June 29th Updates (big / many...)

[Forum]

i'm getting conflicting requests on it
1) make nox un-re-noxable
2) remove 'remove nox' update entirely or make it much higher threshhold....
walks left and right at same time...hurts self...

Can it be made that Nox cannot be set again when you pass a certain amount of attacks per day... say 3x the un-Nox limit? So that overly aggressive actions on an day 'reward' you with being unable to get the Nox anymore for let's say the following 24 hours...

*pushes it again*

[Captain Teague]

Come on admin your 3mins late with the updates.

[TheKracken]

i know we should have a riot

[Wepwaet]

i'm getting conflicting requests on it
1) make nox un-re-noxable
2) remove 'remove nox' update entirely or make it much higher threshhold....
walks left and right at same time...hurts self...

Can it be made that Nox cannot be set again when you pass a certain amount of attacks per day... say 3x the un-Nox limit? So that overly aggressive actions on an day 'reward' you with being unable to get the Nox anymore for let's say the following 24 hours...

*pushes it again*

Ben's suggestion just rewards statbuilders who passively sit there and grow. A better compromise would be to make nox less effective the more agressive you are. But also make it less effective (more slowly though) the more inactive you are (don't reward statbuilders for just sitting there 24/7).

[Rican]

OMG
THE SKY IS FALLING
THE WORLD IS ENDING

[MaxSterling]

Is it a bad sign that the number code before the updates is 666?

[~Thamuz~]

Come on admin your 3mins late with the updates.

... updates in progress -- game will be back shortly...

[Rican]

A VERY BAD SIGN
AN OMEN OF DEATH

[Captain Teague]

Is it bad that you cant log in and you have this message appear:

... updates in progress -- game will be back shortly...

?


EDIT: Just to make us all calm hes made the words all green.

[Juliette]

Is it a bad sign that the number code before the updates is 666?

T.I.N.C.

Now that the updates are in progress, this thread no longer serves a purpose.
I suggest that, once the game is back up, we move to SuperSaiyan's threads:
Read this. SuperSaiyan's README after Updates.

Is it bad that you cant log in and you have this message appear:

... updates in progress -- game will be back shortly...

?

learn2read (See @Thamuz' message.)

[BMMJ13]

hmm...
need some testing...
it should not have been possible, or there is something in my code i am forgetting about

how was it? i don't think i changed the splatter mark, and did raise the min to attack from 12.5 to 15% ...
10 is also less than 12.5 -- was it possible to splatter previously with no platform and full strength fleets??

When I did testing with the previous update,
10% was required to not get that message about it being suicide.
Admin states that 12.5% needed to be sent in to survive.... but...
during testing it was actually more like 15% of a plenet's defense needed to be sent in to survive without getting splattered.

In short, yes it was somehow possible to get splattered against only planet defenses.

I tested on beta, and it was giving you the warning up to the % needed. I checked it in main as well, and it backed up how they behaved on beta besides the % being changed.

[Juliette]

By popular demand, thread will reopen UNTIL the updates are finished. it will be closed again not long after they're 'live'

And since that's now.. closed.