Page 2 of 2

Posted: Thu May 10, 2007 5:57 pm
by Rift
DD/D12 never posted saying they surrendered jedi

Posted: Thu May 10, 2007 6:09 pm
by SÅTÅN 666
Sinister wrote:
[DD2] JediMasterX wrote:CoP never surrendered, they disbanded based on DD/D12 leaving. Now if you want to say someone surrendered, I guess you could say DD/D12, but in my view, I see no one losing or winning this past war.


Please explain why they should say we surrendered.





u left CoP like little *modded. I suggest you check your PMs before you make anymore pointless posts* - Setesh... I think that is what Jedi is geting at

:wink:

Posted: Thu May 10, 2007 6:13 pm
by Come_Forth
Did you not leave the war?
NO LONGER IN THE COP VS CIA WAR!!!!

Posted: Thu May 10, 2007 6:14 pm
by Angnoch
first of all DD/D12 didnt leave like little b****** they stuck it out to the end and even said if the ceasefire fell through they would come back and fight so they never surrendered and second if I recall AGA you "quit" the war a long time ago.

Posted: Thu May 10, 2007 6:23 pm
by Rift
Come_Forth wrote:Did you not leave the war?
NO LONGER IN THE COP VS CIA WAR!!!!


a lot faster too

Posted: Thu May 10, 2007 7:16 pm
by Nug
Big Brother wrote:it seem's to have slipped everyones notice, but with CoP disbandment Robe is no longer under any surrender terms.

so the real winner is Robe, she can now openly lead any alliance she wants of any size she wants.


Hit the nail on the head almost :wink:

Robe only had terms with the GA, when the GA ceased to exist, those terms were no more :-)

Although when Robe rejoined TF, Rek and Etl demanded she leave at once...

Anyways, wars over, so no need to debate the Sgw History :)

Posted: Thu May 10, 2007 7:38 pm
by Vendetta
From my understanding AGA was booted from OSL and effectvely forced out of the war. If youa lliance booted you, why would you re-join the war thier in?

Posted: Thu May 10, 2007 9:35 pm
by [TA] Ryan Uy
the war is over, COP no more CIA no more, i think even without a clear statement on who won, most of those in the war got what they wanted, being said or not, so lets just leave this be and look forward to future whatever that maybe for now, all parties should take a breather and contemplate on their next move

Posted: Thu May 10, 2007 9:41 pm
by Lore
Ancient God Anubis wrote:u left CoP like little **Filtered**...


If I remember correctly this is the manner in which you left mate.

You need to watch your language as well ~Lore~

Posted: Thu May 10, 2007 10:02 pm
by REK
CoP was pact of 3

there is no 3 any more

hence no CoP

Posted: Thu May 10, 2007 10:43 pm
by Bazsy
Nug wrote:
Big Brother wrote:it seem's to have slipped everyones notice, but with CoP disbandment Robe is no longer under any surrender terms.

so the real winner is Robe, she can now openly lead any alliance she wants of any size she wants.


Hit the nail on the head almost :wink:

Robe only had terms with the GA, when the GA ceased to exist, those terms were no more :-)

Although when Robe rejoined TF, Rek and Etl demanded she leave at once...

Anyways, wars over, so no need to debate the Sgw History :)


Nug, dont start it again please...
We discussed it multiple times, that it was a surrender term, after the Omega vs TF war around september. I dont know where you were at that time. And since omega is still around that could be still in order. But I think noone care with this now. So we could forget it once and for all. And that would spare us some flaming and correcting like this....

Posted: Thu May 10, 2007 10:48 pm
by jazzydog14
I love how you all are still bickering in here like little kids about a stupid game.

Time to move on boys and girls, SGW is far past over rated and far beyond its time.

You all need to wise up, and move on, to much blood sweat and tears have fallen in this game, to stay any longer. Time to go.

Posted: Thu May 10, 2007 10:58 pm
by Nug
Bazsy wrote:
Nug wrote:
Big Brother wrote:it seem's to have slipped everyones notice, but with CoP disbandment Robe is no longer under any surrender terms.

so the real winner is Robe, she can now openly lead any alliance she wants of any size she wants.


Hit the nail on the head almost :wink:

Robe only had terms with the GA, when the GA ceased to exist, those terms were no more :-)

Although when Robe rejoined TF, Rek and Etl demanded she leave at once...

Anyways, wars over, so no need to debate the Sgw History :)


Nug, dont start it again please...
We discussed it multiple times, that it was a surrender term, after the Omega vs TF war around september. I dont know where you were at that time. And since omega is still around that could be still in order. But I think noone care with this now. So we could forget it once and for all. And that would spare us some flaming and correcting like this....


Nug wrote:Anyways, wars over, so no need to debate the Sgw History :)

Posted: Thu May 10, 2007 11:33 pm
by Avitir
Bazsy wrote:
Nug wrote:
Big Brother wrote:it seem's to have slipped everyones notice, but with CoP disbandment Robe is no longer under any surrender terms.

so the real winner is Robe, she can now openly lead any alliance she wants of any size she wants.


Hit the nail on the head almost :wink:

Robe only had terms with the GA, when the GA ceased to exist, those terms were no more :-)

Although when Robe rejoined TF, Rek and Etl demanded she leave at once...

Anyways, wars over, so no need to debate the Sgw History :)


Nug, dont start it again please...
We discussed it multiple times, that it was a surrender term, after the Omega vs TF war around september. I dont know where you were at that time. And since omega is still around that could be still in order. But I think noone care with this now. So we could forget it once and for all. And that would spare us some flaming and correcting like this....


I agree, this is all old history now and anyone who uses it to cause The Foundation trouble (as the original post intended- not the ones after) is just a very sad individual indeed. Let me explain;

The only one Robe being leader of The Foundation effects are members of The Foundation. If you want a winner and loser once again the only ones this effects are two players: myself and Thufir_Hawat, nobody else. We are the two who were 'demoted' when Robe returned. Robe is also bound to The Foundation leadership team- she does not make decisions without following our due protocol so lets also get over the whole idea Robe pulls everyones strings.

Avitir
Treaty Officer, Diplomat and 3rd of The Foundation.

Posted: Thu May 10, 2007 11:38 pm
by Bazsy
Nug wrote:
Bazsy wrote:
Nug wrote:
Big Brother wrote:it seem's to have slipped everyones notice, but with CoP disbandment Robe is no longer under any surrender terms.

so the real winner is Robe, she can now openly lead any alliance she wants of any size she wants.


Hit the nail on the head almost :wink:

Robe only had terms with the GA, when the GA ceased to exist, those terms were no more :-)

Although when Robe rejoined TF, Rek and Etl demanded she leave at once...

Anyways, wars over, so no need to debate the Sgw History :)


Nug, dont start it again please...
We discussed it multiple times, that it was a surrender term, after the Omega vs TF war around september. I dont know where you were at that time. And since omega is still around that could be still in order. But I think noone care with this now. So we could forget it once and for all. And that would spare us some flaming and correcting like this....


Nug wrote:Anyways, wars over, so no need to debate the Sgw History :)


I just corrected you to avoid this to go into sgw history not as it happned;)
The fact that it losts its point, doesnt mean that we should remind this not as this was... If you get my point.

I was always happy when someone corredted my historical records, cause I want to remember everything as it happened. And it was not me who came out with this:)