Page 15 of 23

Re: Top UP?

Posted: Thu Sep 02, 2010 11:57 am
by BMMJ13
High Empty wrote:The different is in the ascensions, By getting to the higher ascensions peoples get more base income, At the moment i make 1 tril a turn.. my USS's got me there quicker, but everyone will be here.

I'm 80% sure that all those that didn't get fed or support, are about 1 behind, cause last week i was at under 300k ( 7 days ago).

Yes, Understandable. Ascensions provide a snowball effect. I believe you are probably right that most are around 300k UP, however I'm wondering who has done best without getting outside support. I believe the biggest I've seen on someone is 600k or so raw.

And 1 tril a turn...damn...I doubt I'm going to catch up to you anytime soon. :neutral:

Re: Top UP?

Posted: Thu Sep 02, 2010 1:43 pm
by bebita
High Empty wrote:
BMMJ13 wrote:
High Empty wrote:now you see that's just not a valid question

Cause people who get fed, or support the game, change the whole equation.
Unit Production: 65123 is the UP of an inactive account.

If there was no feeding or USS buying,
Then the top up should be around 100,000-125,000.
Reason behind this, is feeding and USS buying just increase the Rate of the game. With them we'd be in the equilant of the second week, now. Since all UP and techs are Linked to the TOP one, it's not as a big deal if someone get's extra naq from other sources. They end up paying more for UP when the next guys pays less. Every inactive at the moment should be able to log in, boost there up to 300-400k, and start ascending, in the following weeks, they will be able to boost it to 1mil + ( when the farms get to 30-50 bil per hit.

I mean the UP of someone who has not used either of those methods not available to everyone to build up their account. As far as I can tell, everyone above 1 mil per day UP have used one of those methods to gain an advantage, and while yes, those at the top make it cheaper for those at the bottom, there is still a significant gap between the haves and the have nots.

So basically, I'm not asking what the top UP would be if there was no feeding/USS buying, but I'm trying to figure out the gap between those who use those methods and those who are only farming/banking their naq.


The different is in the ascensions, By getting to the higher ascensions peoples get more base income, At the moment i make 1 tril a turn.. my USS's got me there quicker, but everyone will be here.

I'm 80% sure that all those that didn't get fed or support, are about 1 behind, cause last week i was at under 300k ( 7 days ago).

Unit Production 536,873 /day
dunno if i am ahead of non $ spenders
i don't have naq for spy level ](*,)
and damn is so hard with no income
strike is huge for some :(

Re: Top UP?

Posted: Thu Sep 02, 2010 4:08 pm
by SÅTÅN 666
Unit Production: 2212273
:lol:
I guess ya all know who has this.

Re: Top UP?

Posted: Thu Sep 02, 2010 4:16 pm
by High Empty
Yup Jack

who's about 66 tril ahead of me at the moment. and 500k uu :cry: :lol:

Re: Top UP?

Posted: Thu Sep 02, 2010 4:22 pm
by knight
High Empty wrote:yah my UP is going to be cheaper for awhile..

Unit Production: 2112373 Jack


SÅTÅN 666 wrote:Unit Production: 2212273

I guess ya all know who has this.


And you could too if you would read before you posted. :roll:

Re: Top UP?

Posted: Thu Sep 02, 2010 5:10 pm
by ph30nix
every time i see knights name showing up as the newest posting i always assume he had to lock a thread...

Re: Top UP?

Posted: Thu Sep 02, 2010 5:15 pm
by Bernie Sanders
i thought the same thing.
was like ''oh no. who said something slightly spammy and barely off-topic and made knight lock this one?''

Re: Top UP?

Posted: Thu Sep 02, 2010 9:15 pm
by wolfster
go jack?

Re: Top UP?

Posted: Thu Sep 02, 2010 9:26 pm
by Neimenljivi
High Empty wrote:Yup Jack

who's about 66 tril ahead of me at the moment. and 500k uu :cry: :lol:


700k+ now :razz:

You didn't think I was gonna let you get to 13 without any competition right? No fun in that matey :P

PS: To everyone that has posted my UP without me allowing it - it is AGAINST forum rules as it's PROHIBITED to post other people's stats and next time someone does this, I WILL report it to mods ;)

~Jack

Re: Top UP?

Posted: Fri Sep 03, 2010 2:08 am
by High Empty
reply Jack's UP and Forums rule..
No it isn't it's public Record...
You want top up, then it's a Known value.
Been that way for waves.

24*75320+24*18831=2259624

Re: Top UP?

Posted: Fri Sep 03, 2010 3:18 am
by Neimenljivi
Yes Andrew, it is.. As long as it isn't told who has it, but you indicated it was me by saying "Thanks Jack for making it cheaper" ;) Anyway it doesn't matter now, but for the future..

~Jack

Re: Top UP?

Posted: Fri Sep 03, 2010 5:36 am
by ph30nix
just look at it this way jack we are all just jealous of your massive uP ;)

Re: Top UP?

Posted: Sat Sep 04, 2010 2:56 am
by Neimenljivi
So u guys all **Filtered** about how I got Deerslayer's 25T naq..but you've missed..

02:24 High Empty 773058926993 bebita 1019300301947 144,002,053,185,840 Naquadah lost 43 0

:lol:

~Jack

Re: Top UP?

Posted: Sat Sep 04, 2010 4:09 am
by renegadze
Neimenljivi wrote:So u guys all **Filtered** about how I got Deerslayer's 25T naq..but you've missed..

02:24 High Empty 773058926993 bebita 1019300301947 144,002,053,185,840 Naquadah lost 43 0

:lol:

~Jack


cause and affect

One person being fed causes others to decide to go down that road

Re: Top UP?

Posted: Sat Sep 04, 2010 4:38 am
by Neimenljivi
renegadze wrote:
Neimenljivi wrote:So u guys all **Filtered** about how I got Deerslayer's 25T naq..but you've missed..

02:24 High Empty 773058926993 bebita 1019300301947 144,002,053,185,840 Naquadah lost 43 0

:lol:

~Jack


cause and affect

One person being fed causes others to decide to go down that road


](*,)
it was publicly announced about the time frame he's gonna be off PPT so had u paid more attention, maybe you would have gotten it.

~Jack