StarGateWars Forums

Posted: **Sun Jan 06, 2008 9:23 am**

ThunderCat wrote:I would like to point out that Eros won the poll in the nomination topic by a landslide (I think like 40 to 3 from the nearest competitor or something like that). I also notice that a lot of the people who have been complaining in the many topics that have been opened did not vote in that topic where people were voting for ombudsman. I think the name mojo rising, Auriel, and Ancient Anubis stand out as not having voted. If you didn't vote for anyone in the ombudsman topics, or if you voted for eros, don't complain about the job he did as ombudsman.

Hmm, well there are a few thoughts on that - perhaps you should read the other topics.

Secondly, the insult thing with Spacey about calling Eros a woman was an dumb argument. Eros shouldn't have made a big deal about it. The "choose your words carefully" also was a misunderstanding. What Spacey should have said was "please don't insult people in the mod section" and it would not have seemed like an insult.

Yes, it was dumb.

Third, obviously the mods shouldn't remove someone that had been in his job for 24 hours. How do you know how good he'll be if he isn't even given a chance to prove himself. It also disturbs me to think that the mods would remove him without even consulting the community. But if this forum is a monarchy, then maybe we should make a new forum where the mods are elected by the community and not chosen by Forum.

Remember, the mods do not have the power to remove anyone, nor did they. The problem arose because Eros refused to work within the bounds of the ombudsman - instead he insisted on telling the mods what they should be doing and making statements like 'I'll set new rules and clear house if necessary' - which was way beyond his remit, and capability. Also remember that the ombudsman must be able to work with BOTH the community and the mods and be able to a) listen to other people, and b) acknowledge when they are in the wrong. Eros didn't listen to what anyone was telling him, and refuses to admit he is in the wrong ref Spacey calling him a woman, despite the fact that the vast majority of people are telling him he is wrong or misunderstood.

Fourth, I don't see why anyone should complain about Eros massing people who unjustly threw him out of his position after 24 hours because they realized that he might be an ombudsman who would make them accountable to the forum. Did anyone notice that during the times when we have a good ombudsman no mods get massed, but as soon as there was a transition where there was no ombudsman a mod got massed. Then when you threw out the ombudsman a whole bunch of mods and replaced him with someone you chose a massing is calling upon all of you. And I would like to add that I was never one of Eros's friends, I never knew him ingame, and everything i know about him is by reputation only. So nobody accuse me of being biased in his favor. Also, I have not read through the 50+ pages of spam and insults that this has caused so I may be lacking on information in some parts of this post.

As I said above, the problem was he wasn't working within the bounds of the ombudsman position. He didn't even bring any user concerns to the mods, all he did was create issues and bad feeling (not just with teh mods - and outside of his remit) where none previously existed. And I have to point out again - it IS NOT solely the choice of the forum users who becomes ombudsman - it is teh choice of both the community AND the mods. We didn't have to choose Eros, we could have chose any of the top 3 or 4 nominees.

Posted: **Sun Jan 06, 2008 9:52 am**

As I said above, the problem was he wasn't working within the bounds of the ombudsman position. He didn't even bring any user concerns to the mods, all he did was create issues and bad feeling (not just with teh mods - and outside of his remit) where none previously existed. And I have to point out again - it IS NOT solely the choice of the forum users who becomes ombudsman - it is teh choice of both the community AND the mods. We didn't have to choose Eros, we could have chose any of the top 3 or 4 nominees.

How do you expect me to bring user concerns when I just become ombudsman and the people don't even get a chance to voice their concerns before I get kicked? You cannot say I havent when you guys kick me out before I can. Its like I get in a car and someone pulls me out and hijacks it. Then the hijacker says you didn't drive to work that day.. what kind of employee are you? :lol:

Wolf you should really think before you speak.

Posted: **Sun Jan 06, 2008 9:56 am**

ThunderCat wrote:The poll was not a poll like the ones that were later set up, and if you're saying that:

REK
loCe
Tekki
thorslittleworld
MajorLeeHurts
_Stu_
Tanith
HippyFool
Tetrismonkey
TokKo
Itachi
Ancient Apophis
Baron Blackheart
WeaponZero
gridlock
God shornaal
[BERSERKER]
Comador
chucknorris101
FreeSpirit
killtacular
Tallon
The_Lurker
little chaka
Dread Zer0
[SGC_ReplicÅtors]
Phlaminghoe
generaloneill
danielv
Dark Bahamut
InfamouS
Blackburn
badnews
Wirewraith
[DDE] JediMasterX
Severian
Robe

Are all Eros's forum multies, then you can go right on thinking that.

I'm actually a multi of Spacey, like all the spammers.

Posted: **Sun Jan 06, 2008 10:05 am**

Phlaminghoe wrote:
ThunderCat wrote:The poll was not a poll like the ones that were later set up, and if you're saying that:

REK
loCe
Tekki
thorslittleworld
MajorLeeHurts
_Stu_
Tanith
HippyFool
Tetrismonkey
TokKo
Itachi
Ancient Apophis
Baron Blackheart
WeaponZero
gridlock
God shornaal
[BERSERKER]
Comador
chucknorris101
FreeSpirit
killtacular
Tallon
The_Lurker
little chaka
Dread Zer0
[SGC_ReplicÅtors]
Phlaminghoe
generaloneill
danielv
Dark Bahamut
InfamouS
Blackburn
badnews
Wirewraith
[DDE] JediMasterX
Severian
Robe

Are all Eros's forum multies, then you can go right on thinking that.

I'm actually a multi of Spacey, like all the spammers.

Posted: **Sun Jan 06, 2008 10:08 am**

How do you expect me to bring user concerns when I just become ombudsman and the people don't even get a chance to voice their concerns before I get kicked? You cannot say I havent when you guys kick me out before I can. Its like I get in a car and someone pulls me out and hijacks it. Then the hijacker says you didn't drive to work that day.. what kind of employee are you? Wolf you should really think before you speak.

We just keep going around in circles don't we. We've covered this at least twice now, in other threads, I have personally called you on it and got no response - and the upshot has been, and continues to be:

You are claiming community support where there was none, and is none. With 70% in the opinion thread against you, the mod poll conclusively against you... you are simply making claims that aren't true.
It is starting to grate on me, that your only answer to the communities' constant flow of reason is to either scream "propaganda" or to continue spewing arguments that were refuted thrice over in past threads.

For those of you who are interested in posting, read the threads involved - with them as context, most every sentence Ero's utters is a delusion.

Sometimes a very funny one.

Ero'Sore wrote:I have been advised by one of my friends that this all could have been a setup by the mods to get rid of me. Possible plotters include Psi and Spacey. They decided to make spacey make one witty remark, a remark that they knew wouldnt offended most, but me, and try to get me to call him out on it, only to immediatly kick me out. I fell for it, but I have no regrets.

Posted: **Sun Jan 06, 2008 10:37 am**

Ero`Sore wrote:
As I said above, the problem was he wasn't working within the bounds of the ombudsman position. He didn't even bring any user concerns to the mods, all he did was create issues and bad feeling (not just with teh mods - and outside of his remit) where none previously existed. And I have to point out again - it IS NOT solely the choice of the forum users who becomes ombudsman - it is teh choice of both the community AND the mods. We didn't have to choose Eros, we could have chose any of the top 3 or 4 nominees.

How do you expect me to bring user concerns when I just become ombudsman and the people don't even get a chance to voice their concerns before I get kicked? You cannot say I havent when you guys kick me out before I can. Its like I get in a car and someone pulls me out and hijacks it. Then the hijacker says you didn't drive to work that day.. what kind of employee are you? Wolf you should really think before you speak.

And you should really read AND think before you reply. As I told you via pm - The point of stating you had not brought any user concerns to us in the post was to emphasise that you had caused all of this trouble, outside of the remit of the ombudsman's position - i.e. you had no authority to do the things you did (and some were done through ignorance because you never understood what you were arguing against) and you caused a storm in a tea-cup by insiting that you had been called a woman, despite Spacey's assurance that he didn't and despite everyone else (not just mods) telling you the same. Even by your own admission in one of your posts 'most normal people would not be offended by it' goes to prove how ludicrous it was.

I'm thinking of starting up a fund to buy you a new spade!

Posted: **Sun Jan 06, 2008 11:48 am**

The Xeno wrote:
How do you expect me to bring user concerns when I just become ombudsman and the people don't even get a chance to voice their concerns before I get kicked? You cannot say I havent when you guys kick me out before I can. Its like I get in a car and someone pulls me out and hijacks it. Then the hijacker says you didn't drive to work that day.. what kind of employee are you? Wolf you should really think before you speak.

We just keep going around in circles don't we. We've covered this at least twice now, in other threads, I have personally called you on it and got no response - and the upshot has been, and continues to be:

You are claiming community support where there was none, and is none. With 70% in the opinion thread against you, the mod poll conclusively against you... you are simply making claims that aren't true.
It is starting to grate on me, that your only answer to the communities' constant flow of reason is to either scream "propaganda" or to continue spewing arguments that were refuted thrice over in past threads.

For those of you who are interested in posting, read the threads involved - with them as context, most every sentence Ero's utters is a delusion.

Sometimes a very funny one.
Ero'Sore wrote:I have been advised by one of my friends that this all could have been a setup by the mods to get rid of me. Possible plotters include Psi and Spacey. They decided to make spacey make one witty remark, a remark that they knew wouldnt offended most, but me, and try to get me to call him out on it, only to immediatly kick me out. I fell for it, but I have no regrets.

You guys love to see things that arent there don't you?
The poll was not against me or against spacey. It was me asking the community if he called me a woman or if I was seeing things. I was immediatly kicked out after making that poll (which was my way to resolve the controversy). The people never even really had a chance to answer it, I was already gone an hour after I made it. Which by the way was in the favor that Spacey DID call me a woman then. It now says he didn't, but because 20 some people think he did, it can be agreed that his remark was controversial and could be interpreted both ways.
Will you seriously use something new against me already? I've answered this remark atleast 3 times by now...

Posted: **Sun Jan 06, 2008 11:55 am**

Wolf359 wrote:
Ero`Sore wrote:
As I said above, the problem was he wasn't working within the bounds of the ombudsman position. He didn't even bring any user concerns to the mods, all he did was create issues and bad feeling (not just with teh mods - and outside of his remit) where none previously existed. And I have to point out again - it IS NOT solely the choice of the forum users who becomes ombudsman - it is teh choice of both the community AND the mods. We didn't have to choose Eros, we could have chose any of the top 3 or 4 nominees.

How do you expect me to bring user concerns when I just become ombudsman and the people don't even get a chance to voice their concerns before I get kicked? You cannot say I havent when you guys kick me out before I can. Its like I get in a car and someone pulls me out and hijacks it. Then the hijacker says you didn't drive to work that day.. what kind of employee are you? Wolf you should really think before you speak.

And you should really read AND think before you reply. As I told you via pm - The point of stating you had not brought any user concerns to us in the post was to emphasise that you had caused all of this trouble, outside of the remit of the ombudsman's position - i.e. you had no authority to do the things you did (and some were done through ignorance because you never understood what you were arguing against) and you caused a storm in a tea-cup by insiting that you had been called a woman, despite Spacey's assurance that he didn't and despite everyone else (not just mods) telling you the same. Even by your own admission in one of your posts 'most normal people would not be offended by it' goes to prove how ludicrous it was.

I'm thinking of starting up a fund to buy you a new spade!

Could you please tell me what "all of the trouble I caused was"?
All I did was ask people if Spacey called me a woman or not... Then you guys kicked me... Sure I've caused trouble AFTER I got kicked, but I'm not going to lay over and play dead after being thrown away to the dogs.

Posted: **Sun Jan 06, 2008 12:07 pm**

Eros, Eros, Eros... oh dear!It was moved to a still FULLY public place after it had been up for an hour and 10 minutes in SGW General - where it did not belong! There was also a shadow topic left in SGW General - so it wasn't 'removed' as you claim.And you cannot quibble with the undeniable fact that this poll (along with the others you made) DID NOT go in your favour.Like I said before, quit it with the broken record and come up with something of some actual substance.

Ero`sore wrote:Could you please tell me what "all of the trouble I caused was"?
All I did was ask people if Spacey called me a woman or not... Then you guys kicked me... Sure I've caused trouble AFTER I got kicked, but I'm not going to lay over and play dead after being thrown away to the dogs.

1. You caused an argument in the Honor Committee section over something you did not understand, despite the fact that people were trying to tell you you were mistaken, you kept on and on about it.

2. Going around saying you were making rules for the mods - outside your remit.

3. Insisting, depsite Spacey's assurance, and others, including non-mods that he called you a woman - and then making an issue out of it - later, claiming it was an official ombudsman thread (when quite clearly it wasn't), after it was moved!

4. 'Warning' the mod moving your poll because it was 'an official ombudsman thread' - despite the fact it didn't belong in SGW General and despite the fact that it was not in your red 'official' text. Additionally, you had previously contacted that mod (me) to complain about moving the thread. I told you that even if I wanted to move it (which I didn't) I couldn't, because I could not (at the time) mod that section, therefore I couldn't move it. Following that, you sent a 'warning' - which again, you had no remit to do.

Additionally, you weren't immediately fired following your poll, nor was it the only reason, nor were the reasons purely mod related.

So in summary, in your short stint in time you did nothing but fail in your attempts to undermine the mods (via your various polls), fail in your attempts to look good, and did nothing but turn the very people you were supposed to be working with (and by that I mean mods and teh community) against you.

Okay - I've answered your question, so how about you tell me a bit more about this propoganda we're using against you? What have any of the mods said that is unjust and trying to make you look bad?

Calling you out on this for - mmmmmm - possibly the 4th time now.

(And the fund for the spade is up to £0.10).

Posted: **Sun Jan 06, 2008 12:52 pm**

Ero'Sore wrote:You guys love to see things that arent there don't you?

If we are - it's due to having such an excellent example... thank you sensai Ero'Sore.

I'm sure Psi will contact me with the latest plot to undercut the community within the hour.

:roll:

Ero'Sore wrote:I was immediatly kicked out after making that poll (which was my way to resolve the controversy). The people never even really had a chance to answer it, I was already gone an hour after I made it.

As I and others have made clear in the GalCol thread, the mod poll thread, the ombudsman poll thread, the woman poll thread, and this thread - what you are claiming is absurd.
The poll thread is here, for those of you who are interested.
viewtopic.php?f=10&t=100913&st=0&sk=t&sd=a

The 'people' had the time to vote, and the time to post. Those that posted made it very clear that you were completely off base - at best you were being petty, at worst acting like a spoiled child.
Further, your numbers are also off base - read the thread, count the number of people for you, and against you at the time of your firing - the community was telling you to stop... and you didn't listen.

You still aren't.

Ero'Sore wrote:Will you seriously use something new against me already? I've answered this remark atleast 3 times by now...

That is our line.

You created one thread, the community didn't support you in it.
Smooshable created this thread - you don't have support.
You created a new thread, the community didn't support you in it.
You created a fourth thread, the community isn't supporting you in it.
Psi-Kiya-Trist created a thread - and again, you didn't have any support.

You keep rehashing the same things each time, and each time it becomes even more clear why the decision to fire you was the correct one. If we are reusing an argument, it is because you have no counter - except to make a new thread, ignore it, call it propaganda, or claim to have answered it when you haven't.

At this point, there is no longer a 'debate'. You have labeled everything we say propaganda - accused our mods of all manner of absurdity - done all kinds of illogical loops in a vain attempt to make petty+ego=ombudsman - and on the whole, you've only succeeded in embarrassing yourself for those who have actually read what you've written.

-------------

Having no rational success, because your position isn't reasonable, all your doing now is buying an account to mass the people to whom you made a fool of yourself.
Bravo.
As I've said, my pixels have dug their graves - bring the barrage.

Posted: **Sun Jan 06, 2008 1:08 pm**

Wolf359 wrote:Eros, Eros, Eros... oh dear!It was moved to a still FULLY public place after it had been up for an hour and 10 minutes in SGW General - where it did not belong! There was also a shadow topic left in SGW General - so it wasn't 'removed' as you claim.And you cannot quibble with the undeniable fact that this poll (along with the others you made) DID NOT go in your favour.Like I said before, quit it with the broken record and come up with something of some actual substance.

Ero`sore wrote:Could you please tell me what "all of the trouble I caused was"?
All I did was ask people if Spacey called me a woman or not... Then you guys kicked me... Sure I've caused trouble AFTER I got kicked, but I'm not going to lay over and play dead after being thrown away to the dogs.

1. You caused an argument in the Honor Committee section over something you did not understand, despite the fact that people were trying to tell you you were mistaken, you kept on and on about it.

2. Going around saying you were making rules for the mods - outside your remit.

3. Insisting, depsite Spacey's assurance, and others, including non-mods that he called you a woman - and then making an issue out of it - later, claiming it was an official ombudsman thread (when quite clearly it wasn't), after it was moved!

4. 'Warning' the mod moving your poll because it was 'an official ombudsman thread' - despite the fact it didn't belong in SGW General and despite the fact that it was not in your red 'official' text. Additionally, you had previously contacted that mod (me) to complain about moving the thread. I told you that even if I wanted to move it (which I didn't) I couldn't, because I could not (at the time) mod that section, therefore I couldn't move it. Following that, you sent a 'warning' - which again, you had no remit to do.

Additionally, you weren't immediately fired following your poll, nor was it the only reason, nor were the reasons purely mod related.

So in summary, in your short stint in time you did nothing but fail in your attempts to undermine the mods (via your various polls), fail in your attempts to look good, and did nothing but turn the very people you were supposed to be working with (and by that I mean mods and teh community) against you.

Okay - I've answered your question, so how about you tell me a bit more about this propoganda we're using against you? What have any of the mods said that is unjust and trying to make you look bad?

Calling you out on this for - mmmmmm - possibly the 4th time now.

(And the fund for the spade is up to £0.10).

#1 I made a constructive suggestion the Respect thread and after I found out it offended people I appologized. I have asked several moderators several times to make it public but they refuse to. Even though I was the author of the thread, posted it in the wrong place (since the respect group didnt want me to post there), and now I can no longer see it.

#2 Ofcourse I was. Look how bad things went without the rules. So it appears we find another reason why you the mods kicked me. You were afraid you would actually have some rules to follow.

#3 Ofcourse I made an issue of another man calling me a woman. I called him out on it, he refused to recognize that his statement could have been interpreted differently. I polled the community and even though most said he didnt, a very high number of people did, thus comming to the conclusion that I wasn't "crazy" to think he called me a woman and others believed the same. It was not a support me or spacey thread, it was a simple question I wanted answered.

#4 Ofcourse I warned you for doing something wrong. I would have warned every mod who broke a rule or did something to protect another person from justice.

#5 I polled the community to see if how they feel about the moderators. Since it's about the moderators, the moderators DO NOT HAVE A SAY in the poll, so I discounted all their votes (20 mods, 20 votes). The community is in agreement that you aren't doing a very good job.

#6 You have said the same thing over and over again, and I have replied with the same answers over and over again.
If you don't have something new, quit waisting my time and the readers times.

#7 Fact of the matter is I do have support. Just because you the mods think you are everyone who matters, I actually do i many "people who don't matter" behind me. You will see a few when we mass you, but you will see many at the admin meeting. We are not against all the mods, just mods in general as everybody behind me has an issue with atleast one moderator.

P.S from now on if you repeat another one of your "very original" statements/questions, I will simply quote this exact post as it has answered everything so far.

Posted: **Sun Jan 06, 2008 1:36 pm**

Ero`Sore wrote: The people never even really had a chance to answer it, I was already gone an hour after I made it. Which by the way was in the favor that Spacey DID call me a woman then. It now says he didn't, but because 20 some people think he did, it can be agreed that his remark was controversial and could be interpreted both ways...

I've said in another area that I would stay out of this thing, and right now, I probably really should, but last night I though of a new way to try to show something. I don't think you'll really get what I am saying, but I'll try -one last time- for you and others who could be reading this...

Ero`Sore wrote:...

1) Do not publicly argue if you have a problem with a moderator. Contact Ero`Sore.
2) All the old rules we had

Spacey wrote:
Ero`Sore wrote:
1) Do not publicly argue if you have a problem with a moderator. Contact your ombudsman/woman.

Better, I think.

Eros, what we see is what you said, and what I said after. I took out the part you were talking about FS' suggestions to reduce confusion.

If I had said:

Code: Select all

1) Do not publicly argue if you have a problem with a moderator. Contact Ero`Sore: your ombudsman/woman

then it would be widely accepted that I had called you a woman. BUT, I took you name out completely... I said

Code: Select all

1) Do not publicly argue if you have a problem with a moderator. Contact your ombudsman/woman.

Eros, your name isn't in there. I removed your name and stated it generically. Yes, you were the current ombudsperson, but I wasn't speaking to how things are now. It was a general statement (what I wrote). If your name was there (in what I wrote) it would be that I was speaking to the person, but I removed your name, and in so was speaking to the position.

You wanted to poll the community to see who was at fault, to seewhat the community said

[spoiler]1/3/2008 6:25:51 PM K - Spacey Ombudsman (6) Ero`Sore (6) Ombudsman the slash seperates man from woman
1/3/2008 6:25:54 PM Ombudsman (6) Ero`Sore (6) Ombudsman K - Spacey u wanna ask the community if they agree with me?
1/3/2008 6:26:01 PM K - Spacey Ombudsman (6) Ero`Sore (6) Ombudsman you can if you want to
1/3/2008 6:26:03 PM Ombudsman (6) Ero`Sore (6) Ombudsman K - Spacey that u called me a woman
1/3/2008 6:26:17 PM K - Spacey Ombudsman (6) Ero`Sore (6) Ombudsman if that's what you want to do, then do it
1/3/2008 6:26:28 PM Ombudsman (6) Ero`Sore (6) Ombudsman K - Spacey i already believe u did
1/3/2008 6:26:42 PM Ombudsman (6) Ero`Sore (6) Ombudsman K - Spacey if u want to disprove it then the community is your only way
1/3/2008 6:27:29 PM K - Spacey Ombudsman (6) Ero`Sore (6) Ombudsman no, I don't think so if you want to ask the community what they think include the whole thread and ask about that part
1/3/2008 6:27:39 PM K - Spacey Ombudsman (6) Ero`Sore (6) Ombudsman give them the whole picture and ask them about it
...
1/3/2008 6:37:49 PM K - Spacey Ombudsman (6) Ero`Sore (6) Ombudsman what I first posted covered the position not the person
1/3/2008 6:38:07 PM Ombudsman (6) Ero`Sore (6) Ombudsman K - Spacey i INTERPRETED it that you covered the person
1/3/2008 6:38:07 PM K - Spacey Ombudsman (6) Ero`Sore (6) Ombudsman you responded to that I I described what I meant
1/3/2008 6:38:13 PM Ombudsman (6) Ero`Sore (6) Ombudsman K - Spacey and its my opinion
1/3/2008 6:38:19 PM Ombudsman (6) Ero`Sore (6) Ombudsman K - Spacey yours might be different i dont care
1/3/2008 6:38:31 PM Ombudsman (6) Ero`Sore (6) Ombudsman K - Spacey but im sure that if we poll the community, most will see it like i did
1/3/2008 6:38:42 PM K - Spacey Ombudsman (6) Ero`Sore (6) Ombudsman then ask the community
1/3/2008 6:38:57 PM K - Spacey Ombudsman (6) Ero`Sore (6) Ombudsman give them the thread
1/3/2008 6:39:00 PM K - Spacey Ombudsman (6) Ero`Sore (6) Ombudsman the entire thread
1/3/2008 6:39:06 PM K - Spacey Ombudsman (6) Ero`Sore (6) Ombudsman and ask them what they think
...
1/3/2008 6:43:16 PM K - Spacey Ombudsman (6) Ero`Sore (6) Ombudsman please do make a thread about this asking the community
1/3/2008 6:43:29 PM K - Spacey Ombudsman (6) Ero`Sore (6) Ombudsman or at least ask the mods
1/3/2008 6:43:33 PM K - Spacey Ombudsman (6) Ero`Sore (6) Ombudsman or something
1/3/2008 6:43:36 PM Ombudsman (6) Ero`Sore (6) Ombudsman K - Spacey i am now
1/3/2008 6:43:43 PM K - Spacey Ombudsman (6) Ero`Sore (6) Ombudsman we're not getting anywhere with this
1/3/2008 6:43:51 PM K - Spacey Ombudsman (6) Ero`Sore (6) Ombudsman include the whole thread
1/3/2008 6:44:01 PM K - Spacey Ombudsman (6) Ero`Sore (6) Ombudsman give them the entire picture please
1/3/2008 6:44:06 PM K - Spacey Ombudsman (6) Ero`Sore (6) Ombudsman not segments
1/3/2008 6:44:19 PM Ombudsman (6) Ero`Sore (6) Ombudsman K - Spacey i am going to post EXACLY what i saw at 2:20
1/3/2008 6:44:26 PM Ombudsman (6) Ero`Sore (6) Ombudsman K - Spacey the exact time i got offended at
1/3/2008 6:44:39 PM Ombudsman (6) Ero`Sore (6) Ombudsman K - Spacey there were no explanations then
1/3/2008 6:45:00 PM K - Spacey Ombudsman (6) Ero`Sore (6) Ombudsman I think this can be solved without going to the community, but you don't want to have a mediator
1/3/2008 6:45:35 PM Ombudsman (6) Ero`Sore (6) Ombudsman K - Spacey u said u want it to go to the community
1/3/2008 6:45:40 PM Ombudsman (6) Ero`Sore (6) Ombudsman K - Spacey so the community will be our mediator
1/3/2008 6:46:06 PM K - Spacey Ombudsman (6) Ero`Sore (6) Ombudsman I said that as a final option
1/3/2008 6:46:12 PM K - Spacey Ombudsman (6) Ero`Sore (6) Ombudsman in this msn convo
1/3/2008 6:46:17 PM K - Spacey Ombudsman (6) Ero`Sore (6) Ombudsman i suggested a mediator first
1/3/2008 6:46:24 PM K - Spacey Ombudsman (6) Ero`Sore (6) Ombudsman you said no
1/3/2008 6:46:35 PM K - Spacey Ombudsman (6) Ero`Sore (6) Ombudsman you only suggested asking the community
1/3/2008 6:46:42 PM K - Spacey Ombudsman (6) Ero`Sore (6) Ombudsman if that is what you want, then do it
1/3/2008 6:46:47 PM K - Spacey Ombudsman (6) Ero`Sore (6) Ombudsman that is what I am saying
1/3/2008 6:46:57 PM K - Spacey Ombudsman (6) Ero`Sore (6) Ombudsman becasue we are not getting anywhere on this
1/3/2008 6:47:14 PM Ombudsman (6) Ero`Sore (6) Ombudsman K - Spacey you never said final option
1/3/2008 6:47:41 PM Ombudsman (6) Ero`Sore (6) Ombudsman K - Spacey http://img229.imageshack.us/img229/522/spaceyyz0.png
1/3/2008 6:47:46 PM K - Spacey Ombudsman (6) Ero`Sore (6) Ombudsman I didn't but you don't like my other idea, I am comprimising with you
...
1/3/2008 7:01:00 PM Ombudsman (6) Ero`Sore (6) Ombudsman K - Spacey your faith is now in the hands of the community
...
1/3/2008 7:04:01 PM K - Spacey Ombudsman (6) Ero`Sore (6) Ombudsman shall we wait on the community verdict to continue conversation? or continue now? keep in mind I missed lunch, running around in some meetings and such
1/3/2008 7:04:14 PM K - Spacey Ombudsman (6) Ero`Sore (6) Ombudsman and didn;t have dinner yet either
1/3/2008 7:04:21 PM K - Spacey Ombudsman (6) Ero`Sore (6) Ombudsman 7:04 now for me
1/3/2008 7:04:39 PM Ombudsman (6) Ero`Sore (6) Ombudsman K - Spacey yes
...
1/3/2008 7:05:06 PM K - Spacey Ombudsman (6) Ero`Sore (6) Ombudsman yes we wait, or yes we continue now?
...
1/3/2008 7:05:38 PM Ombudsman (6) Ero`Sore (6) Ombudsman K - Spacey yes we wait[/spoiler]

and the community didn't agree. I realized a couple of days ago that there was no way you would have seen this as to what the majority says. If the majority of people said that yes I did call you a woman, you would have used that number and said I was wrong. I would have agreed too. However, now, as the majority doesn't agree the argument is that even though that is the case a minority still sees it as offensive and make it controversial. Even if 100% said they did not think I was calling you a woman, the argument would have then been it was who you interpreted it, and I was still wrong.

From what smoosh said here about removing you, that was one part of it. In light of mass agreement that it wasn't anything offensive this still continues. You weren't removed for making a poll, or for having an opinion that was not in agreement with me or other vocal moderators.

I've said elsewhere that I'd stay out of this now, and I'll do just that. I will pm Jack about this (user mod ongoing dispute), and put him to work in his first 24 hours.

I wish you well Eros.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cnUpaUHi1BQ
(I Wish You Well - Tom Cochrane)

Kevin

p.s. insulting members in the subforum is not constructive, but that's my opinion, thankfully one that members share (read the second spoiler). You did suggest to clean house, but that is done periodically anyway.

Posted: **Sun Jan 06, 2008 1:46 pm**

Phlaminghoe wrote:
ThunderCat wrote:The poll was not a poll like the ones that were later set up, and if you're saying that:

REK
loCe
Tekki
thorslittleworld
MajorLeeHurts
_Stu_
Tanith
HippyFool
Tetrismonkey
TokKo
Itachi
Ancient Apophis
Baron Blackheart
WeaponZero
gridlock
God shornaal
[BERSERKER]
Comador
chucknorris101
FreeSpirit
killtacular
Tallon
The_Lurker
little chaka
Dread Zer0
[SGC_ReplicÅtors]
Phlaminghoe
generaloneill
danielv
Dark Bahamut
InfamouS
Blackburn
badnews
Wirewraith
[DDE] JediMasterX
Severian
Robe

Are all Eros's forum multies, then you can go right on thinking that.

I'm actually a multi of Spacey, like all the spammers.

The conspiracy deepens!

Edit- Remember spacey, it was me, not soulless

Posted: **Sun Jan 06, 2008 3:18 pm**

sorry, but 20 is the wrong number to subtract...

as the total mod count is 23, and we have a list here of 5 have to be subtracted...

01 WhiteyDude 1 Last visited: Wed Dec 19, 2007 11:17
10 S1eepy 1 Last visited: Sun Dec 16, 2007 19:27
12 Suggestive Disorder 1 not active at all... that mod only reads chaos section, DID NOT VOTE
14 General Mod 3 1 Last visited: Sat Nov 17, 2007 23:13
22 Zeratul 1 DID NOT VOTE

plus, you also need to consider that the chat mods (homer and eriond), probably dont care that much about this... so they could probably also be discounted... with only the 5 on list above are removed, the total of your "20" is 18, with homer/eriond subtracted, it is 16... and there are probably several other mods that did not vote...

anyways, we do not plan to post anything more here...

Posted: **Sun Jan 06, 2008 3:20 pm**

Do you also want to count the moderator multi accounts? Like the global mods and such? When's the last time they logged in? Cause I'm sure some have logged in them to vote twice. If the number doesn't exceed 20 then I'll change it, but I'm pretty sure it will and I'll still keep it at 20.

StarGateWars Forums

Eros - Removed as Ombudsman

Re: Eros - Removed as Ombudsman

Re: Eros - Removed as Ombudsman

Re: Eros - Removed as Ombudsman

Re: Eros - Removed as Ombudsman

Re: Eros - Removed as Ombudsman

Re: Eros - Removed as Ombudsman

Re: Eros - Removed as Ombudsman

Re: Eros - Removed as Ombudsman

Re: Eros - Removed as Ombudsman

Re: Eros - Removed as Ombudsman

Re: Eros - Removed as Ombudsman

Re: Eros - Removed as Ombudsman

Re: Eros - Removed as Ombudsman

Re: Eros - Removed as Ombudsman

Re: Eros - Removed as Ombudsman