Page 2 of 2
Re: TITANS LEGION MULTI?
Posted: Mon Oct 29, 2007 9:44 pm
by Tacet
Hi all,
I've sent the details of what we're doing to adminMark. If he feels it's necessary he'll post it here.
Zeratul, your guess is a bit off the mark, though it can certainly happen. Haro himself has sold at least 14.6 mil UU in the last about 12 days (sorry, had to do the counting!

).
Squishie, remind me to never play chess against you!

Of the ID's that's posted here, only Carsomyr and myself ever have that naq out - the rest are simply Carsomyr's officers, and most of them (if not all) does not even have full supporter status.
T
Re: TITANS LEGION MULTI?
Posted: Tue Oct 30, 2007 1:00 am
by Cobolt
Huntalaar wrote:Cobolt wrote:Greetings, I am the leader of the T I T A N S alilance group.
T I T A N S Legion is our training alliance.
Quiztime..
I know it´s a tough one, but let´s se who gets it right..

Could it be...
# 1 a Multi since multi seems to be ppls universal answer to everything they don´t understand?
# 2 an invader from outher space that has infected the SGW computer with a virus?
# 3 an alliance bankingsystem for members that doesen´t have bankspace enough wich is run by two friends in south africa?

There is only 2 things that post could of been:
1. A failed insult,
or
2. You have mistaken our intelligence for yours?
Well, from where I come, that´s not a direct insult and wasn´t ment as one either, just used my low budget humor to say that I feel sorry that ppl always go for the "multi"... "cheater" option etc when they see something they don´t understand - I mean, why not just send a pm and ask in a polite way or inform an admin instead of dragging it publicly through the forum? In the best case scenario, the poster has succeded in making one of our better ideas publicly known and well, I feel that has damaged our alliance tactics and also our reputation so I feel I have some just cause to be somewhat annoyed.
I DO feel that Tacet and Carsomyr whom I have on MSN and has talked to simultaneously on several occasions is accused of something really bad and that don´t make me feel very comfortable either. If they indeed are a multi I would be totally fooled buy it, wich of course would be embarrassing but I think it would be higly unlikely, however admin will shure be able to see that through the logs in that case.
I must also make the point I see clearer - keeping trillions out on small accounts on ppt would be a VERY bad way to try to avoild detection for a multi... that´s why I´m ironic in my way of expression, I feel the baseline of this dialogue assumes that Tacet and Carsomyr not only is a multi but also pure stupid and I know it isn´t so.
Whatever the outcome, I feel this matter could have been solved in better way.
If I have insulted somone with the text above, I hereby appologize, I write in a foreign language and sometimes don´t grasp the language as a native.
Re: TITANS LEGION MULTI?
Posted: Thu Nov 01, 2007 12:05 am
by Zeratul
Tacet wrote:Zeratul, your guess is a bit off the mark, though it can certainly happen. Haro himself has sold at least 14.6 mil UU in the last about 12 days (sorry, had to do the counting!

).
we guessed that because it happened earlier here...
Re: TITANS LEGION MULTI?
Posted: Thu Nov 01, 2007 5:54 am
by Ciryu
tom twin wrote:or one is real, and he is passing the naq around his accounts as it builds up.
Passing the naq around would mean the IP would have to be diferent and this would prove they are not multies... so how can this be a answer to prove they are multies?
Re: TITANS LEGION MULTI?
Posted: Thu Nov 01, 2007 1:22 pm
by haro

well seems like they gave a decent story and side to what is going on. Maybe i was wrong but it just seems sorta suspicious. If I have wrongly accused forgive me. If i have not wrongly accused "bye"