StarGateWars Forums

kojak wrote:Rawr if we do have a 7 v 7 I wanna be part of it...

I fear that won't happen Koji. Just read Mezzanine's post above and see who FS tries to wind themselves out of their own suggestion.

I thought the initial idea of a 7v7 was to end the conflict and as such "go out with a bang"

either way Commander Vimes has been taken down along with those 10 mill spies and a 3.5 trill defence

thank you and yes ive ppt cause u can all sit and watch for the next fs person to come along take another one down and yes ppt again just cause it gets to you all

Brothers wrote:either way Commander Vimes has been taken down along with those 10 mill spies and a 3.5 trill defence

thank you and yes ive ppt cause u can all sit and watch for the next fs person to come along take another one down and yes ppt again just cause it gets to you all

Big boy.


Ryland tells me you are missing your AC'ers?


Guess even being off ppt for a few minutes is not safe huh?


Run chicken, run


And they wonder why you are scared **Filtered** of a 7 vs 7



PS: I suggest you read the TL vs mH topic. Maybe you will understand how respect is gained.

deni wrote:

Brothers wrote:either way Commander Vimes has been taken down along with those 10 mill spies and a 3.5 trill defence

thank you and yes ive ppt cause u can all sit and watch for the next fs person to come along take another one down and yes ppt again just cause it gets to you all

Big boy.


Ryland tells me you are missing your AC'ers?


Guess even being off ppt for a few minutes is not safe huh?


Run chicken, run


And they wonder why you are scared **Filtered** of a 7 vs 7



PS: I suggest you read the TL vs mH topic. Maybe you will understand how respect is gained.

Please Deni stop with your posts, i read some of them and just no.

I suggested the 7 v 7, would have been a good laugh, i cant be arsed now after the last few pages of bull

MEZZANINE wrote:

deni wrote:

MEZZANINE wrote:
Well if your read the posts the whole point of this 7-v-7 suggestion was to be a way of deciding a winner in an unwinable war.

As for my comments above, I was simply explaining why no one had been in touch yet, you dont like the truth, or take offense from it you really have no one else to blame but yourself.

Oh, so let me get this straight:

FS complains that we did not contacted them about the suggestion they made, despite the fact that we did. You just choose that you did not want to reply to us after complaining that we did not reply to you. I get it now



One question: why did you make the suggestion when you had no intention to follow it yourself? Or did you get scared to have a 7 vs 7 with minimum defenses set?

Now you've confused me, I posted a few paged back that a representative would be in touch, and have just explained that the representative we were sending is busy in RL due to new job and will be in touch when he has time. Never complained about you not getting in touch, and have no idea who you sent a PM too, probably one of the afore mentioned people who dont want to speak with you.

As for scared Glad to see you still have a sense of humour.

But since you have just stated this 7-v-7 would not bring an end to this conflict I see no point in pursuing the idea further as it would just drain resources we can use to get far better kill ratios with while achieving nothing. Seems you are the one who is scared, too scared to go all in on a deciding battle.

How about a 1 vs 7 in a deciding battle big mouth..Ill be the one It will roll this way..when someones def gets 0'd thier out and no alliance ppt's..after 3 hours a ppt break if one chooses..you 0 me you win,,I 0 you all we win, simple really, now where's your balls? I brang mine wherever I go...erm wherever the jar goes

Jedi~Tank wrote:

MEZZANINE wrote:

deni wrote:

MEZZANINE wrote:
Well if your read the posts the whole point of this 7-v-7 suggestion was to be a way of deciding a winner in an unwinable war.

As for my comments above, I was simply explaining why no one had been in touch yet, you dont like the truth, or take offense from it you really have no one else to blame but yourself.

Oh, so let me get this straight:

FS complains that we did not contacted them about the suggestion they made, despite the fact that we did. You just choose that you did not want to reply to us after complaining that we did not reply to you. I get it now



One question: why did you make the suggestion when you had no intention to follow it yourself? Or did you get scared to have a 7 vs 7 with minimum defenses set?

Now you've confused me, I posted a few paged back that a representative would be in touch, and have just explained that the representative we were sending is busy in RL due to new job and will be in touch when he has time. Never complained about you not getting in touch, and have no idea who you sent a PM too, probably one of the afore mentioned people who dont want to speak with you.

As for scared Glad to see you still have a sense of humour.

But since you have just stated this 7-v-7 would not bring an end to this conflict I see no point in pursuing the idea further as it would just drain resources we can use to get far better kill ratios with while achieving nothing. Seems you are the one who is scared, too scared to go all in on a deciding battle.

How about a 1 vs 7 in a deciding battle big mouth..Ill be the one It will roll this way..when someones def gets 0'd thier out and no alliance ppt's..after 3 hours a ppt break if one chooses..you 0 me you win,,I 0 you all we win, simple really, now where's your balls? I brang mine wherever I go...erm wherever the jar goes

Thats a load of crock, fat change we will zero you as non of us can sab you while massing, while we would more than likely zero some of the others that would be included, maybe bar deni, but any of the otehrs would fall.
Anyway it will be a few months til we can do this, i have ascending to do

ye Coyle Im am challenging ALL of your best..so you guys need to put up or hush up.. as a matter of fact, why not myself and deni take on your alliance in a winner take all, you get 0'd your out and we will shut you guys up 1 by 1.

on another note, you couldnt beat my Scorpion Squad so why go there.

~Coyle~ wrote:

Jedi~Tank wrote:

MEZZANINE wrote:

deni wrote:

MEZZANINE wrote:
Well if your read the posts the whole point of this 7-v-7 suggestion was to be a way of deciding a winner in an unwinable war.

As for my comments above, I was simply explaining why no one had been in touch yet, you dont like the truth, or take offense from it you really have no one else to blame but yourself.

Oh, so let me get this straight:

FS complains that we did not contacted them about the suggestion they made, despite the fact that we did. You just choose that you did not want to reply to us after complaining that we did not reply to you. I get it now



One question: why did you make the suggestion when you had no intention to follow it yourself? Or did you get scared to have a 7 vs 7 with minimum defenses set?

Now you've confused me, I posted a few paged back that a representative would be in touch, and have just explained that the representative we were sending is busy in RL due to new job and will be in touch when he has time. Never complained about you not getting in touch, and have no idea who you sent a PM too, probably one of the afore mentioned people who dont want to speak with you.

As for scared Glad to see you still have a sense of humour.

But since you have just stated this 7-v-7 would not bring an end to this conflict I see no point in pursuing the idea further as it would just drain resources we can use to get far better kill ratios with while achieving nothing. Seems you are the one who is scared, too scared to go all in on a deciding battle.

How about a 1 vs 7 in a deciding battle big mouth..Ill be the one It will roll this way..when someones def gets 0'd thier out and no alliance ppt's..after 3 hours a ppt break if one chooses..you 0 me you win,,I 0 you all we win, simple really, now where's your balls? I brang mine wherever I go...erm wherever the jar goes

Thats a load of crock, fat change we will zero you as non of us can sab you while massing, while we would more than likely zero some of the others that would be included, maybe bar deni, but any of the otehrs would fall.
Anyway it will be a few months til we can do this, i have ascending to do

You say on here you would beat me, well my friend, how come I have not been attacked by FS in em say 4 months.

@ Deni,

@ JT, IF the 7-v-7 was to be a decider it would have had to have been either equally matched accounts, or some where DDE accounts had the advantage and some where FS accounts had the advantage. Not just us training up for you to use your higher levels to sab/AC us with UU you buy back instantly.

@ Kojak, you dont get attacked because the updates and DDEs rota of covering the alliance PPT/repair buttons keep you safe offline, and who the hell can afford 30Trill+ strike/def onliners ? We will take you down again when the opportunity arises, and Ive already told you that when that happens I will gladly meet you online with more reasonably stats so long as you can keep JT on his leash and out of our fun.

@ descalah, your 25 Trill def, 100+ Mill weapons, 50 mill supers, 40 mill spies were yummy, whats for desert

MEZZANINE wrote:@ Deni,

@ JT, IF the 7-v-7 was to be a decider it would have had to have been either equally matched accounts, or some where DDE accounts had the advantage and some where FS accounts had the advantage. Not just us training up for you to use your higher levels to sab/AC us with UU you buy back instantly.

@ Kojak, you dont get attacked because the updates and DDEs rota of covering the alliance PPT/repair buttons keep you safe offline, and who the hell can afford 30Trill+ strike/def onliners ? We will take you down again when the opportunity arises, and Ive already told you that when that happens I will gladly meet you online with more reasonably stats so long as you can keep JT on his leash and out of our fun.

@ descalah, your 25 Trill def, 100+ Mill weapons, 50 mill supers, 40 mill spies were yummy, whats for desert

I know Mezz, you would prefer to "fight" 7 DoC trainee accounts - freshly ascended if possible cause a 7 vs JT is too disadvantageous for you


A well meant advice: Do not make offers you do not intend to honour/keep. It discredits you.

deni wrote:

MEZZANINE wrote:@ Deni,

@ JT, IF the 7-v-7 was to be a decider it would have had to have been either equally matched accounts, or some where DDE accounts had the advantage and some where FS accounts had the advantage. Not just us training up for you to use your higher levels to sab/AC us with UU you buy back instantly.

@ Kojak, you dont get attacked because the updates and DDEs rota of covering the alliance PPT/repair buttons keep you safe offline, and who the hell can afford 30Trill+ strike/def onliners ? We will take you down again when the opportunity arises, and Ive already told you that when that happens I will gladly meet you online with more reasonably stats so long as you can keep JT on his leash and out of our fun.

@ descalah, your 25 Trill def, 100+ Mill weapons, 50 mill supers, 40 mill spies were yummy, whats for desert

I know Mezz, you would prefer to "fight" 7 DoC trainee accounts - freshly ascended if possible cause a 7 vs JT is too disadvantageous for you


A well meant advice: Do not make offers you do not intend to honour/keep. It discredits you.

Mezz if you can take a 25T why not take a 30, not that much more mate.

And I know "when" I lose em we will have fun, but I at least you guys could all bunch together organise yourselves have someone with a massive strike etc and just try, We here in DDE would love it if an effort like that was made, and yes Im sure more of them would respect you guys for it. I certainly would. If you try your best and fail well then at least you tried eh

@ Deni, please try just for once to READ a post, and NOT totally mis-represent it's meaning in your reply. You wonder why no one in FS wanted to discuss the 7-v-7 with you, it's because of BS posts like those.

@ Kojak, I would have massed you mate, you were my first choice of the ones off PPT but MyHill was on duty ready to press the alliance PPT/Repair button, no point me wasting resources massing you half way just for someone else to PPT you, or repair you so you phase is there ? Descalah was just unlucky that whoever was meant to be on duty ready to use alliance functions in his alliance was knapping

MEZZANINE wrote:@ Deni, please try just for once to READ a post, and NOT totally mis-represent it's meaning in your reply. You wonder why no one in FS wanted to discuss the 7-v-7 with you, it's because of BS posts like those.

Well Mezzanine, my desire to talk to you or your fellow leadership staff is almost non existant, yet I tried assuming that your offer for an online fight was serious.

Apparently I was wrong and your previous posts only confirm that.

deni wrote:

MEZZANINE wrote:@ Deni, please try just for once to READ a post, and NOT totally mis-represent it's meaning in your reply. You wonder why no one in FS wanted to discuss the 7-v-7 with you, it's because of BS posts like those.

Well Mezzanine, my desire to talk to you or your fellow leadership staff is almost non existant, yet I tried assuming that your offer for an online fight was serious.

Apparently I was wrong and your previous posts only confirm that.

It was a serious suggestion made as a way of deciding a winner to this war, the moment YOU said it would not end the war the idea became pointless. Like I said many times DDE only fight when the odds are in your favor, I never made the suggestion, and personally never believed for a second you would allow a war to be decided by a fair fight so it came as no surprise that YOU were not up for it.