Posted: Wed May 23, 2007 9:59 am
SVaRuN wrote:Yes he did...
P.S. Tell uncle STI that he should read this thread and either to burn 311 alive or himself
what???????
what???????
StarGateWars Forums
These are the forums for the GateWa.rs family of text-based space-centred PBBGs
https://talk.gatewa.rs/
biggest fleet
Page 2 of 3
what???????
Posted: Wed May 23, 2007 10:19 am
200bil would be more then safe (however that would be the biggest waste of money)
Posted: Wed May 23, 2007 10:21 am
No defence is safe.
I know someone with 30bil fleet strength, and they did not just ascend
I know someone with 30bil fleet strength, and they did not just ascend
Posted: Wed May 23, 2007 10:26 am
SVaRuN wrote:200bil would be more then safe (however that would be the biggest waste of money)
it really would be a big waste of money naq whatever, to build a defense so large ..................
maybe he has so much naq to burn it wasnt a big deal to him whatever
Re: biggest fleet
Posted: Wed May 23, 2007 4:30 pm
monkey wrote:i wna know hw much power sum ppl have
*points to "espionage" button*
I have 1500 unascended hangars.
They're empty.Posted: Wed May 23, 2007 4:55 pm
The best def might be like saying, " steal my planet and you'll rot in hell" or "Protected by _ _ _ _"
Posted: Wed May 23, 2007 5:06 pm
Well I got a 6 bil fleet in like 1 week by myself. I can probably get up to 12 bil.
As for planet defences, biggest waste. I know of only 2 planets that are semi safe because they have like 200 bil + defence on them.
As for planet defences, biggest waste. I know of only 2 planets that are semi safe because they have like 200 bil + defence on them.
Posted: Wed May 23, 2007 6:04 pm
instead of investing in planet defense, why not just fleet strength and Merlin power. with merlin it would be protected for some time, and with a good fleet u can take it back mroe easily. then u could always bring your CO / alliance into the situation if it becomes a problem
Posted: Wed May 23, 2007 6:09 pm
30k+ fleet?
now that is scary
i like to be in the dark
now that is scary
i like to be in the dark
Posted: Wed May 23, 2007 6:10 pm
The problem is when they steal the planet it loses 25%? then you steal it back and there goes another 18.75% of the original.
Start bouncing it back some more and the planet becomes useless...
Defences are still required if you wish to protect your investment.
It is a tradeoff still betweent the cost of defence + enhancement vs just placing Naq directly into that stat.
The update basically effects those in the middle the most. Mainly those ascending with minimum UP....
The "big" and most small players have UPs double or more of their planets...
I have 22k Fleet Slots and haven't really focused on them. Someone who focuses on them could take practically any planet. Even with the fleets planets are expensive to take.
Start bouncing it back some more and the planet becomes useless...
Defences are still required if you wish to protect your investment.
It is a tradeoff still betweent the cost of defence + enhancement vs just placing Naq directly into that stat.
The update basically effects those in the middle the most. Mainly those ascending with minimum UP....
The "big" and most small players have UPs double or more of their planets...
I have 22k Fleet Slots and haven't really focused on them. Someone who focuses on them could take practically any planet. Even with the fleets planets are expensive to take.
Posted: Wed May 23, 2007 9:02 pm
tst 300bil defences are the way to go at the moment, but at somepoint i'll need to double it again...
Stupid update lol
and it shouldb be fleets are good for 25% damage and not the 10% i've been seeing, plus defences should have a cap range
meaning that you can get 10% of your defences lower then, but up to a max of 5-10bil.
That way you don't have a defence of 1 trill and lose out when someone hits you with a 800bil strike, cause you only defended for 800bil. i mean come on what gives.
Stupid update lol
and it shouldb be fleets are good for 25% damage and not the 10% i've been seeing, plus defences should have a cap range
meaning that you can get 10% of your defences lower then, but up to a max of 5-10bil.
That way you don't have a defence of 1 trill and lose out when someone hits you with a 800bil strike, cause you only defended for 800bil. i mean come on what gives.
Posted: Fri May 25, 2007 4:28 pm
The safety factor is in the stat of the planet.
E.g. a 5k planet with 30 bill defence is safe as there are way bigger UP's out there with less defence.
E.g. a 5k planet with 30 bill defence is safe as there are way bigger UP's out there with less defence.
Posted: Fri May 25, 2007 6:26 pm
311 [TA] wrote:I would hazard a guess over 30k .................
If there was a 50k fleet cap I would be surprised but its not impossible
I think it is somewhere between 30k and 50k, i may be way off base........
since its hard to know everyones fleet cap this would mean we would need the person with the highest to say what his is etc....
Corkscrew had 20b Fleet power like 1month ago
Posted: Fri May 25, 2007 7:08 pm
extremer wrote:ricochet wrote:~Zekk~ wrote:I think replijake has a 30bill fleet power with 60k fleets.
I dunno though.
>.>
<.<
~Zekk~
youre right,he does thats why my planet has 240b def
repli just ascended i think
Didnt the new update to MS's let you keep 60% of your MS?
Posted: Sat May 26, 2007 12:41 pm
Isn't cheaper to upgrade the planet, rather to upgrade MS and to steal it?