Page 14 of 15
Re: Proposed ban on assault weapons by Obama
Posted: Wed Jan 23, 2013 8:22 pm
by curtthehurt1
Re: Proposed ban on assault weapons by Obama
Posted: Wed Jan 23, 2013 10:02 pm
by Master Rahl
You know almost all shootings have been committed by people that would not pass background checks? Lousy law. We are blaming the tools, not the people behind them.
Also some things I love to say...
[spoiler]You know the largest attack on American soil wasn’t caused by guns? It was caused by box knives?
Drugs have a direct correlation to violence but 2 states legalized pot? (not saying supporting/or against just looking at facts)[/spoiler]
Re: Proposed ban on assault weapons by Obama
Posted: Thu Jan 24, 2013 12:08 am
by [KMA]Avenger
xDaku wrote:http://www.guardian.co.uk/news/datablog/2011/jan/10/gun-crime-us-state


That chart does not separate murders such as gang related and so on. it simply lumps all gun crime stats together.
Also, many gun crimes in the UK are not reported if the gun is not fired.
Re: Proposed ban on assault weapons by Obama
Posted: Thu Jan 24, 2013 5:44 am
by Kjarkur
I find that to be odd. Of course it should be reported. If a gun is used to commit a crime, fired or not, it was still used. The criminal in question wouldn't have been as intimidating with a pencil now would he...
Re: Proposed ban on assault weapons by Obama
Posted: Thu Jan 24, 2013 10:19 am
by [KMA]Avenger
Kjarkur wrote:I find that to be odd. Of course it should be reported. If a gun is used to commit a crime, fired or not, it was still used. The criminal in question wouldn't have been as intimidating with a pencil now would he...
It's not my opinion mate. when i first heard it i was like "eh!?!" and i went and had a look and sure enough it's true...have a look for yourselves.
They want chaos because from chaos they can then present you the solution they had planned and also as a way to grab more power because the people always turn to govt and demand more security, it's social control. social control-controlling the masses-is easy. look at Jaws the film, i don't know what the yearly statistics are for shark attacks and deaths by shark attack but it's very low. when that film came out the beaches of the world was near void of people because suddenly everyone was afraid to step into the water...because of a film.
Look, 1 thing is 100% and that's the soon to be economic collapse. the worlds debt is out of control and can never be paid back, it's impossible to pay the debt, and nearly every govt of the world is printing money and buying it's own debt, they are monetising the debt and i can assure you, hyper inflation is on the way...seen the cost of living lately? last year i was spending between £50 and £70 on shopping (groceries), it's now costing me upwards of £90 for less than what i was getting this time last year. also, America is borrowing billions from the Chinese to keep waging these wars, they will want their money back sooner rather than later.
Have you lot heard what Germany has done recently? I'll assume you haven't heard. the German govt recently put in a request to have their gold leased to the Americans repatriated (returned). this is unheard of, it's the first time a western govt has made such a request. now the question has to be...why?! I'll assume again that none have been following the news-the real news that is. the reason is simple, because when the global economy does collapse the only thing that will be worth anything are commodities and food (and some other bartering items such as seed, alcohol, bullets batteries and so on). also, when it does happen, people are going to be looking for their guns to not only keep the criminals back but also the govt...now who is asking for the guns again...oh yeah...the govt.
There's so much more to this i would need to be writing till this time tomorrow to cover it all!
And before anyone says it...i don't deal in theories!
Re: Proposed ban on assault weapons by Obama
Posted: Fri Jan 25, 2013 4:12 am
by [KMA]Avenger
These guys will think twice before trying crap like this again!
Well done to the 15 year old protecting his 12 year old sister and their home!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UBe48u6ERiIBut lets not promote guns, instead lets take them away and make victims of kids like these.
Stick that in your pipes and smoke it gun grabbers!
http://www.nationalreview.com/articles/ ... a-bigelow#
Re: Proposed ban on assault weapons by Obama
Posted: Fri Jan 25, 2013 3:47 pm
by Kjarkur
[KMA]Avenger wrote:Kjarkur wrote:I find that to be odd. Of course it should be reported. If a gun is used to commit a crime, fired or not, it was still used. The criminal in question wouldn't have been as intimidating with a pencil now would he...
It's not my opinion mate. when i first heard it i was like "eh!?!" and i went and had a look and sure enough it's true...have a look for yourselves.
It's not that I don't believe you. But I think it's strange. In fact it stinks.
Re: Proposed ban on assault weapons by Obama
Posted: Sat Jan 26, 2013 2:33 am
by [KMA]Avenger
Kjarkur wrote:It's not that I don't believe you. But I think it's strange. In fact it stinks.
Of course it stinks, anybody in their right mind would think so...not the police though. plus 1 thing else i found out about the UK and crimes reported (cannot speak for other nations if they do the same), if multiple crimes are committed at the same time it's only reported as a single crime. so if i break into your house, beat you up and steal your things and kill someone in your house with a gun it will only be reported as a murder and i would be sent to prison for murder. the other crimes of theft and in possession of a firearm and also bodily harm is not punished.
They are cooking the numbers big time.
Re: Proposed ban on assault weapons by Obama
Posted: Sat Jan 26, 2013 9:13 am
by Kjarkur
[KMA]Avenger wrote:Kjarkur wrote:It's not that I don't believe you. But I think it's strange. In fact it stinks.
Of course it stinks, anybody in their right mind would think so...not the police though. plus 1 thing else i found out about the UK and crimes reported (cannot speak for other nations if they do the same), if multiple crimes are committed at the same time it's only reported as a single crime. so if i break into your house, beat you up and steal your things and kill someone in your house with a gun it will only be reported as a murder and i would be sent to prison for murder. the other crimes of theft and in possession of a firearm and also bodily harm is not punished.
They are cooking the numbers big time.
Yeah what a load of BS... I'm gonna check out how it's done here. But with such a low crime rate there is no reason for our police/government to meddle with it. But still will be interesting to find out.
Re: Proposed ban on assault weapons by Obama
Posted: Mon Jan 28, 2013 4:21 am
by [KMA]Avenger
Re: Proposed ban on assault weapons by Obama
Posted: Mon Jan 28, 2013 2:39 pm
by Dexter Morgan™
smartest guy on this forum.
@ curt - miss ya bud, funny pic!!
KILLUMINATI
Re: Proposed ban on assault weapons by Obama
Posted: Mon Jan 28, 2013 11:39 pm
by [KMA]Avenger
[KMA]Avenger wrote:Dr. Walter Bishop™ wrote:
smartest guy on this forum.
Who me?

you must be joking!...but i appreciate the sentiment

Re: Proposed ban on assault weapons by Obama
Posted: Tue Jan 29, 2013 2:16 pm
by Dexter Morgan™
Anyone who puts themselves into the public eye as "some crazy conspiracy nut", which we both know is not true as we check facts out before believing let alone saying, has enough intelligence to know its better to be disappointed and informed than blissfully ignorant until it is too late.

NoBama shame on you. SHAME ON YOU. GW will be eating grapes in heaven compared to where you will be! (If you believe that sort of thing.)
I will shoot you a PM and if you want can join my facebook page. It is my political tyranny is wrong page. Lots of good people who are fighting for what is RIGHT and the TRUTH.
Facebook is a double edged sword. I deleted my RL one and now only run the one that is nothing but fighting NWO. Mark Suckeredusberg already has everyone's ip but I don't care, if I disappear people know what happened. Just check a FEMA camp

Re: Proposed ban on assault weapons by Obama
Posted: Wed Jan 30, 2013 12:33 am
by [KMA]Avenger
Dr. Walter Bishop™ wrote:Anyone who puts themselves into the public eye as "some crazy conspiracy nut", which we both know is not true as we check facts out before believing let alone saying, has enough intelligence to know its better to be disappointed and informed than blissfully ignorant until it is too late.

NoBama shame on you. SHAME ON YOU. GW will be eating grapes in heaven compared to where you will be! (If you believe that sort of thing.)
I will shoot you a PM and if you want can join my facebook page. It is my political tyranny is wrong page. Lots of good people who are fighting for what is RIGHT and the TRUTH.
Facebook is a double edged sword. I deleted my RL one and now only run the one that is nothing but fighting NWO. Mark Suckeredusberg already has everyone's ip but I don't care, if I disappear people know what happened. Just check a FEMA camp

LOOL, great post. to understand me better, a few years back i lost my business, my home and a shed load of cash. i won't go into how this happened. the point being that when you go through something as bad as what i went through you lose allot of the ego you had, that's why i do what i do (not just on these boards) and don't care what people think about me so long as what i say is the truth-or as close to it as i can get, and when wrong i admit i was wrong-and i stand on my morals.
Thanks for the FB invite but i don't have an account, i frigging hate FB. i deleted my account about 3 years ago i think when i read that Zuckerberg calls his users dumb effers.
Re: Proposed ban on assault weapons by Obama
Posted: Thu Jan 31, 2013 12:20 am
by Dexter Morgan™
Oh I am well aware of Mark Suckeredusberg
I just don't care though. It is a great way to spread the message. I have a seperate page and have de-activated my personal one. I alctually have a political assosciation I am starting on there and there is a link through my account.
GET THE INFO OUT NO MATTER THROUGH THE ENEMY OR NOT, THEY ALL ARE EVERYWHERE ANYWAY. ON THE NET THEY FOLLOW WHOMEVER THEY WANT WARRANTLESS JUST FOR POLITICAL REASONS. SUCKS.