Page 14 of 27
Re: Eros - Removed as Ombudsman
Posted: Sun Jan 06, 2008 4:55 pm
by Phoenix of Terra
I haven't taken stats and understand...
Re: Eros - Removed as Ombudsman
Posted: Sun Jan 06, 2008 4:55 pm
by Ero`Sore
No you either have no idea what I'm talking about or simply acting like you don't. I think its the later.
Re: Eros - Removed as Ombudsman
Posted: Sun Jan 06, 2008 4:58 pm
by AncientAnubis
Ero`Sore wrote:No you either have no idea what I'm talking about or simply acting like you don't. I think its the later.
I understand very well what you're talking about, hell I'm even trying to tell you what I know IN THE INTEREST OF THE ACCURACY OF YOUR POLL. I don't care one way or the other how the poll goes on the opinion of the mods, I myself voted that they do an average job. Stop misreading and misconstruing everything I say, surely you're more intelligent than that.
Re: Eros - Removed as Ombudsman
Posted: Sun Jan 06, 2008 4:59 pm
by Phoenix of Terra
The mods are part of the community. Unless of course, they're all programs created by Jason

Conspiracy!
Re: Eros - Removed as Ombudsman
Posted: Sun Jan 06, 2008 5:11 pm
by Ero`Sore
You folks have no common sense. I refuse to stoop down to your level and look stupid by further arguing this with you.
Re: Eros - Removed as Ombudsman
Posted: Sun Jan 06, 2008 5:13 pm
by Phoenix of Terra
Ero`Sore wrote:You folks have no common sense. I refuse to stoop down to your level and look stupid by further arguing this with you.
QFRT!
Re: Eros - Removed as Ombudsman
Posted: Sun Jan 06, 2008 5:25 pm
by AncientAnubis
Ero`Sore wrote:You folks have no common sense. I refuse to stoop down to your level and look stupid by further arguing this with you.
Really, we try to calmly and logically explain to you and you don't understand. We get angry and try to knock it into that thick head of yours and yet again you STILL don't understand. Are you even trying to understand or can you just NOT understand? Or is it that you don't even bother reading? I've found it quite amusing how you quote others and reply and it completely misses the point of what they said. Let me ask you this, if you don't care what the results of your polls were/are/will be, why did you even make them? Why not just go off a-massing everyone that has opposed you and admit that you completely disregard everything that's said. Does it even matter that you lose more and more respect every time you post? Probably not, as long as you get the mods and others to lose their respect. Honestly though, if this is the sort of thing you're going to drag everyone but your little "community" through for who knows how long, maybe it's better if you leave this place entirely. That might be the best for your mental health as well as ours.
Re: Eros - Removed as Ombudsman
Posted: Sun Jan 06, 2008 5:34 pm
by Ero`Sore
Okay this is the RL logic you're suggesting:
I am being convicted of a crime, and I am on the jury of my own crime.
(mods are being convicted of doing bad, and they are on the jury)
Man your logic is A

That is why just like the defendant cannot vote for himself, neither can the mods (well they can since I cannot place restrictions in the poll, which is why I am subtracted their votes)
Re: Eros - Removed as Ombudsman
Posted: Sun Jan 06, 2008 5:37 pm
by Phoenix of Terra
Ero`Sore wrote:Okay this is the RL logic you're suggesting:
I am being convicted of a crime, and I am on the jury of my own crime.
Man your logic is A

No, my(our?) logic is:
Elections are implaced.
Votes are taken.
Vote-counters choose to not count votes and spin votes into their own support. (illegal in most democratic elections)
Votes favor vote-counters POV (of course).
Edit- BTW, people can vote in their own elections.
Re: Eros - Removed as Ombudsman
Posted: Sun Jan 06, 2008 5:40 pm
by Ero`Sore
This is not an election. It is a trial.
Re: Eros - Removed as Ombudsman
Posted: Sun Jan 06, 2008 5:41 pm
by AncientAnubis
Phoenix of Terra wrote:Ero`Sore wrote:Okay this is the RL logic you're suggesting:
I am being convicted of a crime, and I am on the jury of my own crime.
Man your logic is A

No, my(our?) logic is:
Elections are implaced.
Votes are taken.
Vote-counters choose to not count votes and spin votes into their own support. (illegal in most democratic elections)
Votes favor vote-counters POV (of course).
Edit- BTW, people can vote in their own elections.
Was he replying to you or me? I can't tell anymore.
Re: Eros - Removed as Ombudsman
Posted: Sun Jan 06, 2008 5:41 pm
by HairyMehoff
Ero`Sore wrote:This is not an election. It is a trial.
This Is Pathetic
Re: Eros - Removed as Ombudsman
Posted: Sun Jan 06, 2008 5:44 pm
by Phoenix of Terra
Ero`Sore wrote:This is not an election. It is a trial.
Actually, it's more of a ridiculous, circus show debacle.
Plus, jurors are chosen for impartiality through a rather strict screening and are given to options, guilty or not guilty. Not: not guilty, sort of guilty, sort of guilty, guilty, more guilty, and lead to believe the sort of guilty votes can go either way, rather than straight to guilty.
Re: Eros - Removed as Ombudsman
Posted: Sun Jan 06, 2008 5:44 pm
by Phoenix of Terra
AncientAnubis wrote:Phoenix of Terra wrote:Ero`Sore wrote:Okay this is the RL logic you're suggesting:
I am being convicted of a crime, and I am on the jury of my own crime.
Man your logic is A

No, my(our?) logic is:
Elections are implaced.
Votes are taken.
Vote-counters choose to not count votes and spin votes into their own support. (illegal in most democratic elections)
Votes favor vote-counters POV (of course).
Edit- BTW, people can vote in their own elections.
Was he replying to you or me? I can't tell anymore.
We're on the same side, aren't we?
Re: Eros - Removed as Ombudsman
Posted: Sun Jan 06, 2008 5:45 pm
by Ero`Sore
HairyMehoff wrote:Ero`Sore wrote:This is not an election. It is a trial.
This Is Pathetic
Good one!
