Re: Realm: I Will Conquer
Posted: Wed Dec 12, 2007 6:38 pm
FEARLESS wrote:How come I can't farm him? It's like he has 0 naq per turn.
he has next to nothing, plus hes farmed every turn plus he can cut his income to 0, hes admin
These are the forums for the GateWa.rs family of text-based space-centred PBBGs
https://talk.gatewa.rs/
FEARLESS wrote:How come I can't farm him? It's like he has 0 naq per turn.
FEARLESS wrote:that's just cheating...
SA. wrote:Yeahhhh hellsing i laugh cause your sigs spelt wrong...
Lore wrote:SA. wrote:Yeahhhh hellsing i laugh cause your sigs spelt wrong...
English may not be his native language. It is also not polite, and a forum rule to not make fun of someones spelling or grammer.
Mojo Rising wrote:And really, come on now. How often and effectively are the rules enforced on the Forums. According to his MSN signature, Tok'ra is on his fifth permaban from the SGW forums and still continues to post more than any three people combined. While I agree that we shouldn't make fun of people's grammatical and spelling errors, there are sometimes when it is just impossible or painful to try and decipher the meaning from some people's "butchering" of English (whether because they are ESLers, drunk, or just plain ignorant) and I do believe that we should be able to call into question certain aspects of their posts for clarification, in a polite and constructive way of course.
How often and effectively are the rules enforced on the Forums.
Lore wrote:Mojo Rising wrote:And really, come on now. How often and effectively are the rules enforced on the Forums. According to his MSN signature, Tok'ra is on his fifth permaban from the SGW forums and still continues to post more than any three people combined. While I agree that we shouldn't make fun of people's grammatical and spelling errors, there are sometimes when it is just impossible or painful to try and decipher the meaning from some people's "butchering" of English (whether because they are ESLers, drunk, or just plain ignorant) and I do believe that we should be able to call into question certain aspects of their posts for clarification, in a polite and constructive way of course.
I do agree and have no problem with that,,,, this was not one of those situations tho.
And as forHow often and effectively are the rules enforced on the Forums.
I'll agree, I push for more "proper" enforcement, and for actual punishments. Thats a different story.