Page 15 of 15
Re: June 29th Updates (big / many...)
Posted: Tue Jun 29, 2010 8:57 am
by Forum
i'm getting conflicting requests on it
1) make nox un-re-noxable
2) remove 'remove nox' update entirely or make it much higher threshhold....
walks left and right at same time...hurts self...
BenjaminMS wrote:BenjaminMS wrote:Can it be made that Nox cannot be set again when you pass a certain amount of attacks per day... say 3x the un-Nox limit? So that overly aggressive actions on an day 'reward' you with being unable to get the Nox anymore for let's say the following 24 hours...
*pushes it again*
Re: June 29th Updates (big / many...)
Posted: Tue Jun 29, 2010 9:03 am
by Captain Teague
Come on admin your 3mins late with the updates.
Re: June 29th Updates (big / many...)
Posted: Tue Jun 29, 2010 9:04 am
by TheKracken
i know we should have a riot
Re: June 29th Updates (big / many...)
Posted: Tue Jun 29, 2010 9:06 am
by Wepwaet
Forum wrote:i'm getting conflicting requests on it
1) make nox un-re-noxable
2) remove 'remove nox' update entirely or make it much higher threshhold....
walks left and right at same time...hurts self...
BenjaminMS wrote:BenjaminMS wrote:Can it be made that Nox cannot be set again when you pass a certain amount of attacks per day... say 3x the un-Nox limit? So that overly aggressive actions on an day 'reward' you with being unable to get the Nox anymore for let's say the following 24 hours...
*pushes it again*
Ben's suggestion just rewards statbuilders who passively sit there and grow. A better compromise would be to make nox less effective the more agressive you are. But also make it less effective (more slowly though) the more inactive you are (don't reward statbuilders for just sitting there 24/7).
Re: June 29th Updates (big / many...)
Posted: Tue Jun 29, 2010 9:06 am
by Rican
OMG
THE SKY IS FALLING
THE WORLD IS ENDING
Re: June 29th Updates (big / many...)
Posted: Tue Jun 29, 2010 9:07 am
by MaxSterling
Is it a bad sign that the number code before the updates is 666?
Re: June 29th Updates (big / many...)
Posted: Tue Jun 29, 2010 9:08 am
by ~Thamuz~
O_Altair_O wrote:Come on admin your 3mins late with the updates.
... updates in progress -- game will be back shortly...
Re: June 29th Updates (big / many...)
Posted: Tue Jun 29, 2010 9:09 am
by Rican
A VERY BAD SIGN
AN OMEN OF DEATH
Re: June 29th Updates (big / many...)
Posted: Tue Jun 29, 2010 9:09 am
by Captain Teague
Is it bad that you cant log in and you have this message appear:
... updates in progress -- game will be back shortly...
?
EDIT: Just to make us all calm hes made the words all green.
Re: June 29th Updates (big / many...)
Posted: Tue Jun 29, 2010 9:12 am
by Juliette
MaxSterling wrote:Is it a bad sign that the number code before the updates is 666?
T.I.N.C.
Now that the updates are in progress, this thread no longer serves a purpose.
I suggest that, once the game is back up, we move to SuperSaiyan's threads:
Read this. SuperSaiyan's README after Updates.O_Altair_O wrote:Is it bad that you cant log in and you have this message appear:
... updates in progress -- game will be back shortly...
?
learn2read (See @Thamuz' message.)
Re: June 29th Updates (big / many...)
Posted: Tue Jun 29, 2010 10:40 am
by BMMJ13
Forum wrote:hmm...
need some testing...
it should not have been possible, or there is something in my code i am forgetting about
MaxSterling wrote:Forum wrote:how was it? i don't think i changed the splatter mark, and did raise the min to attack from 12.5 to 15% ...
10 is also less than 12.5 -- was it possible to splatter previously with no platform and full strength fleets??
MaxSterling wrote:When I did testing with the previous update,
10% was required to not get that message about it being suicide.
Admin states that 12.5% needed to be sent in to survive.... but...
during testing it was actually more like 15% of a plenet's defense needed to be sent in to survive without getting splattered.
In short, yes it was somehow possible to get splattered against only planet defenses.
I tested on beta, and it was giving you the warning up to the % needed. I checked it in main as well, and it backed up how they behaved on beta besides the % being changed.
Re: June 29th Updates (big / many...)
Posted: Tue Jun 29, 2010 12:03 pm
by Juliette
Earendil wrote:By popular demand, thread will reopen UNTIL the updates are finished. it will be closed again not long after they're 'live'
And since that's now.. closed.