Page 12 of 17

Re: Leaders of CIA

Posted: Thu May 03, 2007 1:02 am
by Robe
J.S. wrote:Congratulations and rejoice everyone in the new NEW GA.. Robe has finally gotten what she wanted.. To be a leader in a major super alliance..
Jamie



I admit to being the Leader of a Super Alliance.

I am Leader of the Foundation :-D

Posted: Thu May 03, 2007 1:11 am
by Juliette
That's a "superb" alliance, Robe... ;)

= bows to the evil Magnificent Robe, leading us all into either doom or glory =

Re: Leaders of CIA

Posted: Thu May 03, 2007 1:12 am
by Nigatsu_Aka
Robe wrote:
J.S. wrote:Congratulations and rejoice everyone in the new NEW GA.. Robe has finally gotten what she wanted.. To be a leader in a major super alliance..
Jamie



I admit to being the Leader of a Super Alliance.

I am Leader of the Foundation :-D


Hmm... i think TL can be called a super-alliance, but not TF.
TF with the exception of a douzen of players consists in mercs. :-D

Posted: Thu May 03, 2007 1:19 am
by J.S.
Pele wrote:How are we using CoP tactics? Massing them? Farming them? Raiding them? Sorry I didn't realise you could only make you account stronger if you were in CoP. Silly me.


By allowing tweety to be massed by one of the CIA members and not even trying to stop it.. If I where in that position I would protect tweety since she helped BOTH sides.. But all you lot care about is she helped your enemy so she "has to be destroyed"..

As for the hate that people associate me with CIA.. Ok yeah to be honest I am especially pissed off with EPA for turning thier backs on everything the alliance was about when it was set up.. They used to above anythng else protect people.. And when I was "invited" to war by a friend of mine when I got in the conversation, I was told I was a spy.. And people went mad at me.. Which is total bull.. So yeah I am a little pissed off at the people who where supposed to be my side.. Who wouldn't?

Then there was the general BS saying I couldn't be trusted and that noone from the EPAc should talk to me, a few different people have said it to me so no point denying it.. Its funny how people forget so easily everything you do for them when you go against what they believe in....

But I've put that behind me as I know who my friends are.. Yeah some are CIA, some are CoP and some are neutral.. I stand by the decisions I made.. And I stand by this thread..

If you condone the actions taken by one person/group and you allow others who you associate yourself with, that makes you a hypocrit!!!

If any CIA members stick together or not at the end that is to be seen... The EPA I was once in and joined would have gone against the legion for such actions.. I guess that will never happen.. So much for honour in your friendships..

Posted: Thu May 03, 2007 1:26 am
by Raven
J.S. wrote:
Pele wrote:How are we using CoP tactics? Massing them? Farming them? Raiding them? Sorry I didn't realise you could only make you account stronger if you were in CoP. Silly me.


By allowing tweety to be massed by one of the CIA members and not even trying to stop it.. If I where in that position I would protect tweety since she helped BOTH sides.. But all you lot care about is she helped your enemy so she "has to be destroyed"..

As for the hate that people associate me with CIA.. Ok yeah to be honest I am especially pissed off with EPA for turning thier backs on everything the alliance was about when it was set up.. They used to above anythng else protect people.. And when I was "invited" to war by a friend of mine when I got in the conversation, I was told I was a spy.. And people went mad at me.. Which is total bull.. So yeah I am a little pissed off at the people who where supposed to be my side.. Who wouldn't?

Then there was the general BS saying I couldn't be trusted and that noone from the EPAc should talk to me, a few different people have said it to me so no point denying it.. Its funny how people forget so easily everything you do for them when you go against what they believe in....

But I've put that behind me as I know who my friends are.. Yeah some are CIA, some are CoP and some are neutral.. I stand by the decisions I made.. And I stand by this thread..

If you condone the actions taken by one person/group and you allow others who you associate yourself with, that makes you a hypocrit!!!

If any CIA members stick together or not at the end that is to be seen... The EPA I was once in and joined would have gone against the legion for such actions.. I guess that will never happen.. So much for honour in your friendships..



Sadly you have no power on what TL decides to do nor have any other CIA alliance .......
Tweety admitted to helping the enemy [and it wasnt regular trading]
We made a decision based on that and frankly i really dont have a clue why you think you have to judge us cause we really dont give a xxxx

Posted: Thu May 03, 2007 1:27 am
by J.S.
Raven wrote:
J.S. wrote:
Pele wrote:How are we using CoP tactics? Massing them? Farming them? Raiding them? Sorry I didn't realise you could only make you account stronger if you were in CoP. Silly me.


By allowing tweety to be massed by one of the CIA members and not even trying to stop it.. If I where in that position I would protect tweety since she helped BOTH sides.. But all you lot care about is she helped your enemy so she "has to be destroyed"..

As for the hate that people associate me with CIA.. Ok yeah to be honest I am especially pissed off with EPA for turning thier backs on everything the alliance was about when it was set up.. They used to above anythng else protect people.. And when I was "invited" to war by a friend of mine when I got in the conversation, I was told I was a spy.. And people went mad at me.. Which is total bull.. So yeah I am a little pissed off at the people who where supposed to be my side.. Who wouldn't?

Then there was the general BS saying I couldn't be trusted and that noone from the EPAc should talk to me, a few different people have said it to me so no point denying it.. Its funny how people forget so easily everything you do for them when you go against what they believe in....

But I've put that behind me as I know who my friends are.. Yeah some are CIA, some are CoP and some are neutral.. I stand by the decisions I made.. And I stand by this thread..

If you condone the actions taken by one person/group and you allow others who you associate yourself with, that makes you a hypocrit!!!

If any CIA members stick together or not at the end that is to be seen... The EPA I was once in and joined would have gone against the legion for such actions.. I guess that will never happen.. So much for honour in your friendships..



Sadly you have no power on what TL decides to do nor have any other CIA alliance .......
Tweety admitted to helping the enemy [and it wasnt regular trading]
We made a decision based on that and frankly i really dont have a clue why you think you have to judge us cause we really dont give a s#it


If you didn't give a toss about it why are you posting?

Your missing my point completely :roll:

Posted: Thu May 03, 2007 1:31 am
by Raven
J.S. wrote:
If you didn't give a toss about it why are you posting?

Your missing my point completely :roll:


Because i think you had your share of attention and its really not up to you what we do....

Posted: Thu May 03, 2007 1:46 am
by J.S.
Raven wrote:
J.S. wrote:
If you didn't give a toss about it why are you posting?

Your missing my point completely :roll:


Because i think you had your share of attention and its really not up to you what we do....



Still missing the point :roll:

My point is all these CIA members where condoning when CoP did the exact same thing as the legion have done but becuase the legion are on CIA's side its ok.. Yes some have condoned it but not enough..

Posted: Thu May 03, 2007 2:01 am
by Zeon
Can I ask ya'll a question. Is the majority of players even fighting this war anymore, Do you think we really care so much as feel like we have to use a our fly swatters more freq. now. Really, whats the point and what do you hope to achieve?

Posted: Thu May 03, 2007 2:02 am
by Raven
J.S. wrote:
Raven wrote:
J.S. wrote:
If you didn't give a toss about it why are you posting?

Your missing my point completely :roll:


Because i think you had your share of attention and its really not up to you what we do....



Still missing the point :roll:

My point is all these CIA members where condoning when CoP did the exact same thing as the legion have done but becuase the legion are on CIA's side its ok.. Yes some have condoned it but not enough..



I think people are forgetting how CoP was ........ this isnt without a reason it may be one you do not agree with but thats not my problem.....

TL never has done any random massing whatsoever and judging us by this 1 thing isnt really fair .....

I know your prolly building up some credit from CoP as you might think they still come out victorious but there other ways to kiss their ass you know :lol:

Posted: Thu May 03, 2007 2:05 am
by Juliette
[DDE] Zeon wrote:Can I ask ya'll a question. Is the majority of players even fighting this war anymore, Do you think we really care so much as feel like we have to use a our fly swatters more freq. now. Really, whats the point and what do you hope to achieve?


Did the FRA abandon its cause, while being swatted? ;)

KGB stands by the charter of CIA, and will continue to do so until an official, permanent end of hostilities is announced by our leaders.
To answer your question... yes, Ze, we still fight. :) And if we'd show a moment's weakness, we'd be reminded of our pledge, and we would fight again, until this story ends and we can begin to sing songs of our victories, and honour our glorious dead.

Posted: Thu May 03, 2007 2:33 am
by Zeon
I don't think it's that we have abandoned the cause, were just board. Not much can really be done. defenses are taken, planets abandoned. but victory of loss is unobtainable. We fight, waste resources against something that will not change us of or our accounts. The thrill is gone.

Posted: Thu May 03, 2007 2:42 am
by Juliette
In that case, this has turned into a war of attrition...
Whose members will quit due to being bored first. :P

It's a long shot... but who knows. Maybe the war will end like a candle in a closed room? Burning long, until the oxygen runs out and the candle dims and fades out... :)

Posted: Thu May 03, 2007 5:05 am
by Major Lincoln LaFayette
(DDE) zeon wrote:I don't think it's that we have abandoned the cause, were just board. Not much can really be done. defenses are taken, planets abandoned. but victory of loss is unobtainable. We fight, waste resources against something that will not change us of or our accounts. The thrill is gone.


ROTFL!

Forgive me. I am about to taunt. (I don't like to do that, but some truths must be told)

Bored? Hmmm. So, that's why you've been losing. Forgive me, I thought it was because of the determined and unflinching array of forces assembled against you.

LOL! I should have known that it could not be that CoP has been beaten. That CAN'T happen! Egos that large can not admit defeat.

Let's see. Your members are dribbling away because they realisticly see the futility of your situation. Some outside alliances are looking like refugee camps- full of fled (and smart) ex-CoP members.

Tiny accounts feed off you like hungry wolves.

And despite some few of you using darkside CoP tactics that have been the reason for the war like stealing and abandoning planets and attacking officers, your past trangressions have made an enemy too determined to be put off by such things.

Zeon, you are not bored, you are helpless in the face of a more determined opponent. LOL For proof, who could have imagined a post like this about CoP before the Uprising?

Bored now?

The thrill is gone because you have not been on the losing side before. It can be disheartening and cause that ;thrill is gone' feeling. That's what is bothering you. So, admit it and move on.

You can't fend off the truth about what everybody knows by denying it. We can all see the numbers and fled ex- CoP names. Being stubborn will just lose you more members and prolong the misery.


For those honorable CoP members, please forgive the tone of this post. It is not directed at the bulk of you. It is directed at those who make the above kind of post. I am tired of the pointless 'spin' when the truth is so clear.

It is starting to get embarassing.

CoP was the greatest SGW alliance ever. Do your legacy justice and stop playing this kind of lose on the field, try to win in the forum crap. It dulls your legend.

As part of the rag tag collection of rebels that stood up to you, I admit my pride in being part of this war. My hat is off to the ability of the CoP alliance. Pity they are not great enough to acknowlege the worth of the opponent that bested them or the truth that no one can be the top dog forever.

It is over. It is just a matter of time before you admit/realize it.

Posted: Thu May 03, 2007 5:25 am
by bamse
J.S. wrote:
Pele wrote:How are we using CoP tactics? Massing them? Farming them? Raiding them? Sorry I didn't realise you could only make you account stronger if you were in CoP. Silly me.


By allowing tweety to be massed by one of the CIA members and not even trying to stop it.. If I where in that position I would protect tweety since she helped BOTH sides.. But all you lot care about is she helped your enemy so she "has to be destroyed"..

As for the hate that people associate me with CIA.. Ok yeah to be honest I am especially pissed off with EPA for turning thier backs on everything the alliance was about when it was set up.. They used to above anythng else protect people.. And when I was "invited" to war by a friend of mine when I got in the conversation, I was told I was a spy.. And people went mad at me.. Which is total bull.. So yeah I am a little pissed off at the people who where supposed to be my side.. Who wouldn't?

Then there was the general BS saying I couldn't be trusted and that noone from the EPAc should talk to me, a few different people have said it to me so no point denying it.. Its funny how people forget so easily everything you do for them when you go against what they believe in....

But I've put that behind me as I know who my friends are.. Yeah some are CIA, some are CoP and some are neutral.. I stand by the decisions I made.. And I stand by this thread..

If you condone the actions taken by one person/group and you allow others who you associate yourself with, that makes you a hypocrit!!!

If any CIA members stick together or not at the end that is to be seen... The EPA I was once in and joined would have gone against the legion for such actions.. I guess that will never happen.. So much for honour in your friendships..



FOR THE LAST TIME JAIME!!!

Can you stop generalizing! You are talking about SPECIFIC PEOPLE that you know, or should I say KNEW.

Back in the "good old days" when you were a member of EPAc, this would never have happened? All you could have done was complain and whine. Guess what, a lot has changed since you were a member and you wouldn't have been able to avoid Tweety getting massed because CIA is a huge pact of alliances. WE do NOT act as ONE on every single issue on Earth, even though you seem to think so.

And people have a hard time seeing why we would disband after the war, lol :)