StarGateWars Forums

blahh wrote:TH is right, if they were active recently like in his case, they have no place in there, or better said, switching alliance tags should not protect them, else we can all go mess up evry1 join to STI after that leave that one mass some more join you, leave you mess some more ppl and go back to STI.... and the saga continues

anyoe who knows me, knows i would not allow a person to join & leave, attack only to join again. all it would take is a message/attack log & you know what i would do. also i am approchable to discuss anything, i would not think anyone would join me having just done a load of attacks, knowing how i would react.

but on a lighter note

Apr 06, 2007 High Empty recon Repelled 42,028 details

geisha, the sig is awesome

BL1P wrote:

geisha wrote:

Memento wrote:u cant be switzerland :p cos TO is switzerland

TO has gone to bed with Omega before... hahaha Switzerland pfff....

lol and before anybody thinks o look TO are working with Omega
geisha is reffering too a drunken incedent that happend at the uk convention
not ingame polotics.

see photos of uk convention for more explanations

u werent drunk but others were lol

I kinda wonder what the point of all this is. I've had no trouble staying neutral in this war all by myself. In fact, joining a third faction seems less neutral to me than what I'm doing now.

~Phoenix~ wrote:
I didn't run to any peacful alliance im still in DD and I have no plans on leaving. ID-11492 look for youreself.

I dont like the way you talk about "letting me go" though, I can do what I want. And if I personally built up my defense you personally couldn't touch it tbh.

The alliance has not formed yet, and your on PPT.

Sorry, I misinterputed a message you sent to another CIA mate.

I had assumed you would be joining this new alliance which has not formed yet. Im bad. My apologies.

It is not about if I can touch your defence on my own. We fight as a team here, my resources are spread out, and there is no guarantee I couldn't.

Well, as I said if members want to move they should formally declare themselfs out. If they hit then wish to leave then there should be compensation.

Don


edit: STI, yes I found that amusing also.

Here's the problem I see with these refugee alliances. We'll take Priller for example. He left DDE and claimed himself neutral. As soon as he built up a bankroll, he then rejoined DDE and jumped right back into the war.

While you can prevent these people from doing it again by blacklisting them, the fact is that once is all it takes. Join a refugee alliance, fill your bank and overbank in the broker, build up some massive MS and strike numbers, and then rejoin the war. The damage has then been done.

While this is obviously not the intended purpose of these refugee havens, they have been used for that in the past. Any insights on what can be done about such situations? Perhaps if there is something you can do to somehow guarantee that the members are out of the war forever, then people would be more likely to respect their newfound neutrality.

I can guarantee if anyone that joins Shooting Stars alliance tries that, then he will most definately pwn their ascension and main account, simple as that.

Shooting Star wrote:Starting as soon as I am able to come off vacation mode in main, I am forming the Rogue Warrior alliance. For all those sick and tired of the utter stupidity and pigheadedness of the two warring factions in this fiasco that no one will admit that they can't win, I am offering a safe haven. There are two requirements: 1.) you must be vetted by me and 2.) you may make no attacks on anyone unless attacked first, at least until the war is over. OK I lied, there is a third rule: you may not assist anyone involved in the war effort with covert help or monies/resources/turns. We will be Switzerland. Anyone caught violating these rules will be dismissed from the alliance and summarily chastised. Details to follow.

S T I 's alliance D U N E has already done that