Mothership vs Ascension
-
[SGC_ReplicÅtors]
- Forum Addict
- Posts: 3949
- Joined: Sun Mar 13, 2005 4:57 pm
- ID: 0
Re: Mothership vs Ascension
wohoo now the benefits come
- Mukasa
- Forum Addict
- Posts: 3506
- Joined: Sun Apr 23, 2006 4:07 am
-
Turkey
- Forum Regular
- Posts: 649
- Joined: Sat Mar 11, 2006 3:39 am
- Location: Scotland
Re: Mothership vs Ascension
Why though? Don't you wanna know why? It's just made ascending a whole lot easier because you dont have to rebuild your MS each time. If we get to keep MS after ascending why dont we get to keep every other stat? What makes MS so special?
-
Munchy
- Forum Expert
- Posts: 1408
- Joined: Sat Apr 01, 2006 8:54 pm
- Alliance: Tauri Alliance
- ID: 60881
Re: Mothership vs Ascension
Probably because with MS's you didn't get APP for most of the cost of the ship(slots). With every other stat you get APP in some equivalence.(not all equal, but still)

ID=60881
-
Turkey
- Forum Regular
- Posts: 649
- Joined: Sat Mar 11, 2006 3:39 am
- Location: Scotland
Re: Mothership vs Ascension
Surely the amount of APP that MS's provide should have been increased instead then.
-
Manetheren
- Forum Elite
- Posts: 1513
- Joined: Wed May 04, 2005 12:31 am
- Alliance: Tauri Alliance
- Race: Ancient
- ID: 0
Re: Mothership vs Ascension
Well I think part of the goal is to motivate people to ascend again. If you spend 10-20 tril(or more) on a mothership then how likely are you to ascend again if you lose it all?
-
Turkey
- Forum Regular
- Posts: 649
- Joined: Sat Mar 11, 2006 3:39 am
- Location: Scotland
Re: Mothership vs Ascension
And why would admin want to encourage ppl to ascend again? I know he raised the cap to 20, but there is still a cap and I think he would have made the cap alot higher if he wanted ppl to ascend lots more.
-
Munchy
- Forum Expert
- Posts: 1408
- Joined: Sat Apr 01, 2006 8:54 pm
- Alliance: Tauri Alliance
- ID: 60881
Re: Mothership vs Ascension
Turkey wrote:Surely the amount of APP that MS's provide should have been increased instead then.
It was brought up on chats many times. He really didn't want to do that for whatever reason. And Manetheren has a good point aswell. Right now Forum is focusing alot on ascension, trying to get its activity level up and whatnot through updates and balance. By allowing people to keep their ships, he encourages more people to ascend who wouldn't normally, thus possibly increasing the activity level on the ascension server...

ID=60881
-
Turkey
- Forum Regular
- Posts: 649
- Joined: Sat Mar 11, 2006 3:39 am
- Location: Scotland
- Darmo
- Forum Grunt
- Posts: 59
- Joined: Wed Nov 01, 2006 12:04 pm
- ID: 68660
- Location: COOKIE FACTORY
Re: Mothership vs Ascension
This is improving ascension and the cost of main, and in the end will destroy both games
we are gonna get an extreme increase in accounts which just have a 'killer' ms. accounts where you can not destroy them as they JUST have a ms. and as you can send ur ms out all the time, we are giving permission for potentially invincible weapons.
Though all this was able to be done before, though the 100% provides an incentive, as now when u ascend, its still invincible. this also potentially removes the need for any strike (slight strike for stealing naq). Which means defence can also be written off. All u need it a ms.
I know im exaggerating, but this is the situation at the limits.
as for the idea it will get more people playing ascension, but less people will play main, so less new people will bother continuing as they just get pummelled by ultimate weapons (ms) which they cant do anything against, and so there will be no new flow into main or ascension
Please think carefully and reconsider
we are gonna get an extreme increase in accounts which just have a 'killer' ms. accounts where you can not destroy them as they JUST have a ms. and as you can send ur ms out all the time, we are giving permission for potentially invincible weapons.
Though all this was able to be done before, though the 100% provides an incentive, as now when u ascend, its still invincible. this also potentially removes the need for any strike (slight strike for stealing naq). Which means defence can also be written off. All u need it a ms.
I know im exaggerating, but this is the situation at the limits.
as for the idea it will get more people playing ascension, but less people will play main, so less new people will bother continuing as they just get pummelled by ultimate weapons (ms) which they cant do anything against, and so there will be no new flow into main or ascension
Please think carefully and reconsider
Come to the dark side, we have cookies
4/07/2008
Anderial says:
I'm a helpful parasite
Trade Feedback: http://stargatewars.herebegames.com/vie ... 8&t=151691
4/07/2008
Anderial says:
I'm a helpful parasite
Trade Feedback: http://stargatewars.herebegames.com/vie ... 8&t=151691
- Milenko
- Forum Expert
- Posts: 1336
- Joined: Sun May 06, 2007 4:04 am
- Alliance: DoC
- Race: Ancient
- ID: 1911875
- Location: Under The Southern Cross
- Contact:
Re: Mothership vs Ascension
bsm wrote:man, wish this was the case 3 weeks ago when I ascended...
Same here
Never argue with idiots. They bring you down to their level and beat you with years of experience!

Trade Feedback

Trade Feedback
-
Turkey
- Forum Regular
- Posts: 649
- Joined: Sat Mar 11, 2006 3:39 am
- Location: Scotland
Re: Mothership vs Ascension
Omrad wrote:This is improving ascension and the cost of main, and in the end will destroy both games![]()
we are gonna get an extreme increase in accounts which just have a 'killer' ms. accounts where you can not destroy them as they JUST have a ms. and as you can send ur ms out all the time, we are giving permission for potentially invincible weapons.
Though all this was able to be done before, though the 100% provides an incentive, as now when u ascend, its still invincible. this also potentially removes the need for any strike (slight strike for stealing naq). Which means defence can also be written off. All u need it a ms.
I know im exaggerating, but this is the situation at the limits.
as for the idea it will get more people playing ascension, but less people will play main, so less new people will bother continuing as they just get pummelled by ultimate weapons (ms) which they cant do anything against, and so there will be no new flow into main or ascension
Please think carefully and reconsider
You realise that a MS will only power add to your ground troops which equals your raw stat?
-
Space2050
- Forum Newbie
- Posts: 30
- Joined: Mon Mar 07, 2005 11:45 am
Re: Mothership vs Ascension
Wish this was the case a week ago, lol.
- Darmo
- Forum Grunt
- Posts: 59
- Joined: Wed Nov 01, 2006 12:04 pm
- ID: 68660
- Location: COOKIE FACTORY
Re: Mothership vs Ascension
I feel like a turkey
lol
thanks for correcting me
i still believe my point is valid to an extent
lol
thanks for correcting me
i still believe my point is valid to an extent
Come to the dark side, we have cookies
4/07/2008
Anderial says:
I'm a helpful parasite
Trade Feedback: http://stargatewars.herebegames.com/vie ... 8&t=151691
4/07/2008
Anderial says:
I'm a helpful parasite
Trade Feedback: http://stargatewars.herebegames.com/vie ... 8&t=151691
- Antius
- Forum Regular
- Posts: 554
- Joined: Sat Jul 07, 2007 11:05 am
Re: Mothership vs Ascension
to an extent yes. but again no...compare it to planet defs. And how fleets get exponentially bigger in cost but fleet cost stays the same. If you complain about one, at least complain about the other.. .but its fine the way it is now. Amazing update Admin
Id=66719



