StarGateWars Forums

who attacks people for the sake of it without logic..thats just silly..

Tok`ra wrote:

killtacular wrote:How ironic tok'ra pointing the finger at someone spamming LOL what a joke.
All of that crap you posted only if you followed what you said.

Only then I will stop thinking your nothing but a joke.

I dont post just to attack other peoples posts, thats the differnce.

If I attack a viewpoint, I state WHY I disagree and use logic and fact to back up my point of view, instead of just outright attacking

*Ahem*

Tok` ra's topics are too intelligible to be spam.

*sigh* General really needs to be edge-uh-macated on these subjects

Just courious Wes, how many of your dream rules have you broken?

Provoked or not, how many?

Tok`ra wrote:

killtacular wrote:How ironic tok'ra pointing the finger at someone spamming LOL what a joke.
All of that crap you posted only if you followed what you said.

Only then I will stop thinking your nothing but a joke.

I dont post just to attack other peoples posts, thats the differnce.

If I attack a viewpoint, I state WHY I disagree and use logic and fact to back up my point of view, instead of just outright attacking

You beat people to a bloody pulp until they listen to you. You critisize the post , you pm a mod , you report the thread, you make another thread about the thread, you then ask why the mods do this aka double standards. Hell did I miss anything? All because the community really doesn't give 2 cents what you have to say because its always the same.

Oh my bad its 3 threads about a thread.
1. common sense
2. double standards
3. Can a mod define SGW General.

So count em up what 7 kicking and screaming look at me Im tokra , Im trying to change the forums things about 1 thread that was given the ok by the owner of the forums himself.

So I have 2 last words for you .

BAN TOK'RA

Tok`ra wrote:

killtacular wrote:1. common sense
2. double standards
3. Can a mod define SGW General./quote]

1- common sense was about a specific issue

2- double standards was abotu another.

3- define SGW general was about an issue dating back months, and Id infact made a thread about it shortly before my most recent permaban (those things just aint perma, lol)

Pay attention before you speak.

Lore wrote:Just courious Wes, how many of your dream rules have you broken?

Provoked or not, how many?

rule 2 on occasion (rare occasion), tho not latley. Posting about how you disagree and actualy posting WHY and going into detail does not count however as you actualy praticipate.

rule 3, a couple of times over the years, no more than many other people however.

You are so full of it

as for your rules Tok'ra....

5) mods will NOT need to specify reasoning behind what they do.
6) mods CAN be reported as abusing powers. This will be done to a specific 'complaint' thread[/b[, the mod in question reviewed IN ENTIRETY (ie [b]not for a specific single action) and a decision on whether the mod stays or not, is warned, etc made. (all mod actions, including delete/edit threads, are logged and recorded...).
Again - you can request a review of THE MOD, but not a single action/decision. Abuse of this system will remove your ability to report a mod and have it reviewed.

So all this you pointing out rules, I suggest you read them yourself first.

rule 5 should cover all tok'ras aurguements.

Tok`ra wrote:And thats complete bunk, considering what happens when they dont.

Ignorance- lack of knowledge

Stupidity- inability to squire new knowledge

Those that forget the mistakes of the past are doomed to repeat them

You make it sound as if there flies trying to get out of a window. We are human. Thats what makes us unique.