Page 12 of 18

Re: TAF- Relearning the lessons of history..

Posted: Mon Mar 12, 2012 11:34 pm
by Neimenljivi
Lol you "infiltrated" the TA, when they let you and fed you with false info, and now you're proud because you got in?
[spoiler]Image[/spoiler]

Furthermore No is with OE, I can remember the time when me and like 10 other in TPP (ThePiratesPanties for those that don't remember, although I'm sure that OE remembers it quite well) fought the entire OE. What was it, 11 vs 100? Something like that? And you guys whined "meh there's 11 of you and 100 of us, of course you can do more damage, wah wah wah" yet none of you seemed to realize that there were 10x more of you than us, with that kind of combined resources gained PER TURN, you could easily have kept us down. Especially since almost none of us was buying any resources, unlike you. Yet we always came up and fought you more, destroying all defences that were built on your side. We beat you to such extent you kept asking us for end of the war and NAP and stuff like that all the time.
Now there's 5x as many TAF members as OE members, and now you cry that they have more players so it's only natural you're losing?

So to sum up, you're not ok with having 10x as many members in a war than opposing alliance because the opposing alliance has the upper hand, and you're not ok with having 5x less members than opposing alliance, because once again, the opposing alliance has the upper hand?

I guess it just shows that the opposing alliance will always have "unfair advantage".

And talk about bug abusing, LOL. Hey what about the time EtL built huge planets to have huge stats with no ground stats, it was all ok, but when Caspian did that to mass whole OE - OMG A CHEAT!!

Get a grip attention seekers.

~N

Re: TAF- Relearning the lessons of history..

Posted: Tue Mar 13, 2012 12:37 am
by mcdeadly
Neimenljivi wrote:Lol you "infiltrated" the TA, when they let you and fed you with false info, and now you're proud because you got in?
[spoiler]Image[/spoiler]

Furthermore No is with OE, I can remember the time when me and like 10 other in TPP (ThePiratesPanties for those that don't remember, although I'm sure that OE remembers it quite well) fought the entire OE. What was it, 11 vs 100? Something like that? And you guys whined "meh there's 11 of you and 100 of us, of course you can do more damage, wah wah wah" yet none of you seemed to realize that there were 10x more of you than us, with that kind of combined resources gained PER TURN, you could easily have kept us down. Especially since almost none of us was buying any resources, unlike you. Yet we always came up and fought you more, destroying all defences that were built on your side. We beat you to such extent you kept asking us for end of the war and NAP and stuff like that all the time.
Now there's 5x as many TAF members as OE members, and now you cry that they have more players so it's only natural you're losing?

So to sum up, you're not ok with having 10x as many members in a war than opposing alliance because the opposing alliance has the upper hand, and you're not ok with having 5x less members than opposing alliance, because once again, the opposing alliance has the upper hand?

I guess it just shows that the opposing alliance will always have "unfair advantage".

And talk about bug abusing, LOL. Hey what about the time EtL built huge planets to have huge stats with no ground stats, it was all ok, but when Caspian did that to mass whole OE - OMG A CHEAT!!

Get a grip attention seekers.

~N

Hmmm......
i musta missed something.
who is having a sook about being outnumbered, i thought that was hella old news. I know I dont care about it :D

Re: TAF- Relearning the lessons of history..

Posted: Tue Mar 13, 2012 12:50 am
by ~wolverine~
Neimenljivi wrote:[spoiler]Image[/spoiler]


you saw me? :P

Re: TAF- Relearning the lessons of history..

Posted: Tue Mar 13, 2012 2:24 am
by Lithium
Neimenljivi wrote:Lol you "infiltrated" the TA, when they let you and fed you with false info, and now you're proud because you got in?
[spoiler]Image[/spoiler]

Furthermore No is with OE, I can remember the time when me and like 10 other in TPP (ThePiratesPanties for those that don't remember, although I'm sure that OE remembers it quite well) fought the entire OE. What was it, 11 vs 100? Something like that? And you guys whined "meh there's 11 of you and 100 of us, of course you can do more damage, wah wah wah" yet none of you seemed to realize that there were 10x more of you than us, with that kind of combined resources gained PER TURN, you could easily have kept us down. Especially since almost none of us was buying any resources, unlike you. Yet we always came up and fought you more, destroying all defences that were built on your side. We beat you to such extent you kept asking us for end of the war and NAP and stuff like that all the time.
Now there's 5x as many TAF members as OE members, and now you cry that they have more players so it's only natural you're losing?

So to sum up, you're not ok with having 10x as many members in a war than opposing alliance because the opposing alliance has the upper hand, and you're not ok with having 5x less members than opposing alliance, because once again, the opposing alliance has the upper hand?

I guess it just shows that the opposing alliance will always have "unfair advantage".

And talk about bug abusing, LOL. Hey what about the time EtL built huge planets to have huge stats with no ground stats, it was all ok, but when Caspian did that to mass whole OE - OMG A CHEAT!!

Get a grip attention seekers.

~N


thats so sweet , Ayeeee they fell in pieces those days ;) but this time Mr. Kitty is alone wit a bunch of slaves. i wonder if he ever learned anything in all these years .

Re: TAF- Relearning the lessons of history..

Posted: Tue Mar 13, 2012 3:05 am
by mcdeadly
goot maths...... "alone with slaves" :smt081

Re: TAF- Relearning the lessons of history..

Posted: Tue Mar 13, 2012 3:27 am
by Huxley
Neimenljivi wrote:Lol you "infiltrated" the TA, when they let you and fed you with false info, and now you're proud because you got in?
[spoiler]Image[/spoiler]


What false info? You seem to be reading something that isn't there...

Neimenljivi wrote:Furthermore No is with OE, I can remember the time when me and like 10 other in TPP (ThePiratesPanties for those that don't remember, although I'm sure that OE remembers it quite well) fought the entire OE. What was it, 11 vs 100? Something like that? And you guys whined "meh there's 11 of you and 100 of us, of course you can do more damage, wah wah wah" yet none of you seemed to realize that there were 10x more of you than us, with that kind of combined resources gained PER TURN, you could easily have kept us down. Especially since almost none of us was buying any resources, unlike you. Now there's 5x as many TAF members as OE members, and now you cry that they have more players so it's only natural you're losing?


lmao, we didn't even bring up member count that was Mathlord.

Mathlord wrote:See? That's a rebuild. Adding one big account and having two people take over other accounts isn't a rebuild :smt043

Call me when Omega has 50 members again...I'll try to have my phone bill paid to accept that call by sometime next year ;)


Huxley wrote:
Mathlord wrote:See? That's a rebuild. Adding one big account and having two people take over other accounts isn't a rebuild :smt043

Call me when Omega has 50 members again...I'll try to have my phone bill paid to accept that call by sometime next year ;)


For your information numbers are nothing. I would rather be with 5 of my best Omegan brothers/sisters than a 100 headless chickens ;)

On that note, we would single handly whoop your empire in onliners (5 on 100), now lets play game Mathlord ;)



Neimenljivi wrote:So to sum up, you're not ok with having 10x as many members in a war than opposing alliance because the opposing alliance has the upper hand, and you're not ok with having 5x less members than opposing alliance, because once again, the opposing alliance has the upper hand?


Read above.

Neimenljivi wrote:Get a grip attention seekers.


Sup, jealous hater? :smt043

Re: TAF- Relearning the lessons of history..

Posted: Tue Mar 13, 2012 3:31 am
by ~wolverine~
Huxley wrote:Sup, jealous hater? :smt043


I think urururururur got a bit jealous so they raised there alliance power up

~Wolverine~ wrote:seems like urururururururuururrururururu is back on the rise

URURUR Alliance ururur(Snr) 91 18,881,252,999,397 69 (1,001)
α Allegiance LewTenAnt Disciples of Forseti (justice) 2,517,426,530 104 10,946,463,622,492 8 (200,001)

not that its relevant or anything, we better watch out, they are back on the rise


never underestimate urururururrur

Re: TAF- Relearning the lessons of history..

Posted: Tue Mar 13, 2012 3:36 am
by mcdeadly
~Wolverine~ wrote:
Huxley wrote:Sup, jealous hater? :smt043


I think urururururur got a bit jealous so they raised there alliance power up

~Wolverine~ wrote:seems like urururururururuururrururururu is back on the rise

URURUR Alliance ururur(Snr) 91 18,881,252,999,397 69 (1,001)
α Allegiance LewTenAnt Disciples of Forseti (justice) 2,517,426,530 104 10,946,463,622,492 8 (200,001)

not that its relevant or anything, we better watch out, they are back on the rise


never underestimate urururururrur


?

i need beers!

Re: TAF- Relearning the lessons of history..

Posted: Tue Mar 13, 2012 5:06 am
by Huxley
Just seen this post, this should be a laugh.

Mathlord wrote:I have always known far more than you would like to believe I know ETL ;)


Just like you knew I was looking for a cov 39 account in the public market when infact I wasn't at all?

Mathlord wrote:You want a war setting from me? Give me reason to give you one...


You'll get one in return, fair fight war/war onliner - isn't this what the game is trying to push for, more online battles to test skills, fairly sure I've seen you back it up but yet it can't apply here when you realise you would stand no chance against us, correct?

I guess you need to wait for the war setting, temp PPT and counter quickly, same ol' same ol'

Mathlord wrote:How about while we're at it we empty all of our banks and the only resources we have to fight are what we can farm or raid as opposed to what our credit cards can buy or what we can be given from other accounts...

I'd be hurt by it, but would I be hurt by it as much as all of you? I don't think so ;)


Oh dear, on every occasion you have been massed/attempted massed you drop rank to buy more UU with $ - You up your levels with spent $ (except the occasion your alliance banded together to help you) - Your ENTIRE account is dependent on $ - I have the proof of this mr spent 1500$ ALONE during THIS war ALONE, for what? a 38/38 crappy MS account, shows where all that $ went; can you say the same about ALL of ours?... Yes you've massed alot, but really you've funded it all with $ at the end of the day, which you laugh at us for spending $ yet you do the exact same.. this argument neither side can win so stop bringing it up and using your long novels to try convince everyone your right. [spoiler]FOR THE RECORD, I would 100% prefer to not have the backing of all this $ spending, but it's not going to happen is it?[/spoiler]

Yes one or two of our accounts are the same, but you don't see us starting the **Filtered** contest about $ spending again do you?

While we're on this topic, I would gladly give you a onliner now I'm fully built, like I said I would a while back. You ask, why should you onliner me? You talk the talk, can you walk the walk?

[spoiler]Back when I massed Mathlord using my farmed resources at the time, didn't have the $ backing to give him a onliner AT THE TIME:
Mathlord wrote:PS I congratulated you already Huxley and you read my post. You want an onliner? I'm ready for one...I was going to hit you back if you had given me another minute before going on PPT...
I'm ready too Mathlord.[/spoiler]

Re: TAF- Relearning the lessons of history..

Posted: Tue Mar 13, 2012 5:22 am
by SSG EnterTheLion
Neimenljivi wrote:
And talk about bug abusing, LOL. Hey what about the time EtL built huge planets to have huge stats with no ground stats, it was all ok, but when Caspian did that to mass whole OE - OMG A CHEAT!!

Get a grip attention seekers.

~N


You are a big one to talk! We pasted the PPs..only one who actually fought back was your leader.

Have you ever heard the term ignorance breeds contempt? Well then that's what I have for you. As anyone who knows me knows, I never build up planets, if I steal a good one, so be it, but I never waste naq on a planet. Infact I would say of all the major players I'm probably the one with the least amount of big planets through out my game time.

And as for caspain, a multi of JUAN's funded by JUAN's own account and Metal Messiah. Hypocricy on the parts of the guys who were collectively MM, as they used to **Filtered** so much about JUAN. So here's a piece of advise chump, learn your history properly before posting!

Re: TAF- Relearning the lessons of history..

Posted: Tue Mar 13, 2012 5:42 am
by Norbe
ETL - I have not had an answer regarding the ascended ID of huxley's account and how it is not linked to the correct main account. Can you please answer this?

Norbe wrote:I do have one question regarding the StrikeForce account, and I would appreciate it if Omega will take the time to answer this.

The ascended server ID is 4081. Main ID is 75007
But the ascended ID 4081 was originally linked to main account ID 5757.

How was it possible for the switch to be made within the rules of the game, as accounts can only legally be bought and sold as a pair (main+ascended)? And which ascended ID is linked to main account 5757 (which is still in active rankings, so must have an account) now?

By my reckoning, this is a breech of game rules in itself, which Omega performed prior to placing StrikeForce in TA.

~Norbe~

Re: TAF- Relearning the lessons of history..

Posted: Tue Mar 13, 2012 5:49 am
by Neimenljivi
SSG EnterTheLion wrote:
TAF- 100 odd members
OE- 20 odd..

hmm... I leave others to make the connections from your refusal.. :-"


Say what Huxley?
What other does misleading info mean than false info?
And no I am not jealous because I find someone who has the need to seek attention on the net a rather pathetic being, because it means that one is not getting enough attention elsewhere.

Really EtL? Hahahah you make me laugh xD
In fact, you might want to read the topics again: you can find the first war here: viewtopic.php?f=99&t=164887&hilit=TPP+vs+OE&start=60 (note read my post, those weren't small defences back then, they were the biggest among OE, but then again you can start re-reading from the beginning to freshen your memory) and viewtopic.php?f=99&t=170869&hilit=TPP+vs+OE this topic
I remember numerous chats in which you tried to negotiate peace with us, something you've never done before, not until your enemies came to you first anyway.

If you're calling me a liar and a big mouth and the one who never did any work, then why did you invite me to Omega in so many occasions? I also don't see how you were ignoring me or something like that, due to above mentioned fact lol xD

Oh right, I forgot, you were "just testing those planets" so you never spent any naq on them aside from the naq you were "assigned" to spend on them for "test purposes". Stop being a hypocrite.

Now stop living in the past and take a look around - OE is no more. I have hardly been around and even I know that lol. But then again, by the looks of it, you hardly were around too, seeing how great and mighty you think you are.

Also thumbs up for Noobert's post, you gained my respect mate :)

We did say Arr, lith :) Only natural they were falling so quickly hehe :D
Yeah he's trying to save his almost completely sunk ship. The only thing that's keeping it afloat are the slaves swimming under it.

~N

Re: TAF- Relearning the lessons of history..

Posted: Tue Mar 13, 2012 5:51 am
by SSG EnterTheLion
Norbe wrote:ETL - I have not had an answer regarding the ascended ID of huxley's account and how it is not linked to the correct main account. Can you please answer this?

Norbe wrote:I do have one question regarding the StrikeForce account, and I would appreciate it if Omega will take the time to answer this.

The ascended server ID is 4081. Main ID is 75007
But the ascended ID 4081 was originally linked to main account ID 5757.

How was it possible for the switch to be made within the rules of the game, as accounts can only legally be bought and sold as a pair (main+ascended)? And which ascended ID is linked to main account 5757 (which is still in active rankings, so must have an account) now?

By my reckoning, this is a breech of game rules in itself, which Omega performed prior to placing StrikeForce in TA.

~Norbe~


I presume you've done a personal recon? What does it show?

Re: TAF- Relearning the lessons of history..

Posted: Tue Mar 13, 2012 5:59 am
by Norbe
SSG EnterTheLion wrote:
Norbe wrote:ETL - I have not had an answer regarding the ascended ID of huxley's account and how it is not linked to the correct main account. Can you please answer this?

Norbe wrote:I do have one question regarding the StrikeForce account, and I would appreciate it if Omega will take the time to answer this.

The ascended server ID is 4081. Main ID is 75007
But the ascended ID 4081 was originally linked to main account ID 5757.

How was it possible for the switch to be made within the rules of the game, as accounts can only legally be bought and sold as a pair (main+ascended)? And which ascended ID is linked to main account 5757 (which is still in active rankings, so must have an account) now?

By my reckoning, this is a breech of game rules in itself, which Omega performed prior to placing StrikeForce in TA.

~Norbe~


I presume you've done a personal recon? What does it show?


I had the IDs verified by two separate sources as well as my own records. His ascended server account did belong to ID 5757, which is still actively in the main rankings. Stats on the account are irrelevant.

~Norbe~

Re: TAF- Relearning the lessons of history..

Posted: Tue Mar 13, 2012 6:02 am
by SSG EnterTheLion
Neimenljivi wrote:
SSG EnterTheLion wrote:
TAF- 100 odd members
OE- 20 odd..

hmm... I leave others to make the connections from your refusal.. :-"


Say what Huxley?
What other does misleading info mean than false info?
And no I am not jealous because I find someone who has the need to seek attention on the net a rather pathetic being, because it means that one is not getting enough attention elsewhere.

Really EtL? Hahahah you make me laugh xD
In fact, you might want to read the topics again: you can find the first war here: viewtopic.php?f=99&t=164887&hilit=TPP+vs+OE&start=60 (note read my post, those weren't small defences back then, they were the biggest among OE, but then again you can start re-reading from the beginning to freshen your memory) and viewtopic.php?f=99&t=170869&hilit=TPP+vs+OE this topic
I remember numerous chats in which you tried to negotiate peace with us, something you've never done before, not until your enemies came to you first anyway.

If you're calling me a liar and a big mouth and the one who never did any work, then why did you invite me to Omega in so many occasions? I also don't see how you were ignoring me or something like that, due to above mentioned fact lol xD

Oh right, I forgot, you were "just testing those planets" so you never spent any naq on them aside from the naq you were "assigned" to spend on them for "test purposes". Stop being a hypocrite.

Now stop living in the past and take a look around - OE is no more. I have hardly been around and even I know that lol. But then again, by the looks of it, you hardly were around too, seeing how great and mighty you think you are.

Also thumbs up for Noobert's post, you gained my respect mate :)

We did say Arr, lith :) Only natural they were falling so quickly hehe :D
Yeah he's trying to save his almost completely sunk ship. The only thing that's keeping it afloat are the slaves swimming under it.

~N


Here's a direct statement to you noob. Shall we ask admin about these supposed planets I had? Are you prepared to look like a fool?

PS: Invite you to Omega? lmao..that alone proves you are talking out of your ass. People APPLY to Omega, they aren't automatically selected. No one gets in automatically, no matter the account.

Removed.