StarGateWars Forums

Can someone tell me what happened pages 1-90? I missed them. That should only take a 5000 word essay to explain, right? (I'm serious, when would this have stopped, why did it start?)

Jedi~Tank wrote:

Abhorsen 1991 wrote:I don't post for two days and it gets turned into a mud slinging match again

I know this'll sound bad but while it was nice a certain list of people didn't post at all XD

(I'm not saying who or which side for a reason)

i think we all need to start getting over this war yeah? I know most of us basically ignore the fact its going on except for when we are farming. I don't mind uys being at war its nice

but this thread dirties the very idea of warring within SGW, which is not very nice. seriously, how can we not get along? we're all real people with real lives and 90% of us would never let something like this go on for 2 years in real life with a friend or even someone we know, we'd confront it, and talk it out, seeing what all the problems are because at this stage I don't think anyone really remembers the reason for this THING to begin with

I realise this post is going to be most likely ignored by JT and Deni, but the two of you should at least read this

One of the main reasons m8 is your last statement..you slung mud although in a nice way..you still took your shot..neither of us ignore anything..and we do know the reason this started..just because FS has forgotten..lol..does not mean everyone else has..and FYI there was a point that this could have ended but it was made out to be something else..so onward we go and we are fine with it.

sorry man, I didn't mean it in a bad way it's just any time I post something nice the two of you either ignore it or miss the post (I suppose I should've written it like that haha.

is there any chance you explaining why it started from DDE's point of view?
I'm speaking from my perspective at the moment so if I said fs can't remember again I apologise, but I can't haha.

also when was the point when this could've ended? and what what would've needed to be done on both sides for the war to end?

Im just trying to get up to speed again

amag?
who are you?!
seriosuly!

if you want to talk diplomacy we do it on MSN or Teamspeak, if you want the reason for the war then get Easy to post it and Ill either confirm it or rebuke it depends if he tells the truth or not...but just so everyone knows I massed everyone off ppt on the day it started as a result.......

Jedi~Tank wrote:if you want to talk diplomacy we do it on MSN or Teamspeak, if you want the reason for the war then get Easy to post it and Ill either confirm it or rebuke it depends if he tells the truth or not...but just so everyone knows I massed everyone off ppt on the day it started as a result.......

cool beans!

Jedi~Tank wrote:if you want to talk diplomacy we do it on MSN or Teamspeak, if you want the reason for the war then get Easy to post it and Ill either confirm it or rebuke it depends if he tells the truth or not...but just so everyone knows I massed everyone off ppt on the day it started as a result.......

He'll post you'll rebuke he'll rebuke back blah blah blah it's been done countless times. Please don't post saying "if he posted the truth", both the sides have posted their version and it's never getting agreed on.

I haven't spent a single dollar on this game, and probably never will. I was a pro league fps player and that will always be where I'm serious. while this game is fun (at times) it isn't anything serious enough for money from me.

JT, the thing with us not knowing how to war? We all know that's bull considering FS's past successes. You just don't like the way we war now. Not mudslinging, it's a fact. You don't think we can war because you don't like the way we do it. Not pointing or singling you out, that's been DDE's argument this whole time, and that's been our argument it's getting old. You'll say you're winning cause of alliance state, we'll say we're winning based off losses, and that's not changing any time soon either so both sides stop arguing about it.

On the other hand, I think Coyle's suggestion about what to do is probably the only productive thing said in the past 23435 pages...or atleast the past 30. I think it's worth following. Just saying.

Now, is this gonna get read and taken for what it's saying or is it going to get nit picked out of its intention? (yes that was mudslinging have to keep it a war thread and it's a joke lol.)

xDaku wrote:

Jedi~Tank wrote:if you want to talk diplomacy we do it on MSN or Teamspeak, if you want the reason for the war then get Easy to post it and Ill either confirm it or rebuke it depends if he tells the truth or not...but just so everyone knows I massed everyone off ppt on the day it started as a result.......

He'll post you'll rebuke he'll rebuke back blah blah blah it's been done countless times. Please don't post saying "if he posted the truth", both the sides have posted their version and it's never getting agreed on.

I haven't spent a single dollar on this game, and probably never will. I was a pro league fps player and that will always be where I'm serious. while this game is fun (at times) it isn't anything serious enough for money from me.

JT, the thing with us not knowing how to war? We all know that's bull considering FS's past successes. You just don't like the way we war now. Not mudslinging, it's a fact. You don't think we can war because you don't like the way we do it. Not pointing or singling you out, that's been DDE's argument this whole time, and that's been our argument it's getting old. You'll say you're winning cause of alliance state, we'll say we're winning based off losses, and that's not changing any time soon either so both sides stop arguing about it.

On the other hand, I think Coyle's suggestion about what to do is probably the only productive thing said in the past 23435 pages...or atleast the past 30. I think it's worth following. Just saying.

Now, is this gonna get read and taken for what it's saying or is it going to get nit picked out of its intention? (yes that was mudslinging have to keep it a war thread and it's a joke lol.)

I dont think you even know what the hell you are talking about. I could care less how you war TBH. You dont do anything anyways so what are you yapping about..oh thats how you war my bad..well..lol

Jedi~Tank wrote:

xDaku wrote:

Jedi~Tank wrote:if you want to talk diplomacy we do it on MSN or Teamspeak, if you want the reason for the war then get Easy to post it and Ill either confirm it or rebuke it depends if he tells the truth or not...but just so everyone knows I massed everyone off ppt on the day it started as a result.......

He'll post you'll rebuke he'll rebuke back blah blah blah it's been done countless times. Please don't post saying "if he posted the truth", both the sides have posted their version and it's never getting agreed on.

I haven't spent a single dollar on this game, and probably never will. I was a pro league fps player and that will always be where I'm serious. while this game is fun (at times) it isn't anything serious enough for money from me.

JT, the thing with us not knowing how to war? We all know that's bull considering FS's past successes. You just don't like the way we war now. Not mudslinging, it's a fact. You don't think we can war because you don't like the way we do it. Not pointing or singling you out, that's been DDE's argument this whole time, and that's been our argument it's getting old. You'll say you're winning cause of alliance state, we'll say we're winning based off losses, and that's not changing any time soon either so both sides stop arguing about it.

On the other hand, I think Coyle's suggestion about what to do is probably the only productive thing said in the past 23435 pages...or atleast the past 30. I think it's worth following. Just saying.

Now, is this gonna get read and taken for what it's saying or is it going to get nit picked out of its intention? (yes that was mudslinging have to keep it a war thread and it's a joke lol.)

I dont think you even know what the hell you are talking about. I could care less how you war TBH. You dont do anything anyways so what are you yapping about..oh thats how you war my bad..well..lol

Considering most of this month was spent in the hospital JT I'm not surprised I didn't do much ingame. Oh well, guess I shouldn't have expected a better response to a post that wasn't even hostile to begin with. Meh, down the same road we go again. Congrats people.

~Coyle~ wrote:

~matty~ wrote:

amag27 wrote:I got an idea... war for week, and set up a losses system to decide who wins using percentage of alliance's total units lost.

this war has been going on to long to set up anything like this, it would be a waiste of time.

theres not going to be a winner of this "war" anyway with knowing how FS and dde work, and if there is a winner it will probably take another year or 2 untill somebody calls it quits...

matty~

I did ask for a 7 v7 but no ones got back to us
Min defenses and such, look back a few pages

That's not true. I send a pm to your 3IC? and he ignored it and it seems he did not even tell you guys.

Oh well.

Get your own house in shape first i suggest and then come back to us again.

deni wrote:

~Coyle~ wrote:

~matty~ wrote:

amag27 wrote:I got an idea... war for week, and set up a losses system to decide who wins using percentage of alliance's total units lost.

this war has been going on to long to set up anything like this, it would be a waiste of time.

theres not going to be a winner of this "war" anyway with knowing how FS and dde work, and if there is a winner it will probably take another year or 2 untill somebody calls it quits...

matty~

I did ask for a 7 v7 but no ones got back to us
Min defenses and such, look back a few pages

That's not true. I send a pm to your 3IC? and he ignored it and it seems he did not even tell you guys.

Oh well.

Get your own house in shape first i suggest and then come back to us again.

I believe DarkHero volunteered to represent FS in discussing this idea with you, since he is one of the very few FS members your havent lied & BSed about, or insulted to the point where they dont even want to speak with DDE HC. Then DH got a new job so he got very busy in RL, Im sure he will get round to it when he is settled into his new job but TBH I see no hurry, peace is not high on FS list of priorities

MEZZANINE wrote:

deni wrote:

~Coyle~ wrote:

~matty~ wrote:

amag27 wrote:I got an idea... war for week, and set up a losses system to decide who wins using percentage of alliance's total units lost.

this war has been going on to long to set up anything like this, it would be a waiste of time.

theres not going to be a winner of this "war" anyway with knowing how FS and dde work, and if there is a winner it will probably take another year or 2 untill somebody calls it quits...

matty~

I did ask for a 7 v7 but no ones got back to us
Min defenses and such, look back a few pages

That's not true. I send a pm to your 3IC? and he ignored it and it seems he did not even tell you guys.

Oh well.

Get your own house in shape first i suggest and then come back to us again.

I believe DarkHero volunteered to represent FS in discussing this idea with you, since he is one of the very few FS members your havent lied & BSed about, or insulted to the point where they dont even want to speak with DDE HC. Then DH got a new job so he got very busy in RL, Im sure he will get round to it when he is settled into his new job but TBH I see no hurry, peace is not high on FS list of priorities

Who said something about peace?





Btw, it is statements like the one above that compromise you. It is a sign of weakness to resort to personal insults (one just needs to take a look in the public dump to see) like you do.

As long as FS is not able to keep the talk ingame and about INGAME actions do not bother to talk to us.

deni wrote:

MEZZANINE wrote:

deni wrote:

~Coyle~ wrote:

~matty~ wrote:

amag27 wrote:I got an idea... war for week, and set up a losses system to decide who wins using percentage of alliance's total units lost.

this war has been going on to long to set up anything like this, it would be a waiste of time.

theres not going to be a winner of this "war" anyway with knowing how FS and dde work, and if there is a winner it will probably take another year or 2 untill somebody calls it quits...

matty~

I did ask for a 7 v7 but no ones got back to us
Min defenses and such, look back a few pages

That's not true. I send a pm to your 3IC? and he ignored it and it seems he did not even tell you guys.

Oh well.

Get your own house in shape first i suggest and then come back to us again.

I believe DarkHero volunteered to represent FS in discussing this idea with you, since he is one of the very few FS members your havent lied & BSed about, or insulted to the point where they dont even want to speak with DDE HC. Then DH got a new job so he got very busy in RL, Im sure he will get round to it when he is settled into his new job but TBH I see no hurry, peace is not high on FS list of priorities

Who said something about peace?





Btw, it is statements like the one above that compromise you. It is a sign of weakness to resort to personal insults (one just needs to take a look in the public dump to see) like you do.

As long as FS is not able to keep the talk ingame and about INGAME actions do not bother to talk to us.

Well if your read the posts the whole point of this 7-v-7 suggestion was to be a way of deciding a winner in an unwinable war.

As for my comments above, I was simply explaining why no one had been in touch yet, you dont like the truth, or take offense from it you really have no one else to blame but yourself.

MEZZANINE wrote:
Well if your read the posts the whole point of this 7-v-7 suggestion was to be a way of deciding a winner in an unwinable war.

As for my comments above, I was simply explaining why no one had been in touch yet, you dont like the truth, or take offense from it you really have no one else to blame but yourself.

Oh, so let me get this straight:

FS complains that we did not contacted them about the suggestion they made, despite the fact that we did. You just choose that you did not want to reply to us after complaining that we did not reply to you. I get it now



One question: why did you make the suggestion when you had no intention to follow it yourself? Or did you get scared to have a 7 vs 7 with minimum defenses set?

Massed, sabbed and AC'd some stuff.

Rawr if we do have a 7 v 7 I wanna be part of it...

deni wrote:

MEZZANINE wrote:
Well if your read the posts the whole point of this 7-v-7 suggestion was to be a way of deciding a winner in an unwinable war.

As for my comments above, I was simply explaining why no one had been in touch yet, you dont like the truth, or take offense from it you really have no one else to blame but yourself.

Oh, so let me get this straight:

FS complains that we did not contacted them about the suggestion they made, despite the fact that we did. You just choose that you did not want to reply to us after complaining that we did not reply to you. I get it now



One question: why did you make the suggestion when you had no intention to follow it yourself? Or did you get scared to have a 7 vs 7 with minimum defenses set?

Now you've confused me, I posted a few paged back that a representative would be in touch, and have just explained that the representative we were sending is busy in RL due to new job and will be in touch when he has time. Never complained about you not getting in touch, and have no idea who you sent a PM too, probably one of the afore mentioned people who dont want to speak with you.

As for scared Glad to see you still have a sense of humour.

But since you have just stated this 7-v-7 would not bring an end to this conflict I see no point in pursuing the idea further as it would just drain resources we can use to get far better kill ratios with while achieving nothing. Seems you are the one who is scared, too scared to go all in on a deciding battle.