StarGateWars Forums

Might as well change the title on this jont and just designate a team DDE.

Lord Katsumoto wrote:I mean come on DC, i don't care why you want this war. I've been off ppt, no nox no critical since this started. Not even a peep. You say you want war. Well i'm waiting. Marshall did getme on ascended. But i returned the favor through charon and vimes.

You and D1 did a good job on me in ascended, give us time we'll get you at some point

Andy! wrote:

~phalax~ wrote:

xXxsephirothxXx wrote:

Jedi~Tank wrote:

Guild wrote:seph isnt becoming a noob...hes always been... never mind


can we do DC vs TSD so then we can both have some fun rather than one side gettin absolutely smashed, it would mean only one side gets slightly smashed ??? .... and it would annoy seph

Thats fine, but not marshall.

Btw Marshall, most of the Dxm are still in DDE and funny how they never recall a pm saying They would be sat on if they left with you and vimes.

They might need to... i mean phalax kudo's again to rolling on your back as soon as you thought I was online... just let me chomp on all those spies and not even mass back after you got war setting... not surprised..

Sorry Giovanni,Robert did all the damage before you came in at the last second. I know your angry over being caught out from last post,but you need to let it go.

I'm still on jury service and trying to fight you guys via my iphone, not so easy.

BALIIFF. TAKE HIS PHONE!
*Bangs Gabble*

lol, yeah they take it off me tonight when we judicate

And I will be vacationing for easter holidays (4 days) while I go out for a hunt... feel free to insert chicken or DC running or other similar comments.....now....

~phalax~ wrote:

Lord Katsumoto wrote:I mean come on DC, i don't care why you want this war. I've been off ppt, no nox no critical since this started. Not even a peep. You say you want war. Well i'm waiting. Marshall did getme on ascended. But i returned the favor through charon and vimes.

You and D1 did a good job on me in ascended, give us time we'll get you at some point

Andy! wrote:

~phalax~ wrote:

xXxsephirothxXx wrote:

Jedi~Tank wrote:

Guild wrote:seph isnt becoming a noob...hes always been... never mind


can we do DC vs TSD so then we can both have some fun rather than one side gettin absolutely smashed, it would mean only one side gets slightly smashed ??? .... and it would annoy seph

Thats fine, but not marshall.

Btw Marshall, most of the Dxm are still in DDE and funny how they never recall a pm saying They would be sat on if they left with you and vimes.

They might need to... i mean phalax kudo's again to rolling on your back as soon as you thought I was online... just let me chomp on all those spies and not even mass back after you got war setting... not surprised..

Sorry Giovanni,Robert did all the damage before you came in at the last second. I know your angry over being caught out from last post,but you need to let it go.

I'm still on jury service and trying to fight you guys via my iphone, not so easy.

BALIIFF. TAKE HIS PHONE!
*Bangs Gabble*

lol, yeah they take it off me tonight when we judicate

And I will be vacationing for easter holidays (4 days) while I go out for a hunt... feel free to insert chicken or DC running or other similar comments.....now....

Nobody will down on you for doing real life bud, you need to check your own **Filtered** for that mentality..the point is if your not ready for war then why even declare it, because your leaders are **Filtered** that dont have the capacity to do an alliance any good. Postpone it or do teams but for gods sake this is bad lol. I mean its going to take yall a month just to be able to ATTEMPT a good mass and probably STILL wont do the ones that done you..not an insult just some thoughts to consider. Hell Ill even put all my UU in the killzone just to give you a shot at the title.

well boys and girls here i am, who missed me? im on holiday with no net just managed to buy some for a few hours, anyways ive never seen so much **Filtered** in my life xD

Anyways nice one marshall, getting my ascended while im not here

I ppted a lil and btw thanks for the dual marshall

Ill be back Late thursday night, and 00ra00 noob, GTHO, do you want that 7.5t naq i stole?

Btw GTHO if your not involved

Ill see you DC boys soon

Wolve

Jedi~Tank wrote:

~phalax~ wrote:

Lord Katsumoto wrote:I mean come on DC, i don't care why you want this war. I've been off ppt, no nox no critical since this started. Not even a peep. You say you want war. Well i'm waiting. Marshall did getme on ascended. But i returned the favor through charon and vimes.

You and D1 did a good job on me in ascended, give us time we'll get you at some point

Andy! wrote:

~phalax~ wrote:

xXxsephirothxXx wrote:

Jedi~Tank wrote:

Guild wrote:seph isnt becoming a noob...hes always been... never mind


can we do DC vs TSD so then we can both have some fun rather than one side gettin absolutely smashed, it would mean only one side gets slightly smashed ??? .... and it would annoy seph

Thats fine, but not marshall.

Btw Marshall, most of the Dxm are still in DDE and funny how they never recall a pm saying They would be sat on if they left with you and vimes.

They might need to... i mean phalax kudo's again to rolling on your back as soon as you thought I was online... just let me chomp on all those spies and not even mass back after you got war setting... not surprised..

Sorry Giovanni,Robert did all the damage before you came in at the last second. I know your angry over being caught out from last post,but you need to let it go.

I'm still on jury service and trying to fight you guys via my iphone, not so easy.

BALIIFF. TAKE HIS PHONE!
*Bangs Gabble*

lol, yeah they take it off me tonight when we judicate

And I will be vacationing for easter holidays (4 days) while I go out for a hunt... feel free to insert chicken or DC running or other similar comments.....now....

Nobody will down on you for doing real life bud, you need to check your own **Filtered** for that mentality..the point is if your not ready for war then why even declare it, because your leaders are **Filtered** that dont have the capacity to do an alliance any good. Postpone it or do teams but for gods sake this is bad lol. I mean its going to take yall a month just to be able to ATTEMPT a good mass and probably STILL wont do the ones that done you..not an insult just some thoughts to consider. Hell Ill even put all my UU in the killzone just to give you a shot at the title.

I'll leave that to the bosses, but all I will say is I'm glad they made the call to stand up wheather we get demolish each and every day or not.

I personally don't like the team battle concept (sorry Mezz ) This game is about alliances and empires and ill feeling towards those alliances.. It would be much better if there was a way to win wars...thats all I'm sayin'

I'm just happy Giovanni showed me a good time last night..until Robert came along then xxxsep and whoever else that was sabbing while Gio and I were sharing repair naq

The team battle concept is so smaller aaliances can compete, lets face it...if all you mass is semi active or equals that doesnt hardly constitute massing the alliance or a claim to victory. 11 v 11 would be more advantageous nd fun for all involved.

Jedi~Tank wrote:The team battle concept is so smaller aaliances can compete, lets face it...if all you mass is semi active or equals that doesnt hardly constitute massing the alliance or a claim to victory. 11 v 11 would be more advantageous nd fun for all involved.

Yip true, equal numbers is fairer, but if alliances want to habour semi or inactives thats their problem and will have to put up with the comments that follow.

Winning a war should be a series of things leading to a reward and a disadvantage.

Anyhoo we are off topic and only have 300 pages to catch up to the OE/TAF topic

~phalax~ wrote:

Jedi~Tank wrote:The team battle concept is so smaller aaliances can compete, lets face it...if all you mass is semi active or equals that doesnt hardly constitute massing the alliance or a claim to victory. 11 v 11 would be more advantageous nd fun for all involved.

Yip true, equal numbers is fairer, but if alliances want to habour semi or inactives thats their problem and will have to put up with the comments that follow.

Winning a war should be a series of things leading to a reward and a disadvantage.

Anyhoo we are off topic and only have 300 pages to catch up to the OE/TAF topic

lol, its mostly TAF....and TAF have DDE/FS war thread beat.

Rudy Pena wrote:

~phalax~ wrote:

Jedi~Tank wrote:The team battle concept is so smaller aaliances can compete, lets face it...if all you mass is semi active or equals that doesnt hardly constitute massing the alliance or a claim to victory. 11 v 11 would be more advantageous nd fun for all involved.

Yip true, equal numbers is fairer, but if alliances want to habour semi or inactives thats their problem and will have to put up with the comments that follow.

Winning a war should be a series of things leading to a reward and a disadvantage.

Anyhoo we are off topic and only have 300 pages to catch up to the OE/TAF topic

lol, its mostly TAF....and TAF have DDE/FS war thread beat.

Thats allot pf smackin talkin

Rudy Pena wrote:

~phalax~ wrote:

Jedi~Tank wrote:The team battle concept is so smaller aaliances can compete, lets face it...if all you mass is semi active or equals that doesnt hardly constitute massing the alliance or a claim to victory. 11 v 11 would be more advantageous nd fun for all involved.

Yip true, equal numbers is fairer, but if alliances want to habour semi or inactives thats their problem and will have to put up with the comments that follow.

Winning a war should be a series of things leading to a reward and a disadvantage.

Anyhoo we are off topic and only have 300 pages to catch up to the OE/TAF topic

lol, its mostly TAF....and TAF have DDE/FS war thread beat.

i can.t find reply rudy clean your account

R0B3RT wrote:

Rudy Pena wrote:

~phalax~ wrote:

Jedi~Tank wrote:The team battle concept is so smaller aaliances can compete, lets face it...if all you mass is semi active or equals that doesnt hardly constitute massing the alliance or a claim to victory. 11 v 11 would be more advantageous nd fun for all involved.

Yip true, equal numbers is fairer, but if alliances want to habour semi or inactives thats their problem and will have to put up with the comments that follow.

Winning a war should be a series of things leading to a reward and a disadvantage.

Anyhoo we are off topic and only have 300 pages to catch up to the OE/TAF topic

lol, its mostly TAF....and TAF have DDE/FS war thread beat.

i can.t find reply rudy clean your account

lol How should i clean it?

Rudy Pena wrote:

R0B3RT wrote:

Rudy Pena wrote:

~phalax~ wrote:

Jedi~Tank wrote:The team battle concept is so smaller aaliances can compete, lets face it...if all you mass is semi active or equals that doesnt hardly constitute massing the alliance or a claim to victory. 11 v 11 would be more advantageous nd fun for all involved.

Yip true, equal numbers is fairer, but if alliances want to habour semi or inactives thats their problem and will have to put up with the comments that follow.

Winning a war should be a series of things leading to a reward and a disadvantage.

Anyhoo we are off topic and only have 300 pages to catch up to the OE/TAF topic

lol, its mostly TAF....and TAF have DDE/FS war thread beat.

i can.t find reply rudy clean your account

lol How should i clean it?

please bmj mathlord taf story

R0B3RT wrote:

Rudy Pena wrote:

R0B3RT wrote:

Rudy Pena wrote:

~phalax~ wrote:

Jedi~Tank wrote:The team battle concept is so smaller aaliances can compete, lets face it...if all you mass is semi active or equals that doesnt hardly constitute massing the alliance or a claim to victory. 11 v 11 would be more advantageous nd fun for all involved.

Yip true, equal numbers is fairer, but if alliances want to habour semi or inactives thats their problem and will have to put up with the comments that follow.

Winning a war should be a series of things leading to a reward and a disadvantage.

Anyhoo we are off topic and only have 300 pages to catch up to the OE/TAF topic

lol, its mostly TAF....and TAF have DDE/FS war thread beat.

i can.t find reply rudy clean your account

lol How should i clean it?

please bmj mathlord taf story

bmj, ran to vac mode soon after he lost his strike. lol And already got math.

Rudy Pena wrote:

R0B3RT wrote:

Rudy Pena wrote:

R0B3RT wrote:

Rudy Pena wrote:

~phalax~ wrote:

Jedi~Tank wrote:The team battle concept is so smaller aaliances can compete, lets face it...if all you mass is semi active or equals that doesnt hardly constitute massing the alliance or a claim to victory. 11 v 11 would be more advantageous nd fun for all involved.

Yip true, equal numbers is fairer, but if alliances want to habour semi or inactives thats their problem and will have to put up with the comments that follow.

Winning a war should be a series of things leading to a reward and a disadvantage.

Anyhoo we are off topic and only have 300 pages to catch up to the OE/TAF topic

lol, its mostly TAF....and TAF have DDE/FS war thread beat.

i can.t find reply rudy clean your account

lol How should i clean it?

please bmj mathlord taf story

bmj, ran to vac mode soon after he lost his strike. lol And already got math.

kill them

Thats what we've been doing.