Re: Naq hiting while at war and the bs that follows
Posted: Thu Sep 25, 2008 11:01 am
clarkey wrote:lol who revived this post.
Don't look at me...
Teal'auc
Don't look at me...
Teal'auc
StarGateWars Forums
These are the forums for the GateWa.rs family of text-based space-centred PBBGs
https://talk.gatewa.rs/
Naq hiting while at war and the bs that follows
Page 2 of 2
Don't look at me...
Teal'auc
Re: Naq hiting while at war and the bs that follows
Posted: Thu Sep 25, 2008 11:06 am
Teal'auc of the Tok'ra wrote:clarkey wrote:lol who revived this post.
Don't look at me...
Teal'auc
lol, is that a subtle hint that you have a multi called multi?
Re: Naq hiting while at war and the bs that follows
Posted: Thu Sep 25, 2008 11:07 am
Semper wrote:lol, is that a subtle hint that you have a multi called multi?
Lol, i have only one other account...
And it is actually the name of a Tok'ra host
So BOOOO!
Teal'auc
EDIT: forum account, before someone jumps to conclusions...
Re: Naq hiting while at war and the bs that follows
Posted: Thu Sep 25, 2008 11:10 am
Teal'auc of the Tok'ra wrote:Semper wrote:lol, is that a subtle hint that you have a multi called multi?
Lol, i have only one other account...
And it is actually the name of a Tok'ra host
So BOOOO!
Teal'auc
Like I bother to concern myself with the names of rebellious scum jenny...
and after all you are Tok'ra, so you could be deceiving me...
Re: Naq hiting while at war and the bs that follows
Posted: Fri Sep 26, 2008 5:36 am
'vultures' are okay, better they get the naq than your enemy
Re: Naq hiting while at war and the bs that follows
Posted: Fri Sep 26, 2008 5:50 am
Lajh wrote:'vultures' are okay, better they get the naq than your enemy
Actually I'd rather have the enemy take naq rather than someone who's done nothing to deserve taking it.
Re: Naq hiting while at war and the bs that follows
Posted: Fri Sep 26, 2008 6:00 am
Teal'auc of the Tok'ra wrote:Well, you hit my alliance, I mass you..
I sleep bad - I mass you...
You talk smack against me - I mass you...
Teal'auc
i couldnt agree more... although u missed a couple...
i get bored - i mass you
i find ur name annoying - -i mass you
i hear somthin i dislike about you - i mass you
someone else gives me a excuse of some sort - i mass you
i get paid - i mass you
i think ya get the point
Re: Naq hiting while at war and the bs that follows
Posted: Fri Sep 26, 2008 9:23 am
teesdale wrote:i couldnt agree more... although u missed a couple...
i get bored - i mass you
i find ur name annoying - -i mass you
i hear somthin i dislike about you - i mass you
someone else gives me a excuse of some sort - i mass you
i get paid - i mass you
i think ya get the point
I'm not that radical
I'm staying with the 'i sleep bad - I mass you' thing
Teal'auc
Re: Naq hiting while at war and the bs that follows
Posted: Fri Sep 26, 2008 3:52 pm
Lajh wrote:'vultures' are okay, better they get the naq than your enemy
True.
I never understand what the hell is wrong with vulturing, AS LONG as it's NOT turn farming. Then it's taking advantage and not cool at all and needs strike back like if they are in war.
Re: Naq hiting while at war and the bs that follows
Posted: Fri Sep 26, 2008 5:54 pm
Teal'auc of the Tok'ra wrote:Well, you hit my alliance, I mass you..
I sleep bad - I mass you...
You talk smack against me - I mass you...
Teal'auc
I love it!
Re: Naq hiting while at war and the bs that follows
Posted: Fri Sep 26, 2008 6:19 pm
*slips a sleeping pill in Jenny's drink*
Some people talk the vulture crap some dont, I have a different term for vulture, its just a lame excuse for them to mass you, ect.
Some people talk the vulture crap some dont, I have a different term for vulture, its just a lame excuse for them to mass you, ect.
Re: Naq hiting while at war and the bs that follows
Posted: Sat Sep 27, 2008 1:39 am
I have no problem with people vulturing me, as long as they have no problem with being savagely massed over it
Re: Naq hiting while at war and the bs that follows
Posted: Wed Oct 01, 2008 4:48 am
I think players who hit others whilst they are at war and then when you hit back they say they will mass you then that is fine. Bring it.
However, what I get annoyed about is that either your officers or smaller members of your alliance get massed for that.
So, you need to think about it before hitting back.
Even if those members are happy to be hit in war by those not involved, then it should be stated by that alliance, as some individuals as stated above are more then happy about it, but when fellow members look through attack logs then they will go and mass that alliance for vulturing.
This to me is cowardice. The alliance leader should state that anyone hitting during them at war will be massed or vultures will be tolerated or keep it to that player only. Honour in the community
And if you are in a war and you have naq out and not actually repairing your weps then shame on the enemy for letting that happen.
In most cases, I will retaliate against those who hit me if they are at war, but more then happy to broker naq back (minus what is costs to fix weps etc) to them.
However, what I get annoyed about is that either your officers or smaller members of your alliance get massed for that.
So, you need to think about it before hitting back.
Even if those members are happy to be hit in war by those not involved, then it should be stated by that alliance, as some individuals as stated above are more then happy about it, but when fellow members look through attack logs then they will go and mass that alliance for vulturing.
This to me is cowardice. The alliance leader should state that anyone hitting during them at war will be massed or vultures will be tolerated or keep it to that player only. Honour in the community
And if you are in a war and you have naq out and not actually repairing your weps then shame on the enemy for letting that happen.
In most cases, I will retaliate against those who hit me if they are at war, but more then happy to broker naq back (minus what is costs to fix weps etc) to them.