Page 14 of 21

Re: iFLuX vs Z E R O

Posted: Tue Jun 04, 2013 1:29 pm
by Commander Vimes
Guild wrote:
Borek wrote:I'm just posting in a thread, by your reasoning you are sleeping with HVE i suppose?
I sleep with anyone I can lay my hands on :smt047
he's not kidding.... what he did to that panda is unthinkable.... :smt078 lol

Re: iFLuX vs Z E R O

Posted: Tue Jun 04, 2013 1:43 pm
by harchester
Commander Vimes wrote:
Guild wrote:
Borek wrote:I'm just posting in a thread, by your reasoning you are sleeping with HVE i suppose?
I sleep with anyone I can lay my hands on :smt047
he's not kidding.... what he did to that panda is unthinkable.... :smt078 lol
Oh hai their :-D

Re: iFLuX vs Z E R O

Posted: Tue Jun 04, 2013 1:44 pm
by Guild
Commander Vimes wrote:
Guild wrote:
Borek wrote:I'm just posting in a thread, by your reasoning you are sleeping with HVE i suppose?
I sleep with anyone I can lay my hands on :smt047
he's not kidding.... what he did to that panda is unthinkable.... :smt078 lol
lol :D hey that was mutual love ! she came onto me ! 8-[

Re: iFLuX vs Z E R O

Posted: Tue Jun 04, 2013 2:12 pm
by Commander Vimes
Guild wrote:
Commander Vimes wrote:
Guild wrote:
Borek wrote:I'm just posting in a thread, by your reasoning you are sleeping with HVE i suppose?
I sleep with anyone I can lay my hands on :smt047
he's not kidding.... what he did to that panda is unthinkable.... :smt078 lol
lol :D hey that was mutual love ! she came onto me ! 8-[
i'm not convinced.... the poor thing looked frightened :smt110

Re: iFLuX vs Z E R O

Posted: Tue Jun 04, 2013 2:16 pm
by ~Desert Phantom~
:shock: maybe OE and TAF are one solid unit :-D

Re: iFLuX vs Z E R O

Posted: Tue Jun 04, 2013 2:31 pm
by Guild
~Desert Phantom~ wrote::shock: maybe OE and TAF are one solid unit :-D

who knows :D

Oh i know, Math ?

Re: iFLuX vs Z E R O

Posted: Tue Jun 04, 2013 3:20 pm
by Mathlord
Guild wrote:
~Desert Phantom~ wrote::shock: maybe OE and TAF are one solid unit :-D

who knows :D

Oh i know, Math ?
Ahahahahahahahahahahahaha.

Bite me.

Or is this is all one giant ruse of hating eachother when we secretly have been allies for all of these years! Okay maybe not...

Don't worry TAF hates all of you equally :-D

Re: iFLuX vs Z E R O

Posted: Tue Jun 04, 2013 3:25 pm
by ~Desert Phantom~
Keep the secret up Math...we don't need people knowing stuff;)

Re: iFLuX vs Z E R O

Posted: Tue Jun 04, 2013 3:26 pm
by Mathlord
~Desert Phantom~ wrote:Keep the secret up Math...we don't need people knowing stuff;)
I love you so much Tony!

Re: iFLuX vs Z E R O

Posted: Tue Jun 04, 2013 3:28 pm
by ~Desert Phantom~
Mathlord wrote:
~Desert Phantom~ wrote:Keep the secret up Math...we don't need people knowing stuff;)
I love you so much Tony!


:smt060 ...can you feel the love

Re: iFLuX vs Z E R O

Posted: Tue Jun 04, 2013 4:49 pm
by Z E R O
Spam much, lol.
You guys are hilarious :smt081

Re: iFLuX vs Z E R O

Posted: Tue Jun 04, 2013 6:02 pm
by mcdeadly
Im not sure what the problem with the double strike is... it is a function in the game same as ppt is so why not use it?
im not sure the alliance ppt should have been bought into this vindetta but meh. After Zero used it im not going to tell flux he cant.
also this is a vendetta.
i wouldnt have thought after you mass somebody you then have to wait for them to mass you back just so it is fair #-o
i would have thought the more kills for the least amount of losses is the go and if im right i would say flux is doing it right :D
keep the stats coming guys

Just my 2 Cents!!

Re: iFLuX vs Z E R O

Posted: Tue Jun 04, 2013 6:48 pm
by Z E R O
mcdeadly wrote:Im not sure what the problem with the double strike is... it is a function in the game same as ppt is so why not use it?
im not sure the alliance ppt should have been bought into this vindetta but meh. After Zero used it im not going to tell flux he cant.
also this is a vendetta.
i wouldnt have thought after you mass somebody you then have to wait for them to mass you back just so it is fair #-o
i would have thought the more kills for the least amount of losses is the go and if im right i would say flux is doing it right :D
keep the stats coming guys

Just my 2 Cents!!
He is doing well. He's blocked me on multiple ocassionas.. though only time i got him war/war he ppt'd immediately.. Alliance PPT i believe. Doesn't really matter.

He's killed more, I've killed more strike units trying to mass him than his defence units i've killed. You might say he's winning.. Let's remember that I got massed HARD when this started. He's gonna get massed just as hard.. he'll show if he's any good after he is in the same boat. ;)

If he thinks he's gonna get out of this with his defence.. lol. just lol.

Re: iFLuX vs Z E R O

Posted: Wed Jun 05, 2013 1:25 am
by Borek
well that's very true, someone starting with an offline mass vs someone not on crit and/or Nox it's going to be savage losses for sure, but then again you did start 2 duals "up" so i guess all told it's probably something like back to even now hehe, what happens from now will determine who comes out as a winner in terms of raw numbers.

And yes use all the features you have available by all means, just don't moan when they are countered by other features 8)

I have never complained about the use of the dbl or anything else in this, it's the accusation that someone is acting a coward when they ppt to avoid the opponent getting a 1 hr massive advantage. Bottom line is you both have 6 MT's a week and 4 alliance ppts and possible repairs, use them, don't use them, doesn't matter, there's no rules in place about what is or is not acceptable so you should assume anything goes.

Re: iFLuX vs Z E R O

Posted: Wed Jun 05, 2013 6:40 am
by mcdeadly
Borek wrote:well that's very true, someone starting with an offline mass vs someone not on crit and/or Nox it's going to be savage losses for sure, but then again you did start 2 duals "up" so i guess all told it's probably something like back to even now hehe, what happens from now will determine who comes out as a winner in terms of raw numbers.

And yes use all the features you have available by all means, just don't moan when they are countered by other features 8)

I have never complained about the use of the dbl or anything else in this, it's the accusation that someone is acting a coward when they ppt to avoid the opponent getting a 1 hr massive advantage. Bottom line is you both have 6 MT's a week and 4 alliance ppts and possible repairs, use them, don't use them, doesn't matter, there's no rules in place about what is or is not acceptable so you should assume anything goes.
=D>