StarGateWars Forums

Mordack wrote:Well, I'm glad you've gotten that off your chest..

Never mind that most of what you said is untrue, though.

Whats this? someone disagrees with someone else's opinion!? just not natural.

Apadamek[Economist] wrote:

Mordack wrote:Well, I'm glad you've gotten that off your chest..

Never mind that most of what you said is untrue, though.

Whats this? someone disagrees with someone else's opinion!? just not natural.

I meant the stuff you said about me as a player. About how I apparently ruin the game, and spend my days attacking people on these forums. I believe my edited post makes it clearer.

Mordack wrote:

Apadamek[Economist] wrote:

Mordack wrote:Well, I'm glad you've gotten that off your chest..

Never mind that most of what you said is untrue, though.

Whats this? someone disagrees with someone else's opinion!? just not natural.

I meant the stuff you said about me as a player. About how I apparently ruin the game, and spend my days attacking people on these forums. I believe my edited post makes it clearer.

Oh I know all about you. The whole Omega tag means nothing, most omega members aren't ruining the game and the few that are don't last long as omega members. No, all i know is what I see and what I've seen is you going around complaining and whining like a baby about a various amount of subjects.

For example the mod debacle, you cried "bias bias bias waa waa waa" and by that time my opinion of you was formed. Like I said your the type that thinks your cool and helps the situation while really just complaining. Your like an even more arrogant Tok'ra.

Tricky little attempt there to just write off my opinions as "Omega basher".

I complained about mod bias after a friend of mine was the victim of an unfair judgement. Given that said judgement was later overturned, and my friend recieved an apology, I think my behaviour falls under the banner of 'legitimate grievance' rather than 'unproductive whine.'

Mordack wrote:I complained about mod bias after a friend of mine was the victim of an unfair judgement. Given that said judgement was later overturned, and my friend recieved an apology, I think my behaviour falls under the banner of 'legitimate grievance' rather than 'unproductive whine.'

No i think that your friend should suck it up and move on. Your behavior falls under "successful whine" such as Tok'ra falls under "too annoying to stop."

Apadamek[Economist] wrote:

Mordack wrote:I complained about mod bias after a friend of mine was the victim of an unfair judgement. Given that said judgement was later overturned, and my friend recieved an apology, I think my behaviour falls under the banner of 'legitimate grievance' rather than 'unproductive whine.'

No i think that your friend should suck it up and move on. Your behavior falls under "successful whine" such as Tok'ra falls under "too annoying to stop."

Well, I'm glad this is just a forum. I certainly hope you don't take that attitude toward injustice in real life, Apademak. I dread to think what the world would be like if Martin Luther King had simply told the black civil rights movement to 'suck it up and move on' during his speech.

And haha, I just remembered the post you made begging for friends and 'tutors' from SGW. You'll forgive me if I take your assertions about my RL and attitude with a pinch of salt.

Mordack wrote:

Apadamek[Economist] wrote:

Mordack wrote:I complained about mod bias after a friend of mine was the victim of an unfair judgement. Given that said judgement was later overturned, and my friend recieved an apology, I think my behaviour falls under the banner of 'legitimate grievance' rather than 'unproductive whine.'

No i think that your friend should suck it up and move on. Your behavior falls under "successful whine" such as Tok'ra falls under "too annoying to stop."

Well, I'm glad this is just a forum. I certainly hope you don't take that attitude toward injustice in real life, Apademak. I dread to think what the world would be like if Martin Luther King had simply told the black civil rights movement to 'suck it up and move on' during his speech.

And haha, I just remembered the post you made begging for friends and 'tutors' from SGW. You'll forgive me if I take your assertions about my RL and attitude with a pinch of salt.

No incorrect, I never asked for friends here, I made friends here. I asked for tutors yes, why? It was a interesting thought and test I had about education through the internet, and I didn't beg, I offered payment.

And I never once mentioned your Real Life your real life means nothing to me, what you do on this forum means something to me. Nice attempt there too though.

As for Dr King, as I said this isn't real life, this is a forum. Newsflash, theres a difference.

EDIT: Your recycled insults bore me. What next? a ever sly comment about watches?

okay... all of this is getting over the top. SO WHAT IF WE HAVE DISAGREEMENTS. SO WHAT IF WE DONT LIKE EACH OTHERS POSTING. SPAMMERS AND GENERAL USERS. FIGHTING ISNT WHAT WE NEED NOW. PLEASE STOP HERE AND MAKE AN EFFORT TO CO EXIST. YES WHAT HAS HAPPENED THUS FAR CANT BE IGNORED HOWEVER WE SHOULD AT LEAST TRY TO MEND THE WOUNDS AND MOVE ON. AND I INCLUDE MYSELF WHEN I SAY WE NEED TO MOVE ON AND ACT LIKE CIVILISED MATURE PEOPLE. THE SPAM TEMPLE IS THERE FOR A REASON. SAME WITH GENERAL.

GET OVER IT.

What is the difference between this and that and the spam temple? I only post in this and that and that is the answer right there. Even though some of the topics in this and that are close to topics in the spam temple the spam temple lacks a serious tone. If you want humor play around in the spam temple, if you want more serious debates and discussions then stay here in this and that.

T&T= Serious R&R
Spam Temple= Light hearted R&R

Bad Wolf, Mordack, I'd personally like to thank you for your "compliment". Perhaps a spammer could put together a sig bar quoting these two wise men who have spent so much time researching the spam temple that they feel inclined to label an entire usergroup idiotic. I'm sure Spacey and Pookie would agree with your judgement. Please, continue to bathe us in your fountain of wisdom in how you feel the spam temple should continue to exist.

Jack, Appy... just because General posters are a bit more serious than spammers doesn't make all of them grumpy warmongers (or stat builders) and certainly not all of them are babyish. Try to stick to a certain etiquitte with those that don't frequent the Temple.

Semper wrote:spam temple = anything goes, you can make a topic starting with a smiley.

This and that = have to stay on topic, and generally has to have a point.

so: what's the point of this now?

9 out of 10 spammers are poor ingame.

Think about it.




And Appy next time you want my help dont even ask.

BW

Bad Wolf wrote:9 out of 10 spammers are poor ingame.

Think about it.

Very true. Personally, I only play the game for fun, not to see if I can get a 200 mil army before my alliancemates. That attitude only changes for war threads or discussions (ironically) in T&T that are on issues I'm interested in, such as current events and history, etc. For the most part though, I scan General and GalCol then head to the spam temple for a laugh.

But, I doubt my posting more is going to influence either of you to change your views of myself and other spammers, so this will be my last post unless you really want me to respond, which I suspect not. Good day to all and I apologize if offended either BW or Mordack; I tend to be very sarcastic in some cases.

BTW- seeing as this question has been answered a dozen times, does this thread need to be open still?

[quote="Bad Wolf"]9 out of 10 spammers are poor ingame.

where did u get these statistics?

Jack wrote:Army size =/= intelligence much like post count =/= penis size

Great analogy Jack, especially considering your post count