StarGateWars Forums

So ur Robe's little errand boy are u Brdav? Enjoying running a dead alliance eh? Keep carping on about FUALL, but sadly for you and amusingly for me, TLE is a dead little alliance with Thamuz gone.

Don't come on here trying to divert people with your excuses. FUALL is this..EtL is that..who gives a **Filtered**! It always amuses me how u all attack us for things that you've done worse at.

I would be doing it wether you here or not so whats your pointless point?

Doc wrote:

REK wrote:not true they still wore TLE tags in forum they still said TLE knew that fuall would use this againt TLE.TJP and they were incoruaged to go ahead and set it off

yes true. doesn't make them tle ingame. and the nap stated.
"not to attack ingame from either sides" says nothing about forum tags. ingame tags.
so, madcat still has tle sig. is he still tle. :S
incouraged,or not. tjp still didn't brake it ingame. thus u r wrong

Yes your side did start it, doesnt matter of they dropped tags..I can take my wedding ring off and burn my marriage certificate, but that does not make me un-married now try again?

Jedi~Tank wrote:

Doc wrote:

REK wrote:not true they still wore TLE tags in forum they still said TLE knew that fuall would use this againt TLE.TJP and they were incoruaged to go ahead and set it off

yes true. doesn't make them tle ingame. and the nap stated.
"not to attack ingame from either sides" says nothing about forum tags. ingame tags.
so, madcat still has tle sig. is he still tle. :S
incouraged,or not. tjp still didn't brake it ingame. thus u r wrong

Yes your side did start it, doesnt matter of they dropped tags..I can take my wedding ring off and burn my marriage certificate, but that does not make me un-married now try again?

My side :S
yes it does, they werent members of it, so they didnt break the nap. lol r u so ignorant not to realise that?

Doc wrote:

Jedi~Tank wrote:

Doc wrote:

REK wrote:not true they still wore TLE tags in forum they still said TLE knew that fuall would use this againt TLE.TJP and they were incoruaged to go ahead and set it off

yes true. doesn't make them tle ingame. and the nap stated.
"not to attack ingame from either sides" says nothing about forum tags. ingame tags.
so, madcat still has tle sig. is he still tle. :S
incouraged,or not. tjp still didn't brake it ingame. thus u r wrong

Yes your side did start it, doesnt matter of they dropped tags..I can take my wedding ring off and burn my marriage certificate, but that does not make me un-married now try again?

My side :S
yes it does, they werent members of it, so they didnt break the nap. lol r u so ignorant not to realise that?

Secretly still being on the TLE HC as our screenshots showed a while back is breaking the NAP. Events since then have further strengthened our reasons. So Doc, were u on the TLE HC?

No dude Im not ignorant to it at all, I know who started the war and the plans to start the war and who the parties involved in the discussions to start the war and everything else there is to know of relavence.

SSG EnterTheLion wrote:

Doc wrote:

Jedi~Tank wrote:

Doc wrote:

REK wrote:not true they still wore TLE tags in forum they still said TLE knew that fuall would use this againt TLE.TJP and they were incoruaged to go ahead and set it off

yes true. doesn't make them tle ingame. and the nap stated.
"not to attack ingame from either sides" says nothing about forum tags. ingame tags.
so, madcat still has tle sig. is he still tle. :S
incouraged,or not. tjp still didn't brake it ingame. thus u r wrong

Yes your side did start it, doesnt matter of they dropped tags..I can take my wedding ring off and burn my marriage certificate, but that does not make me un-married now try again?

My side :S
yes it does, they werent members of it, so they didnt break the nap. lol r u so ignorant not to realise that?

Secretly still being on the TLE HC as our screenshots showed a while back is breaking the NAP. Events since then have further strengthened our reasons. So Doc, were u on the TLE HC?

"actions speak louder than words" who acted first. by breaking the nap ingame then eh?
No.
@jedi~tank
no, just ignorant to some of it. the facts.

The facts are you guys started the war LMAO and we finished it..so congratz, you woke up a whole shat load of SGW MONSTA'S, I for one am glad you did.

Jedi~Tank wrote:The facts are you guys started the war LMAO and we finished it..so congratz, you woke up a whole shat load of SGW MONSTA'S, I for one am glad you did.

No. the facts are you broke the nap ingame first. so how can you claim that. thats just basic ignorance,
well its not finished, yet.
stop using the term "you" i am not ttf. ty

Doc, shove it.
All you do is repost: "No no it ain't true!" Evidence given can be summarised into "It ain't true coz it ain't true."
Awesome logician.


I admire the uselessness of the arguments. Nothing to see, move it along now.
Then again.. who am I to hope for an enlightened view.

SSG EnterTheLion wrote:So ur Robe's little errand boy are u Brdav? Enjoying running a dead alliance eh? Keep carping on about FUALL, but sadly for you and amusingly for me, TLE is a dead little alliance with Thamuz gone.

Don't come on here trying to divert people with your excuses. FUALL is this..EtL is that..who gives a **Filtered**! It always amuses me how u all attack us for things that you've done worse at.

What`s your problem puss?

Diverting? Excuses? Attacking you? Are you high on your painkillers? Who is attacking who here lol? Insecure much? Feeling the pinch much? Missing the good old days? awwww. Sticks and stones puffy, sticks and stones.



I layed it out what happened with those 70tril you keep bringing up in some MS/Robe relation, as one who actually has a friggin 1st hand clue, unlike you, who ARE attacking a person that, funnyliy enough, prolly had the least to do with it in the first place, save handling the broker.

I showed you mine so I figured you`ll be a good sport and show me yours.



So I`m sry to be raining on your BS fingerpointing parade... again.

Just stop making stuff up and I wont be "following you around" y`hear lol?

I know old habbits die hard, but give it a go mkay?

Good kitteh.





And as for your claims, I claim rek is a crossdresser! Has about as much credence and weight, as your claims in this threads do lol*. If you believe yourselves winners and this conflict over simply act accordingly & dont just proclaim it lol.

P.S. For ban happy underlings:
* = none

Doc wrote:

Jedi~Tank wrote:The facts are you guys started the war LMAO and we finished it..so congratz, you woke up a whole shat load of SGW MONSTA'S, I for one am glad you did.

No. the facts are you broke the nap ingame first. so how can you claim that. thats just basic ignorance,
well its not finished, yet.
stop using the term "you" i am not ttf. ty

If your not TTF then roll dawg

Universe wrote:Doc, shove it.
All you do is repost: "No no it ain't true!" Evidence given can be summarised into "It ain't true coz it ain't true."
Awesome logician.


I admire the uselessness of the arguments. Nothing to see, move it along now.
Then again.. who am I to hope for an enlightened view.

Excuse me, have you actually read whats going on?
Thing is, the facts are conclusive. FUA did brake the nap first.
If you can't see that you are as nieve and ignorant as the next.

Shove it?
heh, pathetic.

Jedi~Tank wrote:

Doc wrote:

Jedi~Tank wrote:The facts are you guys started the war LMAO and we finished it..so congratz, you woke up a whole shat load of SGW MONSTA'S, I for one am glad you did.

No. the facts are you broke the nap ingame first. so how can you claim that. thats just basic ignorance,
well its not finished, yet.
stop using the term "you" i am not ttf. ty

If your not TTF then roll dawg

Why? i have every right, to post here.

Sure ya do..post away with your insults and excuses..after all thats what you and your lot are reduced to.