Lore and Deni
Deni and everyone else arguing with Lore,
I do not think that Lore is pro or counter this market update, because I don't think that it affects him and if it is to generalise, i think that few players who pay with naq for ATs are affected by this. Simply: the ATs will always exist at a steady flow, because there are more semiactive players (AT sellers) than hyperactive (AT spenders) and there are not that many who buy ATs with their market turns. The control unit for this is the ammount of naq that can be farmed from innactives, that is proffitable for the hyperactive farmer and also the UU price (but i'm not going to explain this because it gives me headaches and few will understand anyway).
Lore said it very well
here and i have said it too,
over here and i qoute: "less ingame market turns -> less bm market turns for 1$ -> players need to spend more $ for his crap". Both Lore and me admitted that we (I at least) will not be buying turns from his black market with $ as a protest for his lack of interest for the gamers (also observable in the "game updates" page of the game - rather lack of... significant/good ones). The $$$ is the only thing that interests admin... all the updates were made for his pocket... when he saw an oportunity he released the updates that gave him more $ at that time. And all that resulted in what the game is today.