StarGateWars Forums

buck wrote:Well that, and if you start suspending people for masking..

You get suspended for 3 warnings. Also I did not announce the rule being in effect, i announced the suggestion of it.

I suggested that any masking results in a warning. You don't need to add F to OMG to get your point across. You wouldn't accept a GTHO so why accept the f in any other words? or even in a STHU?

AS for suspending, I'm coming back, it wasn't my decision to suspend people after 3 warnings, and I clearly did not state that masking would land you a suspension.

As for my responsibilities, I wish I could say more here but I can't. Instead I'll simply point at the instabilities of certain ppl, for example the quit and come back, or the fact rie,

'no offence' but i think u should die
thats exactly what uve been saying all along
"no disrepect mystake but u this u that"

so unless you're actually goign to try to do something constructive in this thread that is for the overall greater good, don't bother at all.

The point here is that the rule exists but is half enforced. The goal is to modify the rule so that it is instead, strictly enforced.

And ombudsman was an incorrectly used word. AND, if you want me to be the ppl's voice, the community is unstable, rules are being half enforced. Well this is step one to creating stable rules.
Happy kids?

Mr Mystake wrote:As for my responsibilities, I wish I could say more here but I can't. Instead I'll simply point at the instabilities of certain ppl, for example the quit and come back, or the fact rie,

'no offence' but i think u should die
thats exactly what uve been saying all along
"no disrepect mystake but u this u that"

so unless you're actually goign to try to do something constructive in this thread that is for the overall greater good, don't bother at all.

*chuckles* Well, I must have added something constructive in, because Hidden agreed with my point.


As for the FEW "no offense, Mystake, but" that I've said in the mod section, the first half were constructive critisism. Then I stated I don't believe you're the right person for this job, and since then I haven't brought you up or said that at all.

And I never once told you to die. Come on now, Mystake. This is a job. This is what I've been talking about about people taking things too seriously. Seperate yourself from the job, mate, and you won't feel so insulted.

Will it help if I go out of my way and state that I still like you as a player and a person?





PS: (and edit in) with some of what you've been saying to other people IN PRIVATE you should be glad I'm still keeping this on a not personal level. It's a shame the people who's voice you're supposed to represent can't see what you've been saying with their voice in private.

Why dont you do something constuctive in this thread, Rename it to "iquit" and then, i dont know...quit.

You have no idea how the forum is run, you have no idea how to run a forum, all you want is power, and you will not be getting that, I suggest the forum public ask to vote for a new representive, one that is not seduced by power, one that actually cares about them, and one that isnt such an idiot.

You are clueless, you are half a job, You are incompetant, I have had enough of your power trips.

wait? what's going on here? I thought this thread was about masking and our opinion on whether it should be a rule or not.

However, given mystake's hostility toward me -- I don't really mind the direction this is going. Looks like you've shown your true self to the rest of the mod-team luc.

Just for the record I never wanted mystake as my representative due to his biased nature and inability to separate ingame actions and fights from forum actions.

buck wrote:You are clueless, you are half a job, You are incompetant, I have had enough of your power trips.

maybe its time to post the incompetence of the moderator team?

We've got mods not want to come back on their mistake because it'll show that they made a mistake.
We've got mods who no one even likes
We've got mods who take things too seriously
We've got mods who have double standards
We've got mods with no balls
We've got mods who can't even work as a team
We've got mods who've been mods for so long that they don't realize they are beyond their "peak" and need to be replaced
We've got mods who want me out simply because they don't like me
We've got mods who fuel other people's fire
We've got mods who don't even respect their head admin, and bicker him and talk him down
We've got mods who don't want to work with the head admin
We've got mods who don't know the definition of "retiring" or "moving on"
We've got mods who think they do a good job but don't
And most of all, we've got mods who don't contribute at all.



Am I really so bad? Because I want a little change? You want to remove the Mods power to ban, I want to enforce a rule that is part of a complaint of user a b and c saying user x y z didn't get in trouble while they did.


Edit
We've also got a very encouraging moderator team
We've got mods who clearly have goals set out
And I don't know what this thread had to do with any of this
viewtopic.php?f=85&t=96942&start=0

Taxonomist3 wrote:However, given mystake's hostility toward me -- I don't really mind the direction this is going. Looks like you've shown your true self to the rest of the mod-team luc.

The only true colors shown were yours.
On the other hand, we've seen a few more colors in this thread then just mine. Quite honestly on the whole, the moderator team is 85% incompetent, and I got my eyes opened when the mod forums were "unlocked" to my eyes.

Mr Mystake wrote:

buck wrote:You are clueless, you are half a job, You are incompetant, I have had enough of your power trips.

maybe its time to post the incompetence of the moderator team?

We've got mods not want to come back on their mistake because it'll show that they made a mistake.
We've got mods who no one even likes
We've got mods who take things too seriously
We've got mods who have double standards
We've got mods with no balls
We've got mods who can't even work as a team
We've got mods who've been mods for so long that they don't realize they are beyond their "peak" and need to be replaced
We've got mods who want me out simply because they don't like me
We've got mods who fuel other people's fire
We've got mods who don't even respect their head admin, and bicker him and talk him down
We've got mods who don't want to work with the head admin
We've got mods who don't know the definition of "retiring" or "moving on"
We've got mods who think they do a good job but don't
And most of all, we've got mods who don't contribute at all.



Am I really so bad? Because I want a little change? You want to remove the Mods power to ban, I want to enforce a rule that is part of a complaint of user a b and c saying user x y z didn't get in trouble while they did.

exactly my point, You want a little change, whereas i want a radical change, in the grand scheme of things, my change is better, mostly because it will leave the public trusting mods more, And knowing that even if they are biased there is only so much they can do and so far they can go.

And yes your right, i dont like you, Mostly because of the way youve acted over the past few weeks, but thats certainly not the reason i want you out, i want you out for alot of reasons but as always, personal is not one of them. As for all the nonsense youve said about mods being past it etc, its modding, its not sport, you get better with age, not worse, i agree some mods DO need to go and i have given my opinion on those mods to Smooshable, As for you? You are that bad, Because you simply dont have a clue.

the moderator team is 85% incompetent,

What a completely Made up statistic that Is, Your looseing credability by the second, Now your makeing stats up out of thin air?!?!!?!

This is hilarious, Please stand down now before you embarras yourself any further.

As I said my eyes were opened up by the moderator forum.


it shows ALOT about the people who mod this forum.

But I listed the problems.

I guess the other problem is that half the community doesnt even like the mods.

Also if you want radical change, and this is how I'd have it;
Stricter enforcement of the rules, but then we'd have different rules.
The problem with them is theres too much interpretation of the rules. If you've got strict guidelines, then tada! You know what u can punish for!

Ppl will walk between the lines if stepping over them gives em a little zap.




What a completely Made up statistic that Is, Your looseing credability by the second, Now your makeing stats up out of thin air?!?!!?!

Not a statistic, an Opinion. I think we have a few good mods, but I think everyone else needs to get flushed out.

Mr Mystake wrote:As I said my eyes were opened up by the moderator forum.


it shows ALOT about the people who mod this forum.

But I listed the problems.

I guess the other problem is that half the community doesnt even like the mods.

Also if you want radical change, and this is how I'd have it;
Stricter enforcement of the rules, but then we'd have different rules.
The problem with them is theres too much interpretation of the rules. If you've got strict guidelines, then tada! You know what u can punish for!

Ppl will walk between the lines if stepping over them gives em a little zap.




What a completely Made up statistic that Is, Your looseing credability by the second, Now your makeing stats up out of thin air?!?!!?!

Not a statistic, an Opinion. I think we have a few good mods, but I think everyone else needs to get flushed out.

Your talking nosense yet again, its a good job it ISNT up to you.

Because if we had it your way the forum would be a concentration camp, And the mods would have SS armbands. A forum has to be loose, Otherwise it is no longer a public forum, It is a set of rules.

Yes

anytime someone breaks the rules we'll send them into an oven

and buck is our first forum nazi !!

yay!

great SS reference


You and me have never spoken on MSN. You do not get to tell me whether I would do a good job or not. There's only one way to find out. I can't see how you've contributed other then saying mods dont get to ban.

This wouldn't be a concentration camp
if it was explain to me how the last community i head admined survived for 4 years before I decided it was my time to go? (at which point the community itself fell apart AFTER i left under the new head admin)

Let me say this is a reflection of the moderator forums.

Mr Mystake wrote:Yes

anytime someone breaks the rules we'll send them into an oven

and buck is our first forum bad !!

yay!

great SS reference


You and me have never spoken on MSN. You do not get to tell me whether I would do a good job or not. There's only one way to find out. I can't see how you've contributed other then saying mods dont get to ban.

This wouldn't be a concentration camp
if it was explain to me how the last community i head admined survived for 4 years before I decided it was my time to go? (at which point the community itself fell apart AFTER i left under the new head admin)

Whats this? Makeing Up forum communities you admined?

And yes, i DO get to tell you that you are in NO way good for this job, You know why i get to tell you, Because the chances are i speak to more forum users and have done in my time here than you EVER will. And Youve only backed me up by showing what you want, "i was a head admin blah blah blah" You dont have to speak to someone on msn to realise they are the wrong tool for the wrong job, You are a tool Mystake, But not the correct one thats for sure.

well if we can have a talk about rules i think all mods should be over the age 18 min .. the younger they are the more they love the power trip.. an older person would have allot more common sense on how things should be done.

the older the better i would say.

buck wrote:Whats this? Makeing Up forum communities you admined?

And yes, i DO get to tell you that you are in NO way good for this job, You know why i get to tell you, Because the chances are i speak to more forum users and have done in my time here than you EVER will. And Youve only backed me up by showing what you want, "i was a head admin blah blah blah" You dont have to speak to someone on msn to realise they are the wrong tool for the wrong job, You are a tool Mystake, But not the correct one thats for sure.

yes! I make up forum communities in my spare time! Wee I also try to initiate coup's!

Every dog has his day, you had yours buck.
Also, it shows that the team works so well together when they call each other Tool's, doesn't it?
BTW, please don't leave the mods and come back in 2 months because the mods can't work togther and u hope by then that its fixed, maybe this time u can stay around.

Mr Mystake wrote:As I said my eyes were opened up by the moderator forum.


it shows ALOT about the people who mod this forum.

But I listed the problems.

I guess the other problem is that half the community doesnt even like the mods.

Also if you want radical change, and this is how I'd have it;
Stricter enforcement of the rules, but then we'd have different rules.
The problem with them is theres too much interpretation of the rules. If you've got strict guidelines, then tada! You know what u can punish for!

Ppl will walk between the lines if stepping over them gives em a little zap.




What a completely Made up statistic that Is, Your looseing credability by the second, Now your makeing stats up out of thin air?!?!!?!

Not a statistic, an Opinion. I think we have a few good mods, but I think everyone else needs to get flushed out.

interpretation of the rules can only lead to bad something should be done about that but
dont make them stricter though you can be lenient without chaos ensuing

and you can make up statistics and people will believe them 85% of the time