Page 11 of 12

Re: Is "Slave-Trading" the new "Feeding"??

Posted: Tue Jan 03, 2012 12:49 am
by emolution
im curios tho was nitro banned for feeding or the high suspicions of being a multi

Re: Is "Slave-Trading" the new "Feeding"??

Posted: Tue Jan 03, 2012 1:22 am
by Scenester
emolution wrote:im curios tho was nitro banned for feeding or the high suspicions of being a multi


Banned for multi-ing not for feeding, kram is gone too.
Feeding isnt against the rules :roll:

Re: Is "Slave-Trading" the new "Feeding"??

Posted: Tue Jan 03, 2012 4:22 am
by Teyla
Im led to believe its both :smt117

Re: Is "Slave-Trading" the new "Feeding"??

Posted: Tue Jan 03, 2012 4:36 pm
by ™THE_LEGEND™
Scenester wrote:
emolution wrote:im curios tho was nitro banned for feeding or the high suspicions of being a multi


Banned for multi-ing not for feeding, kram is gone too.
Feeding isnt against the rules :roll:




HOW many times have we stated this on here Scenester??? :smt050 Like they all apparently aren't listening, FEEDING isnt against the rules, its multiing that is.

Where Malbrega A.k.A Nitro went wrong is using multis to farm with then farm the multis, now if he had his friends feed him that is definately different and is not against the rules. Trust me tons and tons of people have had friends help them over the years, and a bunch of you dont realize that some guys sell their UU to people, well since we cant trade on QW raiding then being raided is the new trading. I am not defended malbrega for her actions, I am just saying... She was in the wrong to use multis, but not to feed. Get it right! Thanks and next time, Please listen to what Scenester says, cause its actually pretty good stuff coming out of those fingers!!! :smt115

Re: Is "Slave-Trading" the new "Feeding"??

Posted: Tue Jan 03, 2012 5:17 pm
by ™THE_LEGEND™
Scenester wrote:
emolution wrote:im curios tho was nitro banned for feeding or the high suspicions of being a multi


Feeding isnt against the rules :roll:






Appears feeding is illegal.... Got this from the Game Updates link in the top left hand corner... After Teyla brought it to my attention

Feb, 2011 - ERA 26 - Solar Flare Powered Quantum Duplication Feeding
Feeding -or using one account solely to power another - is against the rules. There are ingame stoppers -such as limiting maximum gain per attack to a days worth of income, more or less. But the practise of using one or more accounts solely to feed one main account is against the rules. Account caught abusing this will be banned"

Re: Is "Slave-Trading" the new "Feeding"??

Posted: Tue Jan 03, 2012 6:44 pm
by Retribution
™THE_LEGEND™ wrote:Appears feeding is illegal.... Got this from the Game Updates link in the top left hand corner... After Teyla brought it to my attention

Feb, 2011 - ERA 26 - Solar Flare Powered Quantum Duplication Feeding
Feeding -or using one account solely to power another - is against the rules. There are ingame stoppers -such as limiting maximum gain per attack to a days worth of income, more or less. But the practise of using one or more accounts solely to feed one main account is against the rules. Account caught abusing this will be banned"


Yes, we've all posted this a billion times. (Scenester was obviously making a joke) That's why it's effing annoying that all you have to do is donate to the site and you're apparently untouchable.

Re: Is "Slave-Trading" the new "Feeding"??

Posted: Tue Jan 03, 2012 9:53 pm
by Abhi
Retribution wrote:
™THE_LEGEND™ wrote:Appears feeding is illegal.... Got this from the Game Updates link in the top left hand corner... After Teyla brought it to my attention

Feb, 2011 - ERA 26 - Solar Flare Powered Quantum Duplication Feeding
Feeding -or using one account solely to power another - is against the rules. There are ingame stoppers -such as limiting maximum gain per attack to a days worth of income, more or less. But the practise of using one or more accounts solely to feed one main account is against the rules. Account caught abusing this will be banned"


Yes, we've all posted this a billion times. (Scenester was obviously making a joke) That's why it's effing annoying that all you have to do is donate to the site and you're apparently untouchable.


Not quite. Hippy has donated (even if it was just for the PPT) and has had people buy USS for his account but he got banned by mistake.

I guess it depends on the cycle of the blue moon... :smt021

Re: Is "Slave-Trading" the new "Feeding"??

Posted: Wed Jan 04, 2012 2:22 am
by Scenester
Abhi wrote:
Retribution wrote:
™THE_LEGEND™ wrote:Appears feeding is illegal.... Got this from the Game Updates link in the top left hand corner... After Teyla brought it to my attention

Feb, 2011 - ERA 26 - Solar Flare Powered Quantum Duplication Feeding
Feeding -or using one account solely to power another - is against the rules. There are ingame stoppers -such as limiting maximum gain per attack to a days worth of income, more or less. But the practise of using one or more accounts solely to feed one main account is against the rules. Account caught abusing this will be banned"


Yes, we've all posted this a billion times. (Scenester was obviously making a joke) That's why it's effing annoying that all you have to do is donate to the site and you're apparently untouchable.


Not quite. Hippy has donated (even if it was just for the PPT) and has had people buy USS for his account but he got banned by mistake.

I guess it depends on the cycle of the blue moon... :smt021


Like you said it, Hippy got banned by mistake.
There is a reason why certain feeders werent banned at all though, NO MISTAKES WERE MADE. :smt081
Either way...If I were to put my cash on anyone winning this era it would be IceBOLT.

Re: Is "Slave-Trading" the new "Feeding"??

Posted: Thu Jan 05, 2012 5:06 am
by torak
Beware there are a few people hiding low in ranks with some pretty impressive stats, army and techs

Re: Is "Slave-Trading" the new "Feeding"??

Posted: Thu Jan 05, 2012 9:14 am
by Jimbo 5.3
torak wrote:Beware there are a few people hiding low in ranks with some pretty impressive stats, army and techs


But have they been feeding to acquire those stats, armies, and techs?

Re: Is "Slave-Trading" the new "Feeding"??

Posted: Thu Jan 05, 2012 12:54 pm
by torak
Nope smart play. Just never built stats. to move up the ranks

Re: Is "Slave-Trading" the new "Feeding"??

Posted: Thu Jan 05, 2012 2:57 pm
by Scenester
torak wrote:Nope smart play. Just never built stats. to move up the ranks


And you just noticed this now?
The very first sentence I posted in the new era thread was something in the line of that the one will win who dares to build the army for the longest time and thus receive the most cash before working on stats, however if they start to work on stats too late, they won't be able to catch up.

However no one with a huge UP has benefited from that until recently, since you can have the biggest UP, but if you don;t use all your turns and have a **Filtered** army all the time you won't get more money then the rest resulting in no benefits from the UP at all whatsoever.

Finally people are building armies though...

IceBOLT has been doing it since he got owned after the feeds,
Elgcaress has been doing it from the start. (but didnt build an army untill recently)
Though I fear it won't benefit Elgcaress much since I believe Legend has some unfinished bussiness with her :smt102

Re: Is "Slave-Trading" the new "Feeding"??

Posted: Fri Jan 06, 2012 4:29 pm
by ™THE_LEGEND™
Scenester wrote:Elgcaress has been doing it from the start. (but didnt build an army untill recently)
Though I fear it won't benefit Elgcaress much since I believe Legend has some unfinished bussiness with her :smt102


Nah I deserved to get destroyed last era for snipping her while she was farming, maybe to not that extent.... But she was just making sure her alliance and her alliance leader (HippyFool) got 1st, because I would have won it [-( but O well, water under the bridge 8)

However I do have some people in my list of to-do's this era, but I will wait untill the final days, as massing now will do nothing but slow them down :smt019

Re: Is "Slave-Trading" the new "Feeding"??

Posted: Thu Jan 12, 2012 3:07 am
by ElgCaress
™THE_LEGEND™ wrote:
Scenester wrote:Elgcaress has been doing it from the start. (but didnt build an army untill recently)
Though I fear it won't benefit Elgcaress much since I believe Legend has some unfinished bussiness with her :smt102


Nah I deserved to get destroyed last era for snipping her while she was farming, maybe to not that extent.... But she was just making sure her alliance and her alliance leader (HippyFool) got 1st, because I would have won it [-( but O well, water under the bridge 8)

However I do have some people in my list of to-do's this era, but I will wait untill the final days, as massing now will do nothing but slow them down :smt019


Nah, in the past if someone sniped me i just either let it go or hit back and make sure they loose a decent amount of Naq in weapons to ensure they think twice before sniping me again.

The reason why i overreacted was because my brother passed away and emotions were all over the place. I got massed twice in that period (that Thursday when he went to hospital and then again that Monday when he died). I eventually got back to playing Q again and guess it was just bad timing that Legend picked that time to snipe me.

ps: I don't believe in just destroying someone's account cause i want my friend and/or alliance member to win. If you ranked 1 and u did it honestly then you deserve to win, regardless if you friend or foe. Legend and i have been at peace with each other since beginning of this era...though from 'that unfinished business' comment it might not last :razz:

Re: Is "Slave-Trading" the new "Feeding"??

Posted: Thu Jan 12, 2012 4:33 am
by Quina Quen
Sorry for your loss Elg.