Page 2 of 3
Re: REK
Posted: Tue Nov 13, 2007 8:10 am
by RepliJake
Zeratul wrote:have you considered the possibility that that person was solely following the rules? (3 warn = 7 day ban)
Yes.
Re: REK
Posted: Tue Nov 13, 2007 12:15 pm
by Reschef
uhm ... I don't know why this happened, but I'm quite surprised ...
![Shocked :shock:](./images/smilies/icon_eek.gif)
Re: REK
Posted: Tue Nov 13, 2007 1:17 pm
by Zeratul
he was spamming too much in too many topics...
he's going to be allowed to return in a few days... (approximately sunday)
Re: REK
Posted: Tue Nov 13, 2007 1:31 pm
by PSICOLIX
3 warn = ban? what a idiot rule...
3 warn ever? or per week?
lol, becuase things like this no1 see me in the forums...
Re: REK
Posted: Tue Nov 13, 2007 1:38 pm
by Zeratul
3 warns total, all within last 90 days...
certain things might cause ban earlier... but that would require truly bad behavior...
Re: REK
Posted: Tue Nov 13, 2007 2:02 pm
by geisha
Who ever banned REK is an idiot.
Re: REK
Posted: Tue Nov 13, 2007 2:24 pm
by laird
PSICOLIX wrote:3 warn = ban? what a idiot rule...
3 warn ever? or per week?
lol, becuase things like this no1 see me in the forums...
I feel the same PSICOLIX...As can be seen by the amount of posts I have.... Lets get real and stop with the power trips that some of you mods have....
![Very Happy :D](./images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif)
Re: REK
Posted: Tue Nov 13, 2007 3:53 pm
by 1horseman
As is Laird, I am also affraid of posting on the forums-I mainly stick to the market where I feel I am safe-I think so at least.
Re: REK
Posted: Tue Nov 13, 2007 4:21 pm
by PSICOLIX
Jack wrote:laird wrote:PSICOLIX wrote:3 warn = ban? what a idiot rule...
3 warn ever? or per week?
lol, becuase things like this no1 see me in the forums...
I feel the same PSICOLIX...As can be seen by the amount of posts I have.... Lets get real and stop with the power trips that some of you mods have....
![Very Happy :D](./images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif)
This has been a rule for the last 3 or so years now, and you guys are just now complaining
![Rolling Eyes :roll:](./images/smilies/icon_rolleyes.gif)
last time i cheked the rules was JUST guidelines... so its natural cross they sometimes, you just can't do always.
i had never heard of some1 be banned for this...
90 Days timeframe? lol. its like we can only be pissed 1 time per month... i wish i coude aply something like that to my GF...
Re: REK
Posted: Tue Nov 13, 2007 4:36 pm
by Juliette
PSICOLIX wrote:last time i cheked the rules was JUST guidelines... so its natural cross they sometimes, you just can't do always.
Rule:
1. a principle or regulation
governing conduct, action, procedure, arrangement, etc.: the rules of chess.
Guideline:
1. A statement or other
indication of policy or procedure by which
to determine a course of action: guidelines for the completion of tax returns.
Rules cannot be guidelines. Guidelines can be derived from Rules, but the inherent difference in prevalence is obvious: Rules prevail over Guidelines.
Rules are not Guidelines, even if said they are. Semantic impossibility.
How about I tell a cop that his "Rules and Laws" are actually just guidelines.. that's just too much of a Pirates quote.
Re: REK
Posted: Tue Nov 13, 2007 4:49 pm
by High Empty
Re: REK
Posted: Tue Nov 13, 2007 6:50 pm
by laird
This ones for you REK......
![Very Happy :D](./images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif)
Re: REK
Posted: Tue Nov 13, 2007 7:32 pm
by PSICOLIX
Auriel wrote:Rules cannot be guidelines. Guidelines can be derived from Rules, but the inherent difference in prevalence is obvious: Rules prevail over Guidelines.
Rules are not Guidelines, even if said they are. Semantic impossibility.
well, check this:
Forum Administrator wrote:NOTE: These rules are guidelines. It is the spirit of these rules that must be followed, and not the technicalities of the wording.
-admin jason.
Don't blame me, blame jason...
Re: REK
Posted: Tue Nov 13, 2007 10:08 pm
by Zeratul
the rule on first 3 warn = 7day suspend, is one of the rules that are set in stone...
now, if you want to complain further, feel free to take it up with teal'auc ingame...
we ourselves had nothing to do with REKs suspension...
Re: REK
Posted: Tue Nov 13, 2007 10:43 pm
by Zeratul
teal'auc likes massing... thats why she rarely has large defense...