do
(2 years on the forum and my 50th post)
Posted: Mon Mar 26, 2007 4:40 am
by Asclepius
Support it all the way
Posted: Mon Mar 26, 2007 8:37 am
by Predator
bump
come on this is a great idea implenent it now
Posted: Mon Mar 26, 2007 8:21 pm
by *~Starry~*
I like this one ^^
~starry~*
Posted: Mon Mar 26, 2007 10:43 pm
by Kroony
I LOVE IT,