StarGateWars Forums

The individuals you see before you hating on OE have a long unhealthy obsession with OE. Why? Jealousy.

Time after time they get smacked senseless, not to mention being sat on the majority of the time. It's bound to wind them up.

Huxley wrote:The individuals you see before you hating on OE have a long unhealthy obsession with OE. Why? Jealousy.

Time after time they get smacked senseless, not to mention being sat on the majority of the time. It's bound to wind them up.

Huxley Huxley Huxley...the answer to people mocking your ridiculous empire can't always be "they're obsessed with us". Try at least some variety...it's cute when you said that about the first DDE person...it was mildly amusing about the second. Now you're just a broken record.

I'm not hating on OE...I just expect better...

Mathlord wrote:

Huxley wrote:The individuals you see before you hating on OE have a long unhealthy obsession with OE. Why? Jealousy.

Time after time they get smacked senseless, not to mention being sat on the majority of the time. It's bound to wind them up.

Huxley Huxley Huxley...the answer to people mocking your ridiculous empire can't always be "they're obsessed with us". Try at least some variety...it's cute when you said that about the first DDE person...it was mildly amusing about the second. Now you're just a broken record.

I'm not hating on OE...I just expect better...

[spoiler][/spoiler]
for math x

Mathlord wrote:

Huxley wrote:The individuals you see before you hating on OE have a long unhealthy obsession with OE. Why? Jealousy.

Time after time they get smacked senseless, not to mention being sat on the majority of the time. It's bound to wind them up.

Huxley Huxley Huxley...the answer to people mocking your ridiculous empire can't always be "they're obsessed with us". Try at least some variety...it's cute when you said that about the first DDE person...it was mildly amusing about the second. Now you're just a broken record.

I'm not hating on OE...I just expect better...

The most influential empire the game has ever seen, is ridiculous you say? That statement is ridiculous, sir.

Indeed, we did expect better. Look at the last war TAF/OE had, very strong looking TAF. Now, reduced to smoking rubble.

Huxley wrote:

Mathlord wrote:

Huxley wrote:The individuals you see before you hating on OE have a long unhealthy obsession with OE. Why? Jealousy.

Time after time they get smacked senseless, not to mention being sat on the majority of the time. It's bound to wind them up.

Huxley Huxley Huxley...the answer to people mocking your ridiculous empire can't always be "they're obsessed with us". Try at least some variety...it's cute when you said that about the first DDE person...it was mildly amusing about the second. Now you're just a broken record.

I'm not hating on OE...I just expect better...

The most influential empire the game has ever seen, is ridiculous you say? That statement is ridiculous, sir.

Indeed, we did expect better. Look at the last war TAF/OE had, very strong looking TAF. Now, reduced to smoking rubble.

[spoiler]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Uuuw0NGhOgk[/spoiler]

Huxley wrote:

Mathlord wrote:

Huxley wrote:The individuals you see before you hating on OE have a long unhealthy obsession with OE. Why? Jealousy.

Time after time they get smacked senseless, not to mention being sat on the majority of the time. It's bound to wind them up.

Huxley Huxley Huxley...the answer to people mocking your ridiculous empire can't always be "they're obsessed with us". Try at least some variety...it's cute when you said that about the first DDE person...it was mildly amusing about the second. Now you're just a broken record.

I'm not hating on OE...I just expect better...

The most influential empire the game has ever seen, is ridiculous you say? That statement is ridiculous, sir.

Indeed, we did expect better. Look at the last war TAF/OE had, very strong looking TAF. Now, reduced to smoking rubble.

Eh the most influential empire the game has ever seen should be able to field more than a couple consistent attackers. In that last war, your big accounts were rebuilding 100 tril defenses. Now they sit behind 5 mil def weps and big perma-merlined planets. It's an interesting way to play for sure. I look forward to serious rebuilds in the future.

Huxley, you love to talk...where is the action? Or are you only getting your ingame reports from your buddies who would rather thump their chest than count their losses?

Mathlord wrote:Eh the most influential empire the game has ever seen should be able to field more than a couple consistent attackers. In that last war, your big accounts were rebuilding 100 tril defenses. Now they sit behind 5 mil def weps and big perma-merlined planets. It's an interesting way to play for sure. I look forward to serious rebuilds in the future.

Huxley, you love to talk...where is the action? Or are you only getting your ingame reports from your buddies who would rather thump their chest than count their losses?

Adapt or lose is the way of the game. OE adapted. TAF haven't.

...

If adapting is letting 2 massive cash built accounts do all the fighting, then yeah sure, OE adapted.

[spoiler]I have no problem with them or anyone spending cash, it's just a fact.[/spoiler]

Huxley wrote:

Mathlord wrote:Eh the most influential empire the game has ever seen should be able to field more than a couple consistent attackers. In that last war, your big accounts were rebuilding 100 tril defenses. Now they sit behind 5 mil def weps and big perma-merlined planets. It's an interesting way to play for sure. I look forward to serious rebuilds in the future.

Huxley, you love to talk...where is the action? Or are you only getting your ingame reports from your buddies who would rather thump their chest than count their losses?

Adapt or lose is the way of the game. OE adapted. TAF haven't.

...

They adapted to build tiny stats with big planets permamerlined? Good job on that one haha.

Talk talk talk. All I see is talk talk and more talk. Action...give me action.

If you are so confident in OE superiority, build something real for us again, like Gandy's big ole defense he had last week. How long did that survive when his PPTs ran out?

I look forward to future kills on your most influential of empires

Mathlord wrote:They adapted to build tiny stats with big planets permamerlined? Good job on that one haha.

Talk talk talk. All I see is talk talk and more talk. Action...give me action.

Mathlord's Ingame Defense wrote:Defensive Action 0

Surtr's Ingame Defense wrote:Defensive Action 0

Am I seeing a pattern here?

Huxley wrote:

Mathlord wrote:They adapted to build tiny stats with big planets permamerlined? Good job on that one haha.

Talk talk talk. All I see is talk talk and more talk. Action...give me action.

Mathlord's Ingame Defense wrote:Defensive Action 0

Surtr's Ingame Defense wrote:Defensive Action 0

Am I seeing a pattern here?

They adapted huxley

Huxley wrote:

Surtr's Ingame Defense wrote:Defensive Action 0

Am I seeing a pattern here?

Yeah I got massed by HE, before that I got massed by ETL, before that ETL and before that HE...am I seeing a pattern here?

iFlux massed my MS once this war, every other time I have been massed (full or MS) I'll give you 2 guesses who did it

Duderanch wrote:

Huxley wrote:

Surtr's Ingame Defense wrote:Defensive Action 0

Am I seeing a pattern here?

Yeah I got massed by HE, before that I got massed by ETL, before that ETL and before that HE...am I seeing a pattern here?

iFlux massed my MS once this war, every other time I have been massed (full or MS) I'll give you 2 guesses who did it

If you would rebuild your ms more often

Finally! Nice job ETL on actually massing me! I only wish Gandy had done it so I could have gotten a war setting from him instead of you...

That's all I was asking for...you know you give an empire a bunch of war settings, you expect some serious love and attention in return.

I'll return the favor later ^_^

Clockwork wrote:

Mathlord wrote:Who on earth actually likes Omega?

me?