Page 2 of 2

Re: Number of attack that dies

Posted: Fri Aug 10, 2007 8:44 am
by The Xeno
>_>
<_<
Some of us are army-size n00bs ;)

Re: Number of attack that dies

Posted: Fri Aug 10, 2007 2:47 pm
by Ultimatum
I just ascended so i have no army to test it out on, lucky me :-D

Re: Number of attack that dies

Posted: Sat Aug 11, 2007 10:18 am
by Munchy
It can be done on a far smaller scale you know, for test purposes...

Re: Number of attack that dies

Posted: Sun Aug 12, 2007 9:44 pm
by Ultimatum
But we need a big test, losts of men required :-D

Re: Number of attack that dies

Posted: Tue Aug 14, 2007 7:59 am
by The Xeno
It can be done on a far smaller scale you know, for test purposes...

Neg - we require a large body count for the pleasure of the audience.
Extrapolation of figures would not achieve that.

Re: Number of attack that dies

Posted: Tue Aug 21, 2007 12:06 am
by Nostradamus
In both cases you would lose the same number of supers - 42k.

It's more then 1.75% you would say ... lol .... if you do the math you will get there. Also, for those who are in the game for a long time it wouldn't be the first time that what is writen by admin isn't what's really happening ingame.

Because of repair costs and the random % of you attack it's better to go with the 1.8 mil supers solution.

Re: Number of attack that dies

Posted: Wed Aug 22, 2007 5:39 am
by Omoc
Are you sure i'd lose the same ammount of supers?

Re: Number of attack that dies

Posted: Thu Aug 23, 2007 12:45 am
by Nostradamus
100%

Re: Number of attack that dies

Posted: Thu Aug 23, 2007 1:20 am
by Omoc
Great, thanks then...