StarGateWars Forums

Angnoch wrote:so you are gonna go ahead and tell me a real live person died and then came back to life, Jesus existed but the sheer impossibility of that isnt lost on you is it

second 2 cents on that:
actually, if human being is defined as certain system of atoms put together and brought to life by electric impulses, coming back to life is physicaly possible.

Angnoch wrote:so you are gonna go ahead and tell me a real live person died and then came back to life, Jesus existed but the sheer impossibility of that isnt lost on you is it

Actually I will sit here and tell you that a person died and came back to life.
See what you should of said was you are gonna tell me that a person died for three days and then came to life. However since you did not say it like that you left yourself open for this.

The 29-year-old singer was strolling down that path July 13th, 1996,

when he overdosed on heroin backstage after a Pantera show at

Coca-Cola Starplex. Paramedics revived him, and the singer issued a

press release four days later saying, "I, Philip H. Anselmo ...

injected a lethal dose of heroin into my arm, and died for four to

five minutes," the statement said. "...I have recovered completely and

the Pantera tour continues uninterrupted."

Ha ha ha ha! LMAO. Put that in your pipe and smoke it.


Semper ya muppet I do have an arse. I am not shoving anything up thank you very much.

Merry Christmas all.

Happy holidays for the politically correct people.

ok I apologize I was not specific enough and for that *claps* good catch

Semper wrote:

vinny d wrote:Yeah except those guys are works of fiction. Jesus actually did exist. Some may not believe his teachings or what he did, that is not the discussion. You can not deny the fact that he did exist. Historical records prove it. So take that and shove it up yodas butt if he has one.

Excuse me... Michale Shanks, Frank Oz, Keanu Reeves, and Alec Guiness are not works of fiction.

You can sit there and happily tell me all you want that Jesus was holy and all that, but there is as much proof that he did what he did, as there is for the above doing what they did. The only difference is, people are certain all the aboves miracles were due clever technical work. Jesus has doubt as to the falsness of his argument because of fear, generations of conditioning and the fact there are no records other then a 2000 year old misguided book of morals to prove what he did was done. For all we know in 2000years Michale Shanks may be in just the same position. Did he ascend and come back? Prove to me he didnt.

Lol..so shove that up thou owns arse..if thou has one.

wow your good

and jack i guess they weren't dead then

oh and presents encourage giving and spending time together i mean seriously do you want to spend the whole day with your entire family siting at a table staring at eachother because your so bored

vinny d wrote:Happy holidays for the politically correct people.

not for me...

<<<< is politically incorrect

OMG!! thanx a mill! it's sooooo totally cool loik!!

well i try not to offend ppl, but the pc stuff does go too far...

(a company over here recently reversed its decision about its instore santa's... they werent able to say 'ho ho ho' cos of the derogotory term (im not gonna type it... you get the idea...) MAINLY USED IN SOME REGIONS OF THE USA... THIS IS AUSTRALIA!)

*facepalm*

*joins jack and corran*

Trust me, I hate that PC correct **Filtered** so much. It is a bunch of BS.

Corran Horn wrote:

Semper wrote:

vinny d wrote:Yeah except those guys are works of fiction. Jesus actually did exist. Some may not believe his teachings or what he did, that is not the discussion. You can not deny the fact that he did exist. Historical records prove it. So take that and shove it up yodas butt if he has one.

Excuse me... Michale Shanks, Frank Oz, Keanu Reeves, and Alec Guiness are not works of fiction.

You can sit there and happily tell me all you want that Jesus was holy and all that, but there is as much proof that he did what he did, as there is for the above doing what they did. The only difference is, people are certain all the aboves miracles were due clever technical work. Jesus has doubt as to the falsness of his argument because of fear, generations of conditioning and the fact there are no records other then a 2000 year old misguided book of morals to prove what he did was done. For all we know in 2000years Michale Shanks may be in just the same position. Did he ascend and come back? Prove to me he didnt.

Lol..so shove that up thou owns arse..if thou has one.

hint: to avoid being called a muppet due to total compromitation of yer logical thinking skills ya should re-read yer first post, vinny's post and re-edit yers last.

There is no such word as 'compromitation' in the english language, and if you want to use the words closest to it, then you used it in conjunction with the wrong sentence ( or context) to! So to avoid being called a muppet by me, do not use words made up by europeans and added to our language until its in the dictonary, especially when ur trying to look cool and end up being proven otherwise. oh and also...once again Corran, you have given me a wonderful display of your logical thinking, or rather your phenomenal lack of it.

HINT: Your out of your league to be giving hints, come back when your ready.

Jack wrote:Yeah and? If all our technology today can be fooled into thinking the people were dead, then how much easier would it be for people 2000 years to be fooled in someone is dead when they really are not?

it still doesnt change the fact that they wouldnt actually be dead.......

Semper wrote:There is no such word as 'compromitation' in the english language, and if you want to use the words closest to it, then you used it in conjunction with the wrong sentence ( or context) to! So to avoid being called a muppet by me, do not use words made up by europeans and added to our language until its in the dictonary, especially when ur trying to look cool and end up being proven otherwise.

"compromitation"?? i realy wrote this??

oops! i did... sorry for using our slang here

this word is basicaly a noun created from verb "to compromise" (as in compromise yourself or compromise your principles/standards) by adding "tation". (we used to play with words like this when at uni). so it was used in the right context.
and yes... it was made up by europeans...

Semper wrote:oh and also...once again Corran, you have given me a wonderful display of your logical thinking, or rather your phenomenal lack of it.

where exactly could that lack be found?

We all know christmas is commercial.
We get gifts & I'm good with it.

@resurrection discussion: Obi Wan & co resurrected on a MOVIE and these were NOT REAL things, it was ACTING!
Unlike Jesus.

Apophis The Great wrote:We all know christmas is commercial.
We get gifts & I'm good with it.

@resurrection discussion: Obi Wan & co resurrected on a MOVIE and these were NOT REAL things, it was ACTING!
Unlike Jesus.

How do you know Jesus was even dead when he was buried the first time? Premature burials were very common in ancient days, even now with our amazing medical technology, coffin companies still make "Safety" Coffins. One has an intercom in it to call for help, if you find yourself buried alive!

hmm.. how about making sure they're 100% dead?

Pfft embalming, it's not even mandatory in the U.S.