StarGateWars Forums

Tokra you say you will mass your allies if need be, isnt ETL like the 'God' of System Lords. So why dont you go deal with him first, then if you beat him I will delete my account and become a Tokra scum.

BW

Bad Wolf wrote:Tokra you say you will mass your allies if need be, isnt ETL like the 'God' of System Lords. So why dont you go deal with him first, then if you beat him I will delete my account and become a Tokra scum.

BW

hi new Tokra scum

Bad Wolf wrote:Tokra you say you will mass your allies if need be, isnt ETL like the 'God' of System Lords. So why dont you go deal with him first, then if you beat him I will delete my account and become a Tokra scum.

BW

ETL, REK are what every tokra dislikes (hmmm meant fear ), because they are sort of SG-1's Anubis, they are very dangerous and act like System Lords.
So yes I wonder if it will happen!

Bad Wolf wrote:Tokra you say you will mass your allies if need be, isnt ETL like the 'God' of System Lords. So why dont you go deal with him first, then if you beat him I will delete my account and become a Tokra scum.

BW

Were did I say Ill mass allies ?

Will I call them out on the fourm ?

Yeah, but thats not massing.

Bad 'ill informed' Wolf; indeed.

Tok`ra wrote:

Bad Wolf wrote:Tokra you say you will mass your allies if need be, isnt ETL like the 'God' of System Lords. So why dont you go deal with him first, then if you beat him I will delete my account and become a Tokra scum.

BW

Were did I say Ill mass allies ?

Will I call them out on the fourm ?

Yeah, but thats not massing.

Bad 'ill informed' Wolf; indeed.

'Stupid' Tokra indeed.

BW

Me and buckner (shol'va) And lord zeus ended the tokra a long long while back, the game logistics have changed alot since then, the tokra movement as it is cannot work in the games environment, though i still keep my finger in alot of pies where information is concerned

As Buck said. Ingame it is tough for a Tokra to do as much as a time ago.
Spying ,and causing distrust among alliances is the best that can be done. Of course that is most effectie ,and what teh tokra did anyway.
Ah well.

Lord_Grant wrote:As Buck said. Ingame it is tough for a Tokra to do as much as a time ago.
Spying ,and causing distrust among alliances is the best that can be done. Of course that is most effectie ,and what teh tokra did anyway.
Ah well.

The last few original Tokra from the tokra movement still watch....all....

Teal'auc of the Tok'ra wrote:Well, the Tok'ra are still around... I have been one of them since I came to the SGW universe



Teal'auc

But you were in a Goa'uldy alliance for a while (AK).
Why Goa'uldy? Bahamut, enough said

buck wrote:Me and buckner (shol'va) And lord zeus ended the tokra a long long while back, the game logistics have changed alot since then, the tokra movement as it is cannot work in the games environment, though i still keep my finger in alot of pies where information is concerned

Thats why Im concentrating on the fourm mostly now.

The new Tok`ra shall be the posters that always point out these annoying 'facts' and 'turths' weather our targets be freind or foe.

Apophis The Great wrote:But you were in a Goa'uldy alliance for a while (AK).
Why Goa'uldy? Bahamut, enough said

Well, AK was far away from goa'uld alliance, as when I was member there, there were not only goa'uld players. So, cut it off, dear.

To the topic - the tok'ra movement - As the member of the Tok'ra, I would support it, but if your intention is to question mods on this forum, Wes, no chance of me supporting you. And, in fact, if you do intend to throw a crap on people, who mostly try to HELP, I am ashamed to see you as member of the Tok'ra movement.



Teal'auc

Teal'auc of the Tok'ra wrote:

Apophis The Great wrote:But you were in a Goa'uldy alliance for a while (AK).
Why Goa'uldy? Bahamut, enough said

Well, AK was far away from goa'uld alliance, as when I was member there, there were not only goa'uld players. So, cut it off, dear.

To the topic - the tok'ra movement - As the member of the Tok'ra, I would support it, but if your intention is to question mods on this forum, Wes, no chance of me supporting you. And, in fact, if you do intend to throw a crap on people, who mostly try to HELP, I am ashamed to see you as member of the Tok'ra movement.



Teal'auc

Try reading what I wrote.

Or what Ive BEEN writing.

I have no beef with the mods.

But on occasion certain mods, in my opinion, abuse their power.

In such cases I will not hesitate to call them out.

Bad Wolf wrote:Tokra you say you will mass your allies if need be, isnt ETL like the 'God' of System Lords. So why dont you go deal with him first, then if you beat him I will delete my account and become a Tokra scum.

BW

Tell me. How does one go about deleting their account, yet fight as a tok'ra within the game?

Teal'auc of the Tok'ra wrote:

Apophis The Great wrote:But you were in a Goa'uldy alliance for a while (AK).
Why Goa'uldy? Bahamut, enough said

Well, AK was far away from goa'uld alliance, as when I was member there, there were not only goa'uld players. So, cut it off, dear.

To the topic - the tok'ra movement - As the member of the Tok'ra, I would support it, but if your intention is to question mods on this forum, Wes, no chance of me supporting you. And, in fact, if you do intend to throw a crap on people, who mostly try to HELP, I am ashamed to see you as member of the Tok'ra movement.



Teal'auc

An alliance has not to be made only of Goa'ulds to be Goa'uldy, remember Bahamut and 2_many_Jack_oneills switching to [AK]Cheops and System Lord, the leadership was goauld, the spy chief (me) was Goa'uld.
Bahamut reigned as a Supreme System Lord in AK. And I remember you had some arguements with him when he said he was God of AK
Alliance may have not been, however, leadership was fully!